![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
|
Should I Pistorm my 500/1000 or 1200?
I'm curious to try a Pistorm, and note that versions are available either as a 68000 socket or 1200 trapdoor.
I was thinking I'd put it in my 1200 until I considered that it's already fairly good spec. It has 8+2MB RAM and a 68881, it's got OK video out (via GBS control), it's got a CF Flash HD plus it's 020. If a Pistorm gives a 500 or 1000 all of the above is it reasonable to conclude that it's a much more worthwhile upgrade for those that leaves things in the same spot by adding hi-res RTG, RAM, speed and hard disk? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: australia
Posts: 585
|
I'm doing it to my rev.6A board, but then that's going into a big-box, which makes it easier for external cabling blabla ... I probably wouldn't do it to a replete stock A500 ; they're worth more unmolested =)
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2021
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 124
|
I think you need to ask yourself, what do you hope to achieve, what do you want to run,play? What do you do on your 500 that you can't on the 1200 ?
One possible way to go, upgrade the 1200, you then have a really excellent high end amiga, plus you then have the fall back of the 500 for the remote possibility of a small amount of really old software not liking the 1200.... You say the 1200 is fairly high spec, processing wise its pretty stock really, a fpu that's hardly used and some fast mem, the PS32 is many many orders of magnitude faster both on processor and storage speed..... Last edited by itsmedoofer; 14 September 2023 at 08:39. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,667
|
The A1000 is a bad candidate due to its chip-ram limitation.
I would opt for the A500, as it's a greater improvement. Like it allows you to play many games that support AGA and RTG only (e.g. Simon the Sorcerer 2), which would run on the A1200 even without the PiStorm. I did install it in an A500 as well (my options were A500, A600, A1200). Quote:
Last edited by derSammler; 14 September 2023 at 08:34. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,955
|
I would opt for the A1200 because the A500 is just so slow that if you want to do anything with native graphics modes, stuff will crawl regardless of the fast CPU.
Also the A500 is more difficult with regards to data transfer. The A1200 has a PCMCIA socket where you can plug in a network card or memory card adapter to move data in/out instead of having to turn off the Amiga and yanking your boot drive. And another matter of preference; a specific turbo card slot is much more elegant and robust than pulling chips and shoving riser cards in their place. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: oslo/norway
Posts: 1,637
|
A1200 without a doubt. You will even be able to disable Pistorm32 with a simple keypress and run the original 020 if you like. Think about all the nice AGA demo stuff!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,667
|
Quote:
The A1200 is and always was easy to upgrade. You could get a PPC accelerator for it. It's nothing special. But the A500 was not. Turning the A500 into a powerhouse is a much more satisfying experience. It's also worth noting that the original PiStorm is more mature than the PiStorm32, which still has some nasty bugs and compatibility issues. Last edited by derSammler; 14 September 2023 at 09:07. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: France
Posts: 524
|
A1200 is just a matter of plugging the card on the expansion port, unlike others which need to tinkle with CPU and sockets and remove native CPU.
Besides, i am under the impression it works better in the 1200 version with the chip ram speed but i may be wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
0ld0r Git
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,726
|
Quote:
![]() @ Port89 Definitely A1200 for more native speed & much better connectivity all round. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2021
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 124
|
Not really the case since Beta 2.1, compatability is now excellent, mainly things that use SMC are the problem, quirks with the fpu have recently been identified, fixes identified and currently being implemented. Certainly not aware of any nasty bugs, care to elaborate, or maybe report them on GIT ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Another way of asking might be "Is a 1200 with Pistorm materially better than a 500 with Pistorm"? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,955
|
Quote:
Can you understand relative slowness and fastness? The speed difference is noticeable between ECS and AGA, especially when the screen depth is higher. It is also noticeable between an A500 030 and an A3000 030. I also own an A500/030 and an A3000/030 in case this means anything. And likewise, I would mainly use RTG myself. However a friend of mine who just got his PiStorm A500 running loves 15kHz CRT action on his Amiga. He actively tries to run many things over the CRT even though my comment is usually that it will not necessarily be nice and playable compared to RTG. However I don't forbid him or chide him for it, just try to set his expectations. I still stand behind my opinion that the 500 is the worse choice if you get to choose between A500/A1200, because the A1200 is a better platform for CPU expansions regardless of how those expansions are implemented. Personally I prefer the A4000 though, you don't have to plug as many things upside down on top of chips in those machines, but have actual expansion slots for things. However no PiStorm for the Fast Slot, so it's the wrong thread for that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2021
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
|
All very good points, which turned this into an expensive question.
I've ordered both. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: france
Posts: 269
|
Same here. Pistorm everywhere !
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,955
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
0ld0r Git
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,726
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Germany
Posts: 61
|
this riddle is hard to resolve for me too:
already have pistorm in A500 with musashi (cos I need the network connection) with rgb2hdmi giving me brilliant native picture in games and wb. Ok this is no ideal games machine. Cannot go emu68 here, will have no network. I want to go even faster with emu68 in my A1200, but: -don't have rgb2hdmi, which is sad. Don't have fast network, need to use my slow wifi card instead -this machine is already a brilliant whdload machine -what should I do with my blizzard 1230/50? Sell it to fund my pistorm32? keep it in a warm and cozy place? -isn't it enough? what will I use it for So my mouse pointer keeps turning circles over the pistorm32 buy button :-o So I know sometime I will hit the buy button just for the peace of mind :-) Last edited by huggy70; 15 September 2023 at 18:29. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
0ld0r Git
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,726
|
Click it now!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Germany
Posts: 61
|
I will, no doubt
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amiga 500+ with pistorm and RGB/HDMI | ianoakley | MarketPlace | 0 | 13 October 2021 14:30 |
Amiga 1000 Kickstart ROM and PiStorm | videofx | support.Hardware | 2 | 28 August 2021 20:56 |
Amiga 1000 Software on 500 | Weemus | Amiga scene | 11 | 09 May 2012 04:48 |
Amiga 1000 and a DataFlyer 500? | EvilCensor | support.Hardware | 4 | 09 March 2010 03:54 |
WTB: Amiga 600, 500, 500 +, 1200 (NTSC) | JeremyDay | MarketPlace | 2 | 30 November 2006 03:27 |
|
|