18 December 2021, 15:25 | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ulm / GER
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
|
|
22 December 2021, 19:01 | #22 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Finland
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
I'm relatively new to the world of Amiga acceleration, but I can say that at least the ACA500+ I have has been working very reliably for four years now, and the firmware updates came out pretty fast when they were needed after the card's release, considering it's basically a one-man company. It was/is super easy to install the updates, too. Not that there's anything wrong with the classic cards either, it's just that they are far too pricey nowadays! |
|
22 December 2021, 22:14 | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Espoo/Finland
Posts: 50
|
Quite expensive, but then again these days everything is...
|
25 December 2021, 07:46 | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: US
Posts: 315
|
I've been using the Blizzard 1230 for years in my desktop 1200, which serves WHDLoad and (old) demoscene duty. I've also had Apollo, DKB, and GVP '030 cards, and briefly ran benchmark tests some years back with a friend's 55 MHz ACA1233.
The ACA1234 is an utterly fantastic card! The latest update allows for toggling the instruction cache for chipram. No problem now with Nexus7 and a few other demos, and this also resolves a few (very minor) WHDLoad anomalies I noted vs my Blizzard 1230 (mainly, a small number of games seemed to load slower in some segments, although game compatibility itself appeared identical). Nearly 9 MB/s raw read here using the onboard CF slot (some cards may perform better), 8 MB/s write in SysSpeed. AIBB shows a healthy boost over the Blizzard, and also the Apollo and GVP 1230 cards--it even handily bests the latter clocked at 56 MHz in all but one test. Chipram read/write is superior to the Blizzard (bustest), and writing to onboard memory bests the previous 1233/55, although the latter is still slightly better performing overall in most (not all!) AIBB tests due to the clockspeed difference. Though not really needed, all the card requires for utter perfection is a 55 MHz overclock option. |
27 September 2023, 04:47 | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Raleigh/USA
Posts: 9
|
I got an ACA1234 for my amiga and I try to use the acatool. I downloaded it, I extracted it and I get an acatool-3.4 folder. I click the icon so I can get the GUI but nothing happens.
Have you seen this problem? |
03 October 2023, 10:39 | #26 | |
PSPUAE DEV
|
Quote:
Does it have a GUI? what happens if you run from CLI? |
|
04 October 2023, 13:47 | #27 |
MI clan prevails
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,443
|
There has been GUI for a while now. It works well with my ACA1233n.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New A500 68030 accelerator from Elbox | Bamiga2002 | News | 115 | 19 February 2015 16:07 |
Wanted Amiga 1200 Accelerator card | Mike UK | MarketPlace | 6 | 06 September 2011 13:11 |
Harms 68030 Accelerator for A500 | Kai | Hardware mods | 2 | 05 May 2011 14:07 |
Wanted: Amiga 4000 68030 card | r.cade | MarketPlace | 11 | 17 March 2008 21:51 |
Amiga A1200 68030 Accelerator with 32meg ram for sale.. | Big-Byte | MarketPlace | 1 | 12 February 2006 19:43 |
|
|