English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.WinUAE

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 08 October 2014, 11:30   #1
amigafreak68k
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Engelsdorf / Germany
Posts: 468
Architecture of PicassoIV ready for > 4MB RAM?

Hi Toni,

is the architecture of the PicassoIV RTG board ready to use more then the 4MB graphics mem? If yes, could this be implemented in WinUAE?
amigafreak68k is offline  
Old 08 October 2014, 11:38   #2
Toni Wilen
WinUAE developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,569
No. PicassoIV does not have reserved space for extra VRAM. After 4M VRAM comes 4M VRAM mirror with hardware byteswapping.
Toni Wilen is online now  
Old 08 October 2014, 14:36   #3
tnt23
Registered User
 
tnt23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saint-Petersburg / Russia
Posts: 324
Are there any decent resources on Picasso IV and/or RTG architecture? Just how feasible it would be to built an RTG card nowadays.
tnt23 is offline  
Old 08 October 2014, 14:47   #4
strim
NetBSD developer
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by tnt23 View Post
Are there any decent resources on Picasso IV and/or RTG architecture? Just how feasible it would be to built an RTG card nowadays.
That's an extremely interesting topic for me. To be honest, I was thinking about it too. The main problem seems to be obtaining a decent, modern graphics controller chip, that could be easily interfaced to Amiga. Most of readily available chips are very complicated and require PCI or PCI-Express bus. There are a few chips for the embedded market that are easier to interface with a parallel local bus.

The other problem is of course availability of the modern RTG software. There are no public driver development kits available for P96 or CyberGraphX. Developers of both of these systems either moved to MorphOS (CGX) or passed the rights to AmigaOS 4 developers (P96). Reverse engineering is of course possible, but legally problematic... So I consider both P96 and CGX useless for the purpose of creating a new graphics card. However, this implies that there would be an additional huge task of developing a new, modern RTG system.

I already did some research regarding to this. If you wish, we could discuss this matter further. However, this is definitely of out scope of Support.WinUAE forum .
strim is offline  
Old 08 October 2014, 19:15   #5
amigafreak68k
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Engelsdorf / Germany
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by strim View Post
If you wish, we could discuss this matter further. However, this is definitely of out scope of Support.WinUAE forum .
No problem. Any mod could move this thread to some other place. The question itself for WinUAE was answered
amigafreak68k is offline  
Old 09 October 2014, 09:41   #6
tnt23
Registered User
 
tnt23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saint-Petersburg / Russia
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by strim View Post
I already did some research regarding to this. If you wish, we could discuss this matter further. However, this is definitely of out scope of Support.WinUAE forum .
Open a topic in any convenient place, I'll join
tnt23 is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
amiga 600 (4mb ram) freeze nixxj project.WHDLoad 4 06 August 2012 23:02
4 x 4mb GVP Ram Simms o0Nosferatu0o MarketPlace 1 01 December 2011 20:57
FS: Supra RAM 500RX with 4MB ram tomcat666 MarketPlace 0 21 June 2011 10:06
WTB: VXL*30 with 4MB RAM Antti MarketPlace 1 28 January 2010 12:28
FS: GVP Ram 4mb coze MarketPlace 1 27 May 2007 10:36

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:48.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.12924 seconds with 12 queries