Amiga or not ? - Page 2

8bitbubsy · 13 October 2020, 13:26

Yep. Extended periods and xCHN/xxCH (1..9 and 10..99) magic ID in header. Then there's the replen of 0 for non-looping samples, that some trackers erroneously write during saving (at least FT2 is confirmed to do this).
Anyhow, the detection is still not guranteed to be right (especially if the ID is M.K./M!K!). I've also seen a .mod that I think came from an Amiga tracker, thad had pattern periods that were not matching the original .mod period table.

13 October 2020, 13:26	#21
8bitbubsy Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Norway Posts: 1,709	Yep. Extended periods and xCHN/xxCH (1..9 and 10..99) magic ID in header. Then there's the replen of 0 for non-looping samples, that some trackers erroneously write during saving (at least FT2 is confirmed to do this). Anyhow, the detection is still not guranteed to be right (especially if the ID is M.K./M!K!). I've also seen a .mod that I think came from an Amiga tracker, thad had pattern periods that were not matching the original .mod period table.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)