12 September 2017, 20:26 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spijkenisse / the Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 525
|
amos pd library to tosec?
I am currently converting the huge amos pd cdrom library to single ADF files, restoring the correct labels and such. This process is mandatory to make good use of each single entry in the library.
Would it be a good addition to TOSEC when finished, so that all those amos adf's are readily available? Or am I just filling local diskspace? |
13 September 2017, 10:10 | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Federativnaya Respublika Germaniya
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
As you probably know, we prefer to preserve/catalog disk images in its original unique structure, this means dumps of disk images as they were distributed. Because you wrote "converting", i suppose the source is not any DMS or other disk image format. I am aware of "Network CD", where the content of each single disk is stored in directories. Its not that ideal, because you cant restore original disk structure. Right now, i cant find those AMOS PD CD, to check, if there are DMS images on it. Of course it would be a good addition, since it seems a unique Series |
|
13 September 2017, 10:50 | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spijkenisse / the Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 525
|
Each disk is stored in a folder structure, with appropriate S, C, Devs, etc directories included. But as you mention, it's not the diskstructure as it once was.
I will try to hunt down the cd version, I think it's on archive.org. edit: the cd itself is in the tosec-iso as well btw. |
13 September 2017, 11:06 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Age: 49
Posts: 2,951
|
Mai, how TOSEC can be sure an ADF was not manually created instead ?
|
13 September 2017, 14:27 | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Federativnaya Respublika Germaniya
Posts: 4,994
|
Meanwhile i am not sure anymore, if this collection is really a collection for its own, exclusively created and published by AMOSPD, at least there are already a few of them in current TOSEC release,
scattered in different sections! @chip There is no 100% safety, but there are a few evidences, such as datestamps of directories on disk, datestamps of the created disk itself and BAM in block 881. |
13 September 2017, 15:27 | #6 |
Amiga Collector
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 41
Posts: 679
|
With collections it is always a weighing up if you want to add disk images when there is the collection available on CD. Best example is the Fred Fish Collections. So i'm not sure on this too.
|
13 September 2017, 15:42 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Age: 49
Posts: 2,951
|
Another example is the 17Bit collection
It's not in TOSEC even if it would be very easy to add those disks So, i guess it's a choice of the TOSEC staff |
13 September 2017, 15:48 | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spijkenisse / the Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
Given the livelihood of the AMOS community, I'm assuming that an ADF collection would be more welcome. I can of course place 2 or 3 created ADF's in the zone as a review, to see if you, the experts, would deem it viable as a potential TOSEC collection candidate. BTW: The collection spans 601 disks, but some are labelled as 'withdrawn' and thus not present on the cd-rom. Oh, the archive.org link as promised: https://archive.org/details/cdrom-amospdcd Ah, always good to learn, the TOSEC board needs to agree too of course I'll keep that in mind! |
|
13 September 2017, 15:53 | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Federativnaya Respublika Germaniya
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
This is not a series for its own, so no sperate section in TOSEC, not each single disk was produced by 17-Bit, they often take over existing releases. |
|
13 September 2017, 16:03 | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Age: 49
Posts: 2,951
|
So, we could say 17 Bit disks are hacks ?
|
13 September 2017, 16:08 | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Federativnaya Respublika Germaniya
Posts: 4,994
|
As i wrote, some are hacks, others are own productions, thats why no own section in TOSEC.
If we would handle this in its own section, a lot of disks would be missing there, because the disks are in other sections. Lokk in current release, some disks are named (17-Bit) as publisher, others are [h 17-Bit]. |
13 September 2017, 16:17 | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spijkenisse / the Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 525
|
Since I'm already recreating the AMOS PD collection adf images, I'm now using this filename convention, for instance:
Official Amos PD Library, The #012 (1990)(Weird Science)[a].adf As a TOSEC naming convention newbie, and very aware this might very well not make it to the official TOSEC set, would this name be correct? I'm using the [a] sign to mark it as an alternative version of the original amiga disk. Any insight / help is very much appreciated Last edited by onkelarie; 13 September 2017 at 16:23. |
13 September 2017, 16:23 | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Age: 49
Posts: 2,951
|
Onkelaire, for what i know, TOSEC staff is made by mai and Crashdisk
So, you must ask to them to be sure about naming covention |
13 September 2017, 16:26 | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spijkenisse / the Netherlands
Age: 54
Posts: 525
|
|
13 September 2017, 16:46 | #15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Federativnaya Respublika Germaniya
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
Official Amos PD Library #012, The (1990)(Tucker, Anne)[rebuilt].adf As said, for me its still unclear, how to handle this series, some disks are already in TOSEC, scattered in different sections! Maybe Crashdisk can say something about this topic, since he was maintainer of Collection sections too! |
|
13 September 2017, 17:32 | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Age: 49
Posts: 2,951
|
What kind of prods contains this Official AMOS PD Library ..... games ?
|
13 September 2017, 17:35 | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Age: 49
Posts: 2,951
|
So, mai, which are the features of a collection to be included in TOSEC ?
|
13 September 2017, 17:47 | #18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Federativnaya Respublika Germaniya
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
Each single disk should be unique, so created by the publisher of the collection, not a simple take over of disks published before! |
|
13 September 2017, 17:51 | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Italy
Age: 49
Posts: 2,951
|
And what about the PDSoft collection, is this one a unique collection or not ?
|
13 September 2017, 18:03 | #20 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Federativnaya Respublika Germaniya
Posts: 4,994
|
Quote:
BTW, if you use ADF-Workshop, you can see at startup the loaded databases, including unrenamed collections, which Crashdisk has categorized as real collections! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HELP: Opus5, KingCON, SysInfo.library (Sysmon.library) triangle | Michael | support.Apps | 6 | 10 March 2014 14:08 |
f/s Amiga Amos Programming books / Disks / Easy Amos & other Books *mega collection!* | fitzsteve | MarketPlace | 4 | 23 May 2012 04:35 |
Amos PD Library Release 2 for sale | forumbase | MarketPlace | 0 | 07 February 2006 18:32 |
Amos PD Library requests | superquake | request.Demos | 2 | 13 October 2005 10:51 |
Where's the amos.library on the 3-disk AMOS set? | andreas | support.Apps | 0 | 15 November 2001 16:04 |
|
|