08 June 2020, 09:16 | #1 |
Blowing Out The Flame
|
wanting antivirus programmer
|
08 June 2020, 12:14 | #2 |
Coder/webmaster/gamer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canberra/Australia
Posts: 2,630
|
Apart from not being ReAction-based, is there anything wrong with the current virus checkers? Most can handle new viruses via brainfiles if that is the concern.
|
08 June 2020, 12:20 | #3 |
Semi-Retired
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Leiden / The Netherlands
Posts: 1,993
|
Brainfiles don't help against link viruses. Not that there have been any in 20 years.
|
11 June 2020, 15:41 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 41
Posts: 3,772
|
|
12 June 2020, 14:18 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Another World
Posts: 28
|
"Virus Help Team have the complete scource code for VirusZ II v1.45, that was kindly given to us from Georg Höermann.
(...) Virus Help Team is willing to give this scource code for VirusZ II v1.45 for free to anyone that would like to help us to make a new version of VirusZ" Why not just post the source code on Github or anywhere else, and let whoever wants to take it and develop it further if he wants while also the whole community getting the benefit of preserving yet another Amiga program? |
12 June 2020, 14:38 | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Madrid / Spain
Posts: 48
|
What's the point in not releasing the sources?
|
12 June 2020, 16:34 | #7 |
This cat is no more
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: FRANCE
Age: 52
Posts: 8,161
|
security by obscurity? Is there ANY open source antivirus?
If everybody has the source code, it's really much easier to write a virus to workaround the antivirus. |
12 June 2020, 16:41 | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Croydon
Posts: 580
|
That doesn't make any sense. That's like saying an open source encryption algorithm would be pointless because you could figure out how to crack it by looking at the source. Fact is open source encryption systems are usually the best solutions out there.
|
12 June 2020, 16:45 | #9 |
Semi-Retired
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Leiden / The Netherlands
Posts: 1,993
|
Besides, the recognition is mostly done through xvs.library. Not sure if it is part of the source.
|
12 June 2020, 16:52 | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 23
|
The reason why Virus Help Team has not released the source code for VirusZ II, is because we would like a little control over who gets the code for VirusZ. If everybody could get the code, everyone could make there own VirusZ, and people with not so good intentions could make a lot of trouble. It has to someone we can trust. And that person has not been found yet.
Georg Hoermann programmer of VirusZ, trusted Virus Help Team with the code, just as we want to trust the person we give the code to. |
12 June 2020, 17:40 | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Another World
Posts: 28
|
If someone has dubious intentions he can just replicate the GUI and would achieve the same result.
I don't want to sound rude but in your webpage you say no one of you is a programmer. I don't see why it has to be you who control who gets access to that code, and/or decide how and what to do with any future VirusZ version, because in the case someone is interested in investing maybe hundreds of hours in making it possible I don't see why he would need you besides getting the files. I would say that if you really want a new VirusZ version the best you can do is ease the access to the source code to anyone who would be interested in taking a peek at it. This has many benefits. First, the code doesn't die if something happens to you or your equipment. Second, it's much easier that someone is able to contribute a small fix here or there than fully commiting to the whole task, and the only way that can happen is if the code is public. That is the very nature of open sourcing something. Lastly, this can inspire someone to just read the code because he wants to learn about how VirusZ did what it did. I'd say, if you really care about VirusZ as you seem to do, then just set it free. |
12 June 2020, 20:35 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Leicester / England
Posts: 201
|
I looked at the post on the VHT site and thought that it would be a great thing to do and get involved in. It is really up my street in IT security with a passion for Amiga and 680x0, but the following requirement rules out not only me, but almost everybody else left who is active with the Amiga:
"Just to be on the safe side, we will need to see an anti-virus program that you have made, supporting the library's above, before we will send any viruses or trojans." If someone has to write a virus checker using xvs.library to stand a chance of their request to access the source code being considered, they might as well just write an entire virus checker in the first place. |
12 June 2020, 20:47 | #13 |
Semi-Retired
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Leiden / The Netherlands
Posts: 1,993
|
From the website:
We have been trying to contact .... Heiner Schneegold (VT-Schutz) .... I think he died 5 years ago. |
13 June 2020, 07:25 | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 23
|
Debvgger: I can understand what you are saying, but non of the antivirus programmers in the past like VirusChecker, VirusWorkshop VT-Schutz, has released there scource code, due to the same reasons that we give. Georg Hoermann could have released the code, but gave us, because he knew that we would do the right thing. Georg wrote in the about gadget in VirusZ II v1.45: "All developer files and other related stuff have been given to Jan Andersen of VHT Denmark. If anyone is interested in following my footsteps, contact him.."
Exodous: Anyone can make a new antivirus program, and it would be most welcome. And if a new antivirus program came up, we would support in any we possible can. Hedeon: Im very sorry to hear that, I did not know. I have send emails and snailmails to Heiner, and non of them was returned to me.. |
13 June 2020, 08:23 | #15 |
Coder/webmaster/gamer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canberra/Australia
Posts: 2,630
|
@Jan-VHT:
What is the nature, scale and urgency of the envisaged improvements? I might be able to help but I am not going to have much free time in the near future to make major changes, being already busy with several other programs. Last edited by Minuous; 13 June 2020 at 08:34. |
13 June 2020, 19:16 | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 23
|
@Minuous:
Well we have scource code for VirusZ II v1,45, which support the xvs.library, but we need to put another brainfile in the code, so it can find new viruses that has been found. Right now it is just a few trojans and maybe 30 new bootviruses. We havent seen any nasty linkviruses for a very long time. |
13 June 2020, 19:46 | #17 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 48
Posts: 9,355
|
Are there new virii?
|
13 June 2020, 21:33 | #18 |
Global Moderator
|
It seems so:
http://eab.abime.net/showthread.php?t=101687 |
14 June 2020, 00:35 | #19 | |
Zone Friend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Age: 40
Posts: 2,127
|
Quote:
Also early versions of VirusX was released with C Source code which John Veldius converted to assembler if I remember the docs correctly. |
|
14 June 2020, 08:58 | #20 |
Coder/webmaster/gamer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canberra/Australia
Posts: 2,630
|
@Jan-VHT:
If you still need a programmer a month or two from now I will be able to help out. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best antivirus | AMIGrAve | support.Apps | 15 | 05 November 2018 05:43 |
Antivirus KS1.3 | LeCaravage | request.Apps | 11 | 20 July 2018 22:59 |
2d Retro Game, needs unity programmer/programmer | Adrian Browne | Retrogaming General Discussion | 0 | 26 November 2016 11:57 |
Antivirus? | Mr B | support.Apps | 4 | 25 March 2011 17:19 |
antivirus | hal | Retrogaming General Discussion | 3 | 29 September 2002 18:12 |
|
|