English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > News

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 17 September 2016, 13:48   #181
PortuguesePilot
Global Moderator
 
PortuguesePilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Setúbal, Portugal
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetr0 View Post
Whats the Expense:
Hmmm you would need an interface from the 68EC020 to the new 68040/60 - essentially another board - where in fact it would be cheaper to redesign one from scratch. Sadly obtaining enough 040 and or 060 CPU's that are known working and financially viable - as well to hold a warranty - is the limiting factor here.
Well, I'm aware that a new board would have to be projected from scratch. I was just admiring the strengths of the Furia and wondering a "what if" scenario of what a 68040 or even a 68060 design would accomplish. With the fierce competition of the Vampire 2, the Furia would have to need some sort of edge over it (other than being immediately available) to be competitive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetr0 View Post
Well it is, just massively impractical - one could argue (and rightly so) that its not mass market possible - so hence the success of the Vampire / Apollo '080 Core projects.
So it goes down to the impracticality of it all, then? I understand. But still, a pity. A full 68040/68060 board would be very fast and still preserve original hardware, without resorting to FPGA chips, hence the edge the Furia would have over the massively performing Vampire 2. Their numbers are waning after the whole Vampire 2 affair, but there are still some hardware purists around that would absolutely jump on a 68040/68060 board. I feel that the 68EC020 just isn't competitive enough - despite all the good hallmarks of the Furia - and is holding it back a bit... That's why I asked: if such a board were to be made, how much more expensive would it be over the current Furia?
PortuguesePilot is offline  
Old 17 September 2016, 14:47   #182
Zetr0
Ya' like it Retr0?
 
Zetr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
In my personal opinion here, I would say that it is price verses performance. Interestingly you can add value to the product for not much extra cost.

Of course the Vampire2 spanks quite hard in this area, but at a current cost of 150 Euros and a very long waiting time will be off putting to some, with the Furia020 its available now to buy for about 100 Euro's.

What would give the Furia a better edge, well again in my opinion a few things for the developer to look at -
  • Add a cheap USB JTAG + software with Rescue Mode for the for the Furia020 that can be used on the PC
  • Make the product over all cheaper - get it to market for 70/80 Euros *[1]
  • Add a PGA socket as an optional replacement of the TQFP 020EC - thus can run 20/030 PGA CPU's*[2]
  • I would also look at obtaining a 3.x Kickrom License to bundle with the hardware. *[3]

*[1]To reduce cost perhaps the quickest way would be remove the on board RAM and off-load it to a 72pin DRAM SIMM
*[2]keep the TQFP020@25 but have the option to run a PGA 030@50MHz since the ram is not on the board and off-loaded to a 72PIN SIMM the board would have space for a PGA socket. Having a non EC CPU in the PGA socket would also allow for more memory via the 72PIN SIMM port so that you wouldn't be limited to the 8MB Z2 space as well as being PCMCIA friendly in lets call it "PGA" mode - so you can run the PCMCIA device till your hearts content.
*[3]This is a small cost by volume but adds a lot of value to the product as the user no longer needs to worry about upgrading the Kickstart ROM to make the most of their machine - its already there for the user to use - given time make it re-programable for the user to develop their own Kickstart ROM with a back up - fail safe - feature.

All that and keep it at 70/80 Euro's for the end user - That would be the edge this adaptor could leverage and sell a lot more units as it would be close to half the price of a Vampire V2 and seriously outperforms the ACA620 and the ACA630 - in fact any 020 or 030 based upgrade for the A600 - IMHO.

Last edited by Zetr0; 17 September 2016 at 15:13.
Zetr0 is offline  
Old 17 September 2016, 16:01   #183
idrougge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,332
A 040 or 060 accelerator would be at a great disadvantage compared to the Vampire. The CPU itself would raise the cost a lot, as would the more complex interfacing, the board layout would be more complex and in the end you would have a board that cost twice as much (or more) as a Vampire, with a fraction of the power and none of the bells and whistles of the Vamp.

All the Fúria's current advantages – availability and cost – would be rendered void.

What should be within reach would be a 030 accelerator. It would offer the advantage of bigger memory expansion, no PCMCIA conflicts and an MMU – the latter of which the Vampire is still far away from acquiring.

That being said — does anyone know the purpose of the jumpers on the Fúria board?

Last edited by DH; 17 September 2016 at 16:02. Reason: Back to back posts
idrougge is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 11:00   #184
derSammler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zetr0 View Post
Of course the Vampire2 spanks quite hard in this area, but at a current cost of 150 Euros and a very long waiting time will be off putting to some, with the Furia020 its available now to buy for about 100 Euro's.
Things changed a bit, since the Vampire is 250€ now (or 289€ if you want the "Black" edition). Not a smart move in my opinion, as that is way too much for an FPGA based card. I guess more people will now buy the Furia instead.
derSammler is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 11:26   #185
AJCopland
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Beeston, Nottinghamshire, UK
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcGTW_Webmaster View Post
Things changed a bit, since the Vampire is 250€ now (or 289€ if you want the "Black" edition). Not a smart move in my opinion, as that is way too much for an FPGA based card. I guess more people will now buy the Furia instead.
I don't think it's a matter of being "smart" but what it costs. They've been selling the pre-ordered cards at a loss, then new orders at break-even. With the increase in demand they've had to switch to professional manufacturing to meet the demand which adds further costs.

Even at €250 I'm not sure they're making any money out of it, just covering costs plus a tiny safety margin.

I have a Furia and a Vampire 2 (600, post-preorder price) by the way and I'm very glad that I bought it ages ago! However the new higher prices wouldn't deter me now and I'm still wanting one for my A1200, CD32 & A4000D
AJCopland is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 11:30   #186
majsta
www.majsta.com
 
majsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Banjaluka/Republic of Srpska
Age: 43
Posts: 448
Furia is nice card and Boboo is nice person who inspired me number of times with his opensourced hardware. I was so happy to see that Furia did more that other "professional" manufacturers using near the same parts. It seems to me that Furia have better logic than them, or their intention was to slow things down on purpose? Beside FPGA stuff and in the terms when you work with original CPU I think that this card is best there is. Looking nicely I think that it will find way to the market. I m glad that there are other projects and to see things moving on that we are not in the situation that we see one mans show. One day I hope that we will unite in one team because probably that's what we need.
majsta is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 11:41   #187
derSammler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,645
@AJCopland:

But that's the second price increase they did since the card is for sale, and +100€ is huge! For that price increase alone you can get a Furia...

Also, when switching to professional manufacturing with higher quantities, the unit price normally goes down, not up.
derSammler is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 12:01   #188
TroyWilkins
Registered User
 
TroyWilkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 548
My understanding is that the costs of making the Vampire have gone up, not down, mainly the cost of the FPGA that is so vital to the project.
TroyWilkins is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 12:04   #189
TroyWilkins
Registered User
 
TroyWilkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 548
Personally, I want to get a Furia for my 600, and I also want to get a Vampire, although I'll get the Furia first, as I am well aware of the waiting period for a Vampire. And honestly, I want both, I don't see them as mutually exclusive, people can want one or the other or even both, or even neither, as there are other options out there. But the Furia sure looks like great value to me, that doesn't mean that the Vampire isn't also great value, considering what you get.

Anyway, a Furia is next on my purchase list
TroyWilkins is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 13:44   #190
Zetr0
Ya' like it Retr0?
 
Zetr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
@majsta / BoBoo
I would love to see a Furia 030 - replace the memory with fast SRAM, one could have a zero wait-state 030@50 with FPU - you wouldn't get any faster speed than that outside a Vampire, I know of a few companies that have large amounts of QFP 030's @ 40MHz


Quote:
Originally Posted by pcGTW_Webmaster View Post
Things changed a bit, since the Vampire is 250€ now (or 289€ if you want the "Black" edition). Not a smart move in my opinion, as that is way too much for an FPGA based card. I guess more people will now buy the Furia instead.
You are more than welcome to your opinion my friend, personally I would say that the 150 Euro was way too low for such an adaptor as it cripples any competition in that price bracket like the Furia which, knowing the cost of the components doesn't have that much of a margin. I have always felt a 200/250 Euro for the V2 would be better positioned in the market.

Perhaps an interesting fact thats not known outside production is that the Cyclone 3 FPGA chip essentially quadrupled in price (over night) since the take-over of Altera by Intel.

This happened right in the middle of building to orders - I think the guys did admiral work finishing off with that promise - I doubt you would find a commercial business that would do that today!

The two guys that have been making all the Vampire2's must be extremely exhausted knowing the order rate.

What stated as a hobbyist product has certainly come to fruition and I could be not prouder for the Apollo / Vampire Team - they have sweated, shed blood and tears no doubt but they have brought the community a glimpse into the power of FPGA technology for the Amiga as well as the potential of tomorrow - very exciting!.

Having a V2 I can certainly say its most assuredly worth 250 Euros if you have it for this hobby - if not sell some unnecessary stuff like family members - there is nothing on the market (68k at least) that can come anywhere near it, let alone for the A600!

Do you remember the time when the A600 was the most unloved of all desktop models?

not any more....
Zetr0 is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 13:58   #191
supaduper
Registered User
 
supaduper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Krypton
Posts: 1,210
@Zetro I fully agree my friend still £ for £ the best upgrade to seen on the A600 . The development team cannot control component prices and anyway they do it out of love for a machine that was unloved for many years, so I am fully behind them as most Amigans are
supaduper is offline  
Old 18 September 2016, 16:48   #192
idrougge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,332
The smartest thing the Vampire crew could do is raise the price of their card — selling it at a price that hardly broke even was decidedly non-smart since it meant they never had the cash to spare to buy necessary components at necessary quantities or to ever set up proper manufacturing (the Fúria is now made by Lotharek, who also makes the MiST, why couldn't he make Vampires as well?).



That being said — does anyone know what the SW1 and SW2 jumpers on the Fúria do?
idrougge is offline  
Old 19 September 2016, 10:38   #193
jack-3d
kLiker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brno / Czech Republic
Posts: 371
New firmware test result:



Official release soon. Stay tuned ;o)
jack-3d is offline  
Old 19 September 2016, 10:41   #194
TroyWilkins
Registered User
 
TroyWilkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 548
Nice!
TroyWilkins is offline  
Old 19 September 2016, 17:32   #195
Selur
Registered User
 
Selur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Poznan/Poland
Age: 47
Posts: 116
quite fast
Selur is offline  
Old 20 September 2016, 13:56   #196
jack-3d
kLiker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brno / Czech Republic
Posts: 371
I would say the fastest 020 accelerator ever made ;o)
jack-3d is offline  
Old 27 September 2016, 18:31   #197
Boboo_SK
Develop HW
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nitra / Slovakia
Posts: 101
@Zetr0
Two year old project.
Boboo_SK is offline  
Old 28 September 2016, 13:47   #198
idrougge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,332
Boboo, what is the use of the SW1/SW2 jumpers?
idrougge is offline  
Old 28 September 2016, 18:37   #199
Boboo_SK
Develop HW
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nitra / Slovakia
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by idrougge View Post
Boboo, what is the use of the SW1/SW2 jumpers?
Furia EC020 R2, SW1 and SW2 not used, Furia EC020 R1 jumpers for Multiplier ICS502.
Boboo_SK is offline  
Old 28 September 2016, 23:35   #200
idrougge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,332
So the card can't be switched off then?
idrougge is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2x New Low Cost Turbo Card for A600 "Fúria" venox Amiga scene 80 14 November 2012 11:38
TotalCalc and EC020 FPU bug? Leandro Jardim support.WinUAE 5 25 February 2012 20:25
The ST-01 Project HideawayStudio Amiga scene 16 29 July 2008 19:54
Project One rygar request.Old Rare Games 2 27 November 2007 01:20

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:32.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.13808 seconds with 16 queries