English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > New to Emulation or Amiga scene

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 22 February 2015, 18:58   #1
sev7en
Registered User
 
sev7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Qatar
Posts: 15
Floppy disk MacOS and AMIGA Emulation: The BEST Emulator... is?

Dear All,
first of all................, yes you deserve it, it is a wonderful community for a wonderful world.

I would ask you which one is the best emulator available for Mac OS X (Yosemite) if there is any specific thread to look for settings, tweaks and suggests.


Thanks and W AMIGA
sev7en is offline  
Old 22 February 2015, 20:24   #2
Nekoniaow
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by sev7en View Post
Dear All,
first of all................, yes you deserve it, it is a wonderful community for a wonderful world.

I would ask you which one is the best emulator available for Mac OS X (Yosemite) if there is any specific thread to look for settings, tweaks and suggests.

Thanks and W AMIGA
If you google "mac os x amiga emulator" (https://www.google.ca/search?client=...JOzE8geG24DIBw),
you will find that the first result is actually the only viable Amiga emulator option on OS X Yosemite: FS-UAE which is actively maintained by Frode Solheim (hence the FS). Also it's quite good.
Coincidentally, its support forum is also hosted by the English Amiga Board.

In the past there were several others but their maintainers were apparently too anemic to follow up with WinUAE's updates (that's the reference version of UAE). Frode on the other hand seems to be competent and motivated enough to last several decades.

The emulator: http://fs-uae.net
The support forum on EAB: http://eab.abime.net/forumdisplay.php?f=122

Last edited by Nekoniaow; 23 February 2015 at 02:22. Reason: Reformulated to avoid unintentional sarcasm.
Nekoniaow is offline  
Old 22 February 2015, 20:27   #3
TCD
HOL/FTP busy bee
 
TCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nekoniaow View Post
You know about this Google thing right?
Please refrain from this generic answer if a user asks about opinions when several options exist. Thank you.
TCD is offline  
Old 22 February 2015, 21:08   #4
Nekoniaow
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCD View Post
Please refrain from this generic answer if a user asks about opinions when several options exist. Thank you.
Didn't I take care to point to the result and give a properly supported answer (two paragraphs).
Where is the generic answer you are referring to?

As for the introductory humour, Google is a useful tool, and pointing out that it can be used is also a useful answer if the original poster didn't think of doing it.
"Teach a man to fish" they say.

I would never write something which might dissuade a newcomer, and I stand by my opinion that my answer was helpful.

With love and kittens.
Nekoniaow is offline  
Old 22 February 2015, 21:31   #5
TCD
HOL/FTP busy bee
 
TCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nekoniaow View Post
Where is the generic answer you are referring to?
Right there in your first sentence. As funny as it might seem to you, it's utterly pointless if the user doesn't ask for 'where can I find [x] on the internet'.

Really, it's just not worth opening your post like that
TCD is offline  
Old 23 February 2015, 02:17   #6
Nekoniaow
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by TCD View Post
Right there in your first sentence. As funny as it might seem to you, it's utterly pointless if the user doesn't ask for 'where can I find [x] on the internet'.

Really, it's just not worth opening your post like that
I still disagree that this initial sentence is pointless but I agree that using it at the opening sentence might act as an off putting cold shower for a newcomer so I have taken that into account and reformulated it in a hopefully more friendly manner.

Thanks for your comment!

Last edited by Nekoniaow; 23 February 2015 at 02:23.
Nekoniaow is offline  
Old 23 February 2015, 14:13   #7
sev7en
Registered User
 
sev7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Qatar
Posts: 15
Good afternoon,
thanks to all for the feedbacks. I was disappointed of the "initial sentence" of Mr.Nekonaiow because if we have to "ask to Google" we can close the forums as not necessary.
If I asked to you it's because, you are not Google but a community, then Mr.Nekoniaow maybe in Montreal there's a different way to take care of the things.

After that... I will do full immersion on that great world as I love the retrogaming area.


Kindly,
sev7en is offline  
Old 23 February 2015, 14:27   #8
Minuous
Coder/webmaster/gamer
 
Minuous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canberra/Australia
Posts: 2,629
Wouldn't the better option, if you must use MacOS, be to run WinUAE via WINE?
Minuous is offline  
Old 23 February 2015, 17:51   #9
sev7en
Registered User
 
sev7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Qatar
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minuous View Post
Wouldn't the better option, if you must use MacOS, be to run WinUAE via WINE?
Hi,
I would like to use only native Mac applications... without any Windows' porting.
sev7en is offline  
Old 23 February 2015, 17:54   #10
Minuous
Coder/webmaster/gamer
 
Minuous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canberra/Australia
Posts: 2,629
That's a strange attitude to take, as the Amiga programs you would be running are not "native Mac applications" anyway...
Minuous is offline  
Old 23 February 2015, 19:07   #11
Nekoniaow
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Montreal
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minuous View Post
Wouldn't the better option, if you must use MacOS, be to run WinUAE via WINE?
Wine is far from being complete enough to properly run WinUAE acceptably.
Also, it comes with all kind of subtle configuration issues which a proper adaptation like FS-UAE does not have since it's designed to be multiplatform.
Nekoniaow is offline  
Old 23 February 2015, 19:22   #12
fgh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 817
Use FS-UAE. It's the only recently developed emulator for Mac.
It uses the WinUAE emulation core, so it's just as precise.
fgh is offline  
Old 24 February 2015, 00:37   #13
sev7en
Registered User
 
sev7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Qatar
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by fgh View Post
Use FS-UAE. It's the only recently developed emulator for Mac.
It uses the WinUAE emulation core, so it's just as precise.
Good evening,
thanks, it is the one only updated I found but it looks less customizable than WinUAE as well with just a bunch of features.
sev7en is offline  
Old 24 February 2015, 00:41   #14
TCD
HOL/FTP busy bee
 
TCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by sev7en View Post
Good evening,
thanks, it is the one only updated I found but it looks less customizable than WinUAE as well with just a bunch of features.
The GUI for FS-UAE lacks a lot of the options that are available if you specify them in the config files. Have a look here about which options are available (there are still more that aren't documented): http://fs-uae.net/options
TCD is offline  
Old 24 February 2015, 05:25   #15
B14ck W01f
m68k all the way
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Koalaland
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by fgh View Post
Use FS-UAE. It's the only recently developed emulator for Mac.
It uses the WinUAE emulation core, so it's just as precise.
FS-UAE is great, if you just want to just emulate all the Amiga models without the millions of hardware add-ons for it. Problem is, it takes Frode forever to release a development version for it, and whenever he releases a new version, it's only bug fixes and no additions. The last feature he added was the Toccata sound card.

FS-UAE mainly relies on you having to mess around with config files if you want to emulate a particular piece of hardware/feature. All the options that FS-UAE supports are mentioned here. However, there are no descriptions for some of these (which you can see near the bottom of the page), and I already asked if if you want to emulate the FPU, whether you put fpu = 68030 or fpu = 68881. The point is that I don't think he updates it.

Sorry, I like WinUAE better. Toni has put a lot of effort into it so far.

Last edited by B14ck W01f; 24 February 2015 at 05:33.
B14ck W01f is offline  
Old 25 February 2015, 14:50   #16
sev7en
Registered User
 
sev7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Qatar
Posts: 15
Once again, thanks! I have a lot to read as I see but the best experience in the AMIGA world is with WinUAE...
sev7en is offline  
Old 25 February 2015, 15:19   #17
LeftyFPB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 16
There's an app called Hi-Toro. It was a front-end for E-UAE, which is apparently no longer being developed for Intel Macs. However, Hi-Toro still works, since it's an AppleScript app. It has a lot of configuration options that are missing from FS-UAE; you can use it to generate config files that work in FS-UAE.
LeftyFPB is offline  
Old 25 February 2015, 18:18   #18
sev7en
Registered User
 
sev7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Qatar
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftyFPB View Post
There's an app called Hi-Toro. It was a front-end for E-UAE, which is apparently no longer being developed for Intel Macs. However, Hi-Toro still works, since it's an AppleScript app. It has a lot of configuration options that are missing from FS-UAE; you can use it to generate config files that work in FS-UAE.
Thanks and another suggest: which one is the best platform to set as default? The Amiga 1200 or should I change it according to the app/games I want run?
sev7en is offline  
Old 25 February 2015, 22:54   #19
LuMan
Amigan - an' lovin' it!!
 
LuMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nottingham, UK
Age: 55
Posts: 557
Since getting a new Mac (with Yosemite) I've gone for FS-UAE as it's the only one I can get working properly! It takes a bit of setting up, but once you've added all your favourite configurations of Amiga into the Launcher it seems to work OK.

I've got the usual A500 for playing games, and a nice A1200 with a load of extras for emulating more serious stuff.

However, I did like the config files used by E-UAE and P-UAE. I had an almost perfect replica of my A1200T in P-UAE

Hope you get something up and running soon, Sev7en
LuMan is offline  
Old 26 February 2015, 14:11   #20
sev7en
Registered User
 
sev7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Qatar
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuMan View Post
Since getting a new Mac (with Yosemite) I've gone for FS-UAE as it's the only one I can get working properly! It takes a bit of setting up, but once you've added all your favourite configurations of Amiga into the Launcher it seems to work OK.

I've got the usual A500 for playing games, and a nice A1200 with a load of extras for emulating more serious stuff.

However, I did like the config files used by E-UAE and P-UAE. I had an almost perfect replica of my A1200T in P-UAE

Hope you get something up and running soon, Sev7en
Dear LuMan,
thanks.... did you know which one I will play as first? Operation Stealth
sev7en is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MacOS X 10.8 F12? dJOS support.FS-UAE 7 18 February 2013 11:04
FS-UAE MacOs issues fnap support.FS-UAE 2 02 October 2012 20:27
ClassicWB for MacOS Anakirob project.ClassicWB 7 15 October 2009 06:50
IPF on macOS X working ? Tony Landais project.SPS (was CAPS) 9 26 July 2008 20:04
MacOS 8.0 motorollin support.Apps 7 11 May 2006 23:56

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:22.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.18473 seconds with 15 queries