29 April 2006, 12:02 | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 40
Posts: 100
|
Blastar
Is it the case that this simply hasn't received an unmodified dump yet, or is it yet to be supported by CAPS?
I submitted a dump of this in my huge last batch but it wasn't accepted, so I was wondering what the situation is with this? M;. |
29 April 2006, 13:02 | #2 |
move.w #$4489,$dff07e
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk, UK
Age: 42
Posts: 2,351
|
I've got an original of Blastar too, so if another dump is needed then I could help...
|
29 April 2006, 14:38 | #3 |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
Well in fact even if the game works 100 %, IFW said that the game has been badly mastered.....hence the game won't be preserved....
|
29 April 2006, 19:33 | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 414
|
every copy so far is form the same incorrectly mastered copy.
we'd still like dumps of it, in the hope that one of them turns up correct.....however unlikely that is. perhaps the US version is correct if one exists... |
01 May 2006, 00:40 | #5 | |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 8,994
|
Quote:
what is the actual error? And does this apply to the Corkers Budget re-release? |
|
01 May 2006, 00:48 | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 40
Posts: 100
|
I'm quite curious as to how this incorrect mastering error affects your ability to preserve the game.
Surely if the only copy of the game in PAL territories is the "incorrectly mastered" one, then this is the correct one to preserve, mastering errors and all? |
01 May 2006, 11:46 | #7 | |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
Yep Galahad, it applies to the corkers compilation, as i own it and have dumped the blastar disks....
Quote:
|
|
01 May 2006, 13:13 | #8 |
move.w #$4489,$dff07e
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk, UK
Age: 42
Posts: 2,351
|
Ok, well it's worth a try anyway. How do I go about making a dump for you guys - the SPS website said I should contact you...
|
01 May 2006, 14:23 | #9 |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 8,994
|
But what is the error? I am unaware of the error in the cracked version?
|
01 May 2006, 14:52 | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
we want to preserve the disk as it's supposed to be, if it turns out its supposed to be the way it is, then we'll create the relevent IPF. right now, we dont know and we're not going to release an IPF file of it, only to find that a good copy turns up later, and that the PAL versions dumped so far are indeed FAULTY (depite the fact maybe all of the PAL ones are). we'll then have an incorrectly preserved item. things that may help....confirmation of a US release.....contribution of the original master of the is game...... i realise our strict policy on perfection can be frustrating....but i'm affraid we wont be making exceptions just to get disk images out there for the sake of it. HTH |
|
01 May 2006, 14:54 | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
|
|
01 May 2006, 16:25 | #12 | |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 8,994
|
Quote:
A mastering error in this case doesn't equate that the image itself is bad. |
|
01 May 2006, 18:56 | #13 |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
One can finish the game with no bugs or error on screen, hence galahad reflection
|
02 May 2006, 13:19 | #14 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ...
Age: 52
Posts: 1,838
|
It is a block repeated twice.
Obviously a mastering problem and was not meant to be like that (the content repeats too), but you need to check all block information to notice it. |
02 May 2006, 14:00 | #15 | |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 8,994
|
Quote:
1). The game might not ever load that block 2). the game might load it but thats only because of an over read of data (i.e. loading more blocks than it actually needs) Crackdown / US Gold was a mastering error and we all know what the problem was with that, but has anyone in SPS actually worked out any nasty side effects of the duplicated block? Last edited by fiath; 02 May 2006 at 15:40. Reason: Pressed wrong button, lost test, lucky I found a locally cached copy, restored. Sorry Galahad! |
|
02 May 2006, 14:12 | #16 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ...
Age: 52
Posts: 1,838
|
I don't have the time to do that, so no. I can give you however the exact details and if you feel like tracing the disk accesses while completing the entire game...
|
02 May 2006, 15:16 | #17 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South East / UK
Age: 46
Posts: 1,930
|
Quote:
Games were not always mastered in the same batch, or even from the same master. Hence, we may find a PAL version from a different batch, or there may be a later/earlier version, or their might be a good copy from a different terratory (like the US). The point is finding those copies. If we release a version that "might be good" then this will detrimentally affect our ability to preserve a real copy - people assume what we have is good - because that has always been our policy - we only release what we know to be good. |
|
02 May 2006, 15:18 | #18 |
move.w #$4489,$dff07e
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk, UK
Age: 42
Posts: 2,351
|
As I said before I have a PAL version I could dump...
|
02 May 2006, 15:20 | #19 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South East / UK
Age: 46
Posts: 1,930
|
Musashi - great! Please mail contrib@softpres.org with details of your Amiga system. Thanks!
|
02 May 2006, 15:42 | #20 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South East / UK
Age: 46
Posts: 1,930
|
MMmmm, must remember to press QUOTE not EDIT next time...
Quote:
Even if the error does not affect the game at all in as far as you can test, we still wouldn't preserve it, because we can never know 100% from testing the game by playing it. We would much rather it stayed "missing" so people keep submitting dumps for it - this way we will probably eventually get it - this has worked *so many times* in the past now. It's almost a proven formula. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ripping Blastar | gifgit | project.Sprites | 11 | 04 September 2005 00:23 |
|
|