14 August 2006, 02:54 | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Exeter
Age: 39
Posts: 970
|
Cyberstorm PPC vs Blizzard PPC CPU Speed Comparison
Hey Yo!
How much more faster is a 604/e@233mhz compared to a 603/e@240mhz? Is there a noticable difference in speed? Regards, |
14 August 2006, 05:12 | #2 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
i believe one of them is factory over clocked ppc chip and 603e was 040 ?
hmmm i might be wrong on the latter... they did make quite a few in series. |
14 August 2006, 10:34 | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: finland
Posts: 1,843
|
game speeds
|
14 August 2006, 16:20 | #4 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
some of them number are confusing zipper...
where as a: ppc 603e @240mhz with 040 96MB ram (and voodoo3) manages out-perform ppc 603e @240mhz with 060 128MB ram (and voodoo3) to the tune of nearly 15% and in some cases 200% baffling... i wonder if its software optimisation.... or atleast in some part library revision. |
14 August 2006, 16:28 | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Exeter
Age: 39
Posts: 970
|
Hey Yo!
Good link there zipper, thanks. Those are weird figures lol OK. Say if the 060 was overclocked to 66mhz, would that 603e be faster than an 040 603e? Regards, -EDIT- Here is a good link: http://babel.altavista.com/translate...igaspeed.de.vu Last edited by CU_AMiGA; 14 August 2006 at 16:38. |
14 August 2006, 17:09 | #6 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
thinking about it, if there using the PPC optimised version of the quake engine, then realisically there is going to be very little ot no differnece upon the 68k side processor...
if however there using 68k optimised code, then realisticall whats the point of PPC? |
14 August 2006, 18:18 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UmeƄ
Age: 43
Posts: 935
|
The way the PowerUP dual-cpu system works in conjunction with PowerUP/WarpOS, the 68k cpu needs to do quite a lot of housekeeping work for the PPC cpu, so the faster 68k cpu you have, the faster your PowerUp/WarpOS applications will run, even if the PPC cpu is clocked the same.
|
14 August 2006, 21:49 | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: finland
Posts: 1,843
|
To get good results you need to keep the background tasks at minimum and free ram at maximum and defragmented..
|
14 August 2006, 22:08 | #9 | |
Amiga is my Religion
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2012, 14:25 | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 245
|
Sorry bad news,this could be the last year cyberstorm ppc holds this crown.
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=18620 Last edited by delshay; 15 March 2012 at 14:30. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Sale: Cyberstorm PPC 060 50mhz / PPC 330mhz + 128mb / OS4.1 Classic | fitzsteve | MarketPlace | 2 | 18 June 2013 12:39 |
FS: Blizzard PPC 060@66MHz/PPC@330MHz with SCSI + 128MB RAM | stachu100 | MarketPlace | 3 | 23 November 2011 11:42 |
FS: Blizzard PPC 060@66MHz/PPC@330MHz with SCSI + 128MB RAM | stachu100 | MarketPlace | 1 | 15 March 2011 23:46 |
Cyberstorm PPC hardware mod: 060@72MHz/PPC@396MHz | stachu100 | Hardware mods | 7 | 30 April 2010 15:26 |
Blizzard PPC FSB speed.... | keropi | support.Hardware | 6 | 11 August 2005 07:25 |
|
|