![]() |
![]() |
#81 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Denmark
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
So ran the youtube benchmark in WinUAE on i7 9750H 1m 47s (107 seconds) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Skien / Norway
Posts: 103
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#83 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Denmark
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
![]() New test yielded 46sec Quite impressive speed for the Pi 4B+ though. EDIT: Newer version of WinUAE gave a small speedboost, and now render the scene at 40sec Last edited by LaBodilsen; 27 February 2023 at 08:49. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 136
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#85 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Skien / Norway
Posts: 103
|
I just use Amiberry and overclock the Pi to 2.2GHz. Jit is on, ofc.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 136
|
Even emu68 on a pi4@2.2ghz is only ~%25 as fast as your result, but emu68 is significantly faster than the cpu emulation core in Amiberry, and Amiberry emulates an entire system as well, which eats into cpu resources, so I still dont understand how you're getting these results.
At about 700mips and 225mflops (which is what a pi4@2.2ghz gives on Amiberry according to sysinfo) a result of 95 seconds is impossible. |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Skien / Norway
Posts: 103
|
According to sysinfo I get 930Mips and 237 Mflops.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: May 2019
Location: Hungary
Posts: 6
|
Big Thax !
Try Later... |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Lahti / Finland
Age: 51
Posts: 376
|
i9-13900KS
|
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,369
|
![]()
Thanks to all that posted their times/ system info so far & keep em coming
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#91 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 62
|
Just for fun:
A1200/Vamp v2 Coffin56/Gold2.12fw - 1526s (25m 26s) Amiga4000D 3.2.1 WarpEngine060@96MHz - 1477s (24m 37s) Vampire V4SA+ Coffin57/SA_8435.jic (x14) - 1405s (23m 25s) Amiga4000T 3.2.1, BFG9060@100MHz - 1358s (22m 38s) A1200/PiStorm32 w/Pi4b+ @2.2GHz.CaffeinOS - 166secs X5000/20 2GHz MorphOS 3.18 - 119secs MACPRO5,1 2010 2x3.5GHz 6core. FSUAE/Coffin on BigSur - 80secs SGI FUEL 800MHz / IRIX 6.5.30f - 65s (62 without render preview turned on) SGI 4x1GHz (1 THREAD) - 53s (50s no preview) SGI 4x1GHZ (MAX THREADS) - 15s (14s no preview) RAYTRACING is really heavy on FPU load, also that scene has a lot of 'edges' for antialiasing, especially with the Adaptive Samples set to 8. (I usually use 16 or 32) Last edited by jkdsteve; 31 March 2023 at 00:59. |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,369
|
Amiga 1200, PiStorm32 with Raspberry Pi3a+ (March 10/23 firmware), Amiga OS3.2.2
5m59sec |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
Guru Meditating
![]() Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: England
Posts: 2,263
|
Interesting Fuel and Tezro results @jkdsteve, thanks for including
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vampire or PiStorm? | videofx | support.Hardware | 115 | 27 February 2023 16:38 |
PiStorm kills Vampire? | YouKnowWho | Amiga scene | 251 | 07 September 2022 11:07 |
Buying Vampire Accelerators on Vesalia | antiriad76 | Amiga scene | 2 | 13 February 2020 23:06 |
Accelerators - Is there any point in buying anything other than a Vampire in 2019? | ProfPlum | support.Hardware | 29 | 27 August 2019 10:54 |
Gold 2.7 release for the Vampire accelerators | guibrush | News | 110 | 06 June 2018 01:55 |
|
|