English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.WinUAE

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 20 March 2018, 18:48   #1
Rotareneg
Registered User
 
Rotareneg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 328
60 or 59.94 Hz for NTSC?

I was just curious if there was any reason to use a display refresh rate of 59.94 Hz instead of 60 Hz with WinUAE, or I guess more directly, which frame rate does WinUAE want to use in NTSC mode?
Rotareneg is offline  
Old 21 March 2018, 14:15   #2
Toni Wilen
WinUAE developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,540
It should not make any noticeably difference, except of course very tiny speed difference, that is invisible to running Amiga software = won't affect compatibility. 60Hz probably is better in normal vsync mode. Low latency vsync attempts to find exact rate but it is only supported in D3D9 mode.

Note that only interlace mode matches standard PAL/NTSC frame rate. Normal non-interlace mode is slightly slower. (~59.8Hz or so)

EDIT: Future "sliced" low latency mode probably changes everything.. (https://www.blurbusters.com/blur-bus...or-developers/)
Toni Wilen is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pal - Ntsc dr.mushroom New to Emulation or Amiga scene 26 12 April 2014 09:48
Agony NTSC Khyron request.Old Rare Games 6 12 October 2011 13:55
NTSC A500 Pal/NTSC mod pics kipper2k Hardware pics 2 29 March 2009 07:56
Gauntlet 2 NTSC Hungry Horace request.Old Rare Games 3 28 May 2008 14:33
Looking for an NTSC CD-32 Mangar MarketPlace 1 28 March 2005 15:15

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:49.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.06395 seconds with 13 queries