15 March 2004, 15:23 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
ADFScan 1.8e
Last edited by derSammler; 05 June 2005 at 16:58. |
13 April 2004, 14:38 | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Milan - Italy
Age: 43
Posts: 124
|
very cool.
|
13 April 2004, 15:21 | #3 |
Fantasy Man!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,353
|
Any chance of it scanning sub/sub folders? i.e. if I tell it to scan my TOSEC folder, it doesn't find anything (with scan subdir turned on). It just seems to ignore subfolders completely.
The directory structure is: TOSEC >> LETTER >> Zips |
13 April 2004, 16:13 | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
@Enverex:
Quote:
Can you give me some more details ? (operating system, a sample filename with full path, etc.) |
|
13 April 2004, 16:28 | #5 |
Fantasy Man!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,353
|
The directory I gave it was "Y:\ac\amiga\tosec" and the OS is XP Pro. It seems to scan for ages then say there isn't anything in the folder.
|
13 April 2004, 16:40 | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
What is "Y:" ? If this is a virtual drive (network, subst, whatever...) it could be the problem. There may be a problem with more than 32768 files as well, but I was never able to confirm that.
|
13 April 2004, 17:39 | #7 |
Fantasy Man!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,353
|
Yeah, it's a mapped network drive, although nothing else I have ever used has had a problem with it as it normaly just acts like a normal drive.
42,105 files in 44 folders. |
13 April 2004, 17:45 | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
Quote:
I have to test it with a similar setup. I can't locate the error right now. |
|
13 April 2004, 18:47 | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 246
|
Nice work WindowsKiller
|
14 April 2004, 00:29 | #10 |
Zone Friend
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 151
|
WindowsKiller, Is it possible to scan .adz files?
|
14 April 2004, 12:08 | #11 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I'm behind you!
Posts: 3,763
|
What recognition file did you use windows killer? Your utility is extremely useful.
At the moment, I scan ADF's from within WinUAE using VirusZ or VirusEX, which use the XVS recognition file and other common libs. Obviously this limits performance. Your utility did find a saddam1 virus on a bubblebobble adf, but VirusEX/VirusZ both put this file in the clear using every scan option available. Any plans on adding HDF files to the scan? Last edited by Bloodwych; 14 April 2004 at 12:22. |
14 April 2004, 12:19 | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
@barkingboy: Not yet, because no one requested it so far.
@Bloodwych: It does not use a recognition file, everything was written by me. |
14 April 2004, 12:26 | #13 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I'm behind you!
Posts: 3,763
|
I edited my last post Windowskiller, adding a few more points.
Well done for writing such a utility - makes life easier when handling ADFs, thank you. |
14 April 2004, 12:53 | #14 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
14 April 2004, 13:24 | #15 | |
Zone Friend
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
It is a neat utility so keep up the good work |
|
14 April 2004, 15:28 | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
@Enverex: Bug confirmed, more than 32767 files are not supported. Fixing this requires a huge rewrite. :eek
@barkingboy: Okay, let's see how much work this would be... |
14 April 2004, 16:36 | #17 |
Fantasy Man!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,353
|
Its ok anyway, I have got Virus Z III running now with the latest stuff and its super fast and does all I need anyway. Cheers for trying.
|
14 April 2004, 16:48 | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
I'll fix it anyway, but probably not with the next version. But I've already added a work-around.
|
15 April 2004, 15:47 | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
|
Good news! The 32767 files limit was caused by a list box. There's no way to store more than 32767 entries in a list box so I thought it would need a huge rewrite but I was wrong. I've removed the list box and replaced it with a self-written class which offers the same functions. I didn't even had to change any line of the code.
|
15 April 2004, 16:21 | #20 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I'm behind you!
Posts: 3,763
|
Great News! Now I only have to collect that many files to make use of the fix! Some of you with broadband must have impressive collections.
Don't worry enverex, I won't ask for your collection in the zone! Last edited by Bloodwych; 15 April 2004 at 16:46. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|