12 May 2002, 03:14 | #1 |
Posts: n/a
|
off topic:
@mods,RCK This "//admin:" message is becoming as annoying as a signature don't you think? How about PMing people if there's need for warning? |
12 May 2002, 12:54 | #2 |
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Paris / France
Age: 45
Posts: 3,091
|
I'm totally agree.
>> Signature will be deleted. >> PM with warning text will be sent. |
12 May 2002, 16:12 | #3 | |
Zone Friend
|
Quote:
How about stopping having a bee in the bonnet about small innocent signatures and just ignore them? But as the philosophers know, the most easy way to go is mostly the way nobody wants to go. Could happen to be too simple, couldn't it. |
|
12 May 2002, 18:32 | #4 | |
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
12 May 2002, 20:04 | #5 |
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Paris / France
Age: 45
Posts: 3,091
|
No, signature won't be allowed.
It is already a hard job to keep the board fast by cleaning / merging / splitting / classified old threads, I don't want to have to clean them each time I work on the EAB's database. Moreover, they are useless for our readers and doesn't improve the threads' reading. |
12 May 2002, 20:08 | #6 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 2,287
|
Would you really say your name after everything you said?? Or say "Amiga For-Eva"
No, hmm, I didn't think you would. |
13 May 2002, 03:01 | #7 |
Zone Friend
|
After my post is finished, YES SIR!
Of course I would. That's MY post, so I sign with MY name. And only MY name and no ads and no ... whatever. Just my name. I hate those ugly lines followed by signatures. That's some kind of formal business visiting card style. Eeeoowwgh. And for example, everyone who hates this line would never sign with those "on-off-switchable" signatures, but with direct ones. So would a lot of other guys. And again: one name is NO SPAM. My opinion, por favor. And nothing to rave about. Just my opinion. OMG, we dumb-founded people worry about signatures and there are things like: *) lots of threat in the Middle East *) psychotic schoolkids who kill dozens of innocent teachers *) recovery programs for Afghanistan with questionable success That's IM-POR-TANT. (tm) That's what even might influence OUR lives (think about impendent HUGE refugee streams if the situation gets worse than it is now!) So p-l-e-a-s-e, for Heaven's and Christ's sake, leave those bleeding signature things alone. I didn't want to say this, but it's really getting ridiculous now. -OVER- Last edited by andreas; 13 May 2002 at 03:17. |
13 May 2002, 04:09 | #8 | |
Give up the ghost
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: U$A
Age: 33
Posts: 4,662
|
Ah, this topic again. I see it's been split, too. Good job. Now it's time for my take on this. When this whole breakout over the sigs happened a couple of days ago, I was rather chuffed at the attack at moderators doing their job and how annoyed this made some people. I assure you it is more annoying dealing with newbies who simply won't read rules or read messages to get the feel of the place before jumping into the same tired territory as the last newbie. The bottom line: there are rules. You don't toss out rules because new users refuse to read them (nor read constant alerts in EVERY one of their messages!) It's not like doing maintenance is our recreation!
Quote:
Additionally, as soon as I see sigs under people's names here when reading messages, I know I am logged out somehow (because I have them turned off in my UserCP) so it serves another purpose, as well. |
|
13 May 2002, 05:59 | #9 |
Warhasneverbeensomuchfun
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rio de Janeiro / Brazil
Age: 41
Posts: 3,450
|
I agree with Twistin, there are rules, and they aren't there just for the sake of existing.
And it's true, after I begun to "hang out" around here, the other boards all seem really ugly and messed up. |
13 May 2002, 20:46 | #10 | |
Zone Friend
|
Agree at this point, but it's not the most important thing of the world. That's what it appears to me, after having followed various threads, rants and .. err ... discussions about it.
And if it happens once with a newbie, SO WHAT? :eek You drop him a PM and he knows where he's at. But you don't pollute his post by inserting this silly //admin: blah-yadda stuff. Being doomed to see it done at this extent as recently means for me that there seems nothing more important than signatures. Come on now. Quote:
Last edited by andreas; 13 May 2002 at 20:53. |
|
14 May 2002, 01:00 | #11 | |
Give up the ghost
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: U$A
Age: 33
Posts: 4,662
|
Quote:
|
|
14 May 2002, 02:25 | #12 |
Posts: n/a
|
Actually, there's a probably false assumption that eab users are bothered by signatures by a great deal. I really would like to know the percentage of eab users who are annoyed by signatures. It's just not -that- important, relax and take it easy guys.
|
14 May 2002, 04:43 | #13 |
Give up the ghost
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: U$A
Age: 33
Posts: 4,662
|
I think the more important fact is that it is RCK's board and his call.
And anyway, I thought this was already decided that PM's would be sent in place of the Admin insert bit, so why is this still being discussed? |
14 May 2002, 08:03 | #14 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 6,160
|
Also remember that this board is designed to allow people to read the Amiga postings as quickly and easily as possible.
If someone doesn't have a lot of time (and there are a lot of postings to read here), then they don't want to have to sift through a lot of junk after every single post - idiotic poetry, stupid quotes, elite speak etc. We don't have to read a lot of pop-up adverts on the EAB, so why should we have to read some personal statement after every post? |
14 May 2002, 08:16 | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Age: 51
Posts: 595
|
Cody, you forgot to sign your post with "Cody". I mean, I see your name and avatar to the left, but it COULD be that someone is using your ID. Shape up.
Edit: Sorry, I forgot to add my n[SNIP] |
14 May 2002, 14:03 | #16 |
Into the Wonderful
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Earthrealm
Age: 42
Posts: 1,429
|
Sigs make a forum/page look ugly, and makes it extremely difficult to distinguish between the actual message and the sig.
Avoid them like plague, please! Its like Internet junk mail. |
14 May 2002, 15:25 | #17 |
flaming faggot
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Versailles
Age: 55
Posts: 2,808
|
Signature disgust me. They are redundant, wasteful, silly, and I NEVER frequent forums polluted by them. I love the way RCK has made this a golden rule.
|
14 May 2002, 17:31 | #18 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cereal box
Posts: 794
|
Well, okay! Very interesting reading. Never knew passions ran so high.
I take it the objects of derision are both 'direct' and EAB UserCP-friendly signatures, then. I can see how the insertion of signatures everywhere might make a thread look untidy, and thus less easy to follow. Seems logical enough. Confused though: if they are such a bugbear, why are they available for members to use? When I registered, the first thing I did was customise my profile. A signature seemed to be promoted as a good thing to have, to go along with an avatar and title. Not wanting to contribute to cyber-pollution, I hereby retire my own signature. For those with sigs turned off in their UserCP, it went: "All-Time Guardian Champ". And it is true, too. |
14 May 2002, 18:09 | #19 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 6,160
|
They aren't a problem if we don't have to see them! If someone wants to add a signature in the EAB User Control Panel, then great. Then they don't bother me, because I've turned them off and everyone is happy.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Signatures | MethodGit | project.EAB | 39 | 30 April 2009 21:34 |
Ignoring signatures... | P-J | project.EAB | 3 | 12 January 2004 14:28 |
|
|