English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 22 June 2022, 21:27   #1
NunoUFO
Registered User
 
NunoUFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 134
Blizzard 1220 VS TF1230

Hi all,

I've just purchased an A1200 which came with a Blizzaed 1220.
Whilst it provides a certain improvement, I'm looking to get a good speed boost and also good 3D graphics performance.

Would you recommend me to keep this one or get a TF1230 68030?

Thank you in advance for your comments and help.

NunoUFO is offline  
Old 22 June 2022, 22:51   #2
supaduper
Registered User
 
supaduper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Krypton
Posts: 1,210
Or if you can stretch your budget go for a TF1260
supaduper is offline  
Old 22 June 2022, 23:11   #3
Leon Besson
Banned
 
Leon Besson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Anywhere and everywhere I have a contract
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by NunoUFO View Post
Hi all,

I've just purchased an A1200 which came with a Blizzaed 1220.
Whilst it provides a certain improvement, I'm looking to get a good speed boost and also good 3D graphics performance.

Would you recommend me to keep this one or get a TF1230 68030?

Thank you in advance for your comments and help.

The worlds your oyster Bromigo! When it comes to accelerators.

You need to delve further into what you want to achieve here?

You mention “good 3D graphics performance”. But 3D graphics performance with what exactly?

A 1230 (68030) for some is a vast improvement over a 68020 CPU. But will that be enough for you?

Don’t forget if you purchase one of these newer accelerator cards then you will be joining those who will be tinkering with them with newer firmware’s to get what you want out of it. Are you prepared to do that?
Leon Besson is offline  
Old 23 June 2022, 07:28   #4
jlin_au
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Fadden ACT Australia
Posts: 128
Go for a Blizzard 1230 Mk IV with its 680RC30 (50Mhz w/ MMU) and real time clock (RTC) as you can add up to 128 Mb of fast ram to the standard card w/o the SCSI expansion card. The 128 Mb fast ram is compatible with a PCMCIA card in 4 Mb PCMCIA slot address range.

Or you could look at a Terriblefire TF1230 (68030) or TF1260 (68060) card w/o RTC, w/ its extra RAM and 2nd IDE interface (requires extra software patch).

A Blizzard 1220 gives you a 28Mhz 680EC20 with an RTC and either 4 or 8 MB of Fast ram with the upper 4Mb of any 8Mb RAM conflicting with some PCMCIA cards in the 4MB PCMCIA slot address space.
jlin_au is offline  
Old 23 June 2022, 15:01   #5
NunoUFO
Registered User
 
NunoUFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by supaduper View Post
Or if you can stretch your budget go for a TF1260
Wish I could, depends on how much I can sell my 1220 for. I've purchased an 86662 FPU which I plan to add.

My question is which option is the best all rounder if it makes sense

thank you
Nuno
NunoUFO is offline  
Old 23 June 2022, 15:03   #6
NunoUFO
Registered User
 
NunoUFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon Besson View Post
The worlds your oyster Bromigo! When it comes to accelerators.

You need to delve further into what you want to achieve here?

You mention “good 3D graphics performance”. But 3D graphics performance with what exactly?

A 1230 (68030) for some is a vast improvement over a 68020 CPU. But will that be enough for you?

Don’t forget if you purchase one of these newer accelerator cards then you will be joining those who will be tinkering with them with newer firmware’s to get what you want out of it. Are you prepared to do that?
To be fair I'm only looking to do retro gaming and some Doom and other more 3D slightly demanding games.
NunoUFO is offline  
Old 23 June 2022, 15:04   #7
NunoUFO
Registered User
 
NunoUFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlin_au View Post
Go for a Blizzard 1230 Mk IV with its 680RC30 (50Mhz w/ MMU) and real time clock (RTC) as you can add up to 128 Mb of fast ram to the standard card w/o the SCSI expansion card. The 128 Mb fast ram is compatible with a PCMCIA card in 4 Mb PCMCIA slot address range.

Or you could look at a Terriblefire TF1230 (68030) or TF1260 (68060) card w/o RTC, w/ its extra RAM and 2nd IDE interface (requires extra software patch).

A Blizzard 1220 gives you a 28Mhz 680EC20 with an RTC and either 4 or 8 MB of Fast ram with the upper 4Mb of any 8Mb RAM conflicting with some PCMCIA cards in the 4MB PCMCIA slot address space.
Hi, the Blizzard 1230 Mk IV is a bit outside my budget. Again it depends on how much I get for the 1220..

Thank you
NunoUFO is offline  
Old 23 June 2022, 15:38   #8
trixster
Guru Meditating
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: England
Posts: 2,337
Doom will still be too slow on a TF1230.

Amiga first person shooters like Gloom and Alien Breed 3D will benefit from the extra speed of the TF1230, but AB3D2 and PC ports of stuff like Doom, DukeNukem and Quake are far too slow still.

The Bliz 1220/4 gives 5.05 Mips, a TF1230 will give about 10 Mips. For the vast majority of amiga games the 1220/4 will be just fine.
trixster is offline  
Old 23 June 2022, 18:30   #9
Lord Aga
MI clan prevails
 
Lord Aga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,443
I would stay with that Blizzard. It is an awesome card, and you can have tons of fun with it before needing something more powerful.
Lord Aga is offline  
Old 23 June 2022, 21:37   #10
Leon Besson
Banned
 
Leon Besson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Anywhere and everywhere I have a contract
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by NunoUFO View Post
Wish I could, depends on how much I can sell my 1220 for. I've purchased an 86662 FPU which I plan to add.

My question is which option is the best all rounder if it makes sense

thank you
Nuno
Best all rounder is a 1230 with an FPU if planning to do 3D productivity. I’ve always been a keen advocate of the classic accelerators such as the Blizzard 1230 MVIV. There are other ones like Apollo MK2 and MK3 1230 cards as well, although a few of those run moderately slower.

A TF1230 is all well and good, but no FPU option currently exists on that card.

For power a 1260. For ultimate power then you are looking at FPGA such as a Vampire.

See how you fair with the 1220 as that is good enough for Whdload games and demos.

As for Doom the. You need a 1260 or a Vampire card

Laters Mang!
Leon Besson is offline  
Old 24 June 2022, 00:17   #11
NunoUFO
Registered User
 
NunoUFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon Besson View Post
Best all rounder is a 1230 with an FPU if planning to do 3D productivity. I’ve always been a keen advocate of the classic accelerators such as the Blizzard 1230 MVIV. There are other ones like Apollo MK2 and MK3 1230 cards as well, although a few of those run moderately slower.

A TF1230 is all well and good, but no FPU option currently exists on that card.


For power a 1260. For ultimate power then you are looking at FPGA such as a Vampire.

See how you fair with the 1220 as that is good enough for Whdload games and demos.

As for Doom the. You need a 1260 or a Vampire card

Laters Mang!
Thanks Mang, I think I will get the 1230 as my 1220 doesn't let me play any AGA WHDLoad games as it keeps saying I don't have enough Shadow Mem...
NunoUFO is offline  
Old 24 June 2022, 00:27   #12
Leon Besson
Banned
 
Leon Besson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Anywhere and everywhere I have a contract
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by NunoUFO View Post
Thanks Mang, I think I will get the 1230 as my 1220 doesn't let me play any AGA WHDLoad games as it keeps saying I don't have enough Shadow Mem...
No Worries Bromigo!

Try installing and configuring this as a cheaper method for now;

https://eab.abime.net/showthread.php?t=105824
Leon Besson is offline  
Old 24 June 2022, 09:30   #13
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,861
An FPU can also be installed on the A1200 motherboard if you really need one with a TF1230.
Jope is offline  
Old 24 June 2022, 14:39   #14
Kin Hell
0ld0r Git
 
Kin Hell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by NunoUFO View Post
Hi all,

I've just purchased an A1200 which came with a Blizzaed 1220.
Whilst it provides a certain improvement, I'm looking to get a good speed boost and also good 3D graphics performance.

Would you recommend me to keep this one or get a TF1230 68030?

Thank you in advance for your comments and help.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jope View Post
An FPU can also be installed on the A1200 motherboard if you really need one with a TF1230.
If you put a 68882 FPU on the Mobo, it will run at 14Mhz like the onboard CPU. There will also be wait-states invoked when using your Blizzard 1220/4 which has a 28Mhz CPU. - Don't do this.
Fit the 68882 to the Blizzard 1220/4 & depending on the part number of the 68882 you have purchased, be sure the X-Tal on the Blizzard 1220/4 matches the speed of the 68882.
A lot of PLCC style 33Mhz 68882's will run @ 40Mhz if you're lucky enough in the PLCC Silicon Lottery.

RE the Ram on the Blizzard 1220/4:

If you have the Add-4 Board Memory Expansion, this will give you 8Mb Fast Ram, which is better than 4Mb, though you might then get PCMCIA issues.
4Mb is a tad tight for WHDLoad. Bearing in mind the Blizzard 1220/4 is fitted with DIP chips which are slower/higher Latency than 72 Pin SIMM's.

The Blizzard 1230 gives you up to 128Mb on a Single 72 Pin SIMM & no PCMCIA issues. Also, this is a 68030 @ 50Mhz with an FPU of up to 50Mhz if you use the PGA style 68882.

My money would be for the Blizzard 1230 over the TF1230 if you want Floating Point calculations.
If you don't want Floating Point Calculations, get the TF1230 68030.

Too many "If's" can cause confusion, so in an effort to appease the abuse of "if" in this post, please consider these:

If all you want to do is play games, the 1220/4, even if a tad tight for WHDLoad & only 4Mb ram, save your money all round.
If you don't want to use Desktop publishing or 3D Ray-tracing software, the 68882 you have bought is a waste of time all together.

A 50Mhz CPU & FPU is like waiting for paint to dry, but then even a 40Mhz FPU with a 28Mhz 020 will be like waiting for Hell to freeze over.
Kin Hell is offline  
Old 24 June 2022, 14:41   #15
Leon Besson
Banned
 
Leon Besson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Anywhere and everywhere I have a contract
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jope View Post
An FPU can also be installed on the A1200 motherboard if you really need one with a TF1230.
Yeah followed Chris Edwards YouTube video on this with a new RE-Amiga board. Somehow my board no longer works (Green screen). Tried everything and managed to get a garbled screen afterwards. Now off to a trusted Electrical professional I use to hopefully get it fixed

Moral Mang! If you are confident with a soldering iron and know what you are doing, then yes this is an option.
Leon Besson is offline  
Old 25 June 2022, 12:03   #16
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,861
Yep, don't make mistakes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kin Hell View Post
If you put a 68882 FPU on the Mobo, it will run at 14Mhz like the onboard CPU. There will also be wait-states invoked when using your Blizzard 1220/4 which has a 28Mhz CPU. - Don't do this.
I was talking specifically about installing a motherboard FPU with the TF1230, which can't have an FPU on board. If you have an accelerator or mem expansion with an FPU socket, why on earth would you fit one on the motherboard. Sounds DUMB?! XDD XD

Also there was some enterprising soul who cut the 14MHz line and successfully fed the motherboard FPU with a faster clock.

These are OPTIONS, I'm not forcing anyone to do anything.

Last edited by Jope; 25 June 2022 at 12:16.
Jope is offline  
Old 25 June 2022, 12:20   #17
utri007
mä vaan
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,653
For most 3D games and Amiga minium CPU is 68040.

With 68030 Doom is just too slow.
utri007 is offline  
Old 25 June 2022, 16:06   #18
Leon Besson
Banned
 
Leon Besson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Anywhere and everywhere I have a contract
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by utri007 View Post
For most 3D games and Amiga minium CPU is 68040.

With 68030 Doom is just too slow.
68040 CPUs also run too hot and can be unstable as well

You might as well bite the bullet and go 68060 in my opinion
Leon Besson is offline  
Old 25 June 2022, 19:07   #19
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,861
All in!

The 040 seems to be the worst choice for a WHDLoad machine in my experience. Some slaves that work on the 030 and 060 have trouble.

The 030 seems to be the most compatible in a WHDLoad machine, but the 060 is a good second.
Jope is offline  
Old 25 June 2022, 19:27   #20
Superman
Super Member
 
Superman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Wakefield
Age: 48
Posts: 1,334
There is also the option of a Tsunami 1230 which does have and FPU but seems quite a bit more expensive than the TF 1230. I have a TF1230 and it’s great for my needs.
Superman is online now  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blizzard 1220/4 battery N-Ed support.Hardware 18 30 May 2012 11:37
FS: Blizzard 1220 MK IV ami_junkie MarketPlace 12 14 April 2010 13:16
Blizzard 1220 card ami_junkie support.Hardware 14 09 March 2010 14:29
Blizzard 1220/4 hughie support.Hardware 1 27 February 2005 02:14
deactivate Blizzard 1220/4 ??? PiCiJi support.Hardware 1 05 October 2004 09:34

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:59.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.13720 seconds with 15 queries