![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#301 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Antarctica
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
Everybody here always write about some QS configurations, but unfortunately, nobody says what compatibility mode is used and that's absolute basis. Because compatibility "Best" vs. "Low", it's like heaven and hell. I mean, for some testing should be always used "Best" compatibilty mode (But we can see it everywhere in EAB, where there is a talk about some Quick Start, so there is no info about compatibility). So again, in "QS A500 1.3 ECS 512+512" with best compatibility, the music really doesn't start playing. All other compatibility mode works correct (music is playing). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#302 |
Amiga 500 User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 1,323
|
@ross
Thank you for the explanation! (yes, that could be the reason) @Velociraptor5 Regarding Best vs Low compatibility slider you are right. I am not sure why this still exist... what is the point? (Btw. I always use Best compatibility mode) At least, choosing the quick start should place it to Best compatibility automatically (is that right?), but it not! (I do not know why) Last edited by amilo3438; 17 December 2022 at 21:24. |
![]() |
![]() |
#303 |
Defendit numerus
![]() Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Crossing the Rubicon
Age: 52
Posts: 3,959
|
@amilo3438
I bet that you have also DF1 ticked. The demo bug need a cycle exact CPU / disk DMA timing event, it is truly an unfortunate coincidence. About the compatibility slider.. there are those who prefer more speed in emulation and give up on a bit of compatibility. In fact it could also be included in the Quickstart preconfigured options, try asking Toni ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#304 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Antarctica
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
The closer to "low" the faster (everything, but more incompatibile). Also you are not able to use JIT with 020+ in "Best" compatibility mode... there is more reasons.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#305 | |
Amiga 500 User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 1,323
|
Quote:
Btw. before b5 the problem do not exist. Ps. BTW. I am on latest W10 version, everything updated! (next would be W11 but my current machine do not support it) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#306 | |
Defendit numerus
![]() Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Crossing the Rubicon
Age: 52
Posts: 3,959
|
Quote:
![]() It is therefore possible that in the next version the problem will not even appear again in any initial condition, given that very little is needed to change the situation. As you saw in a previous post Toni couldn't replicate it on his version, so I wouldn't bother with this demo. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#307 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: France
Posts: 456
|
I still don't understand why I still can't reproduce. I launch WinUae RC2, I select "Quickstart A500 1.3 ECS A500 512k + 512k", I load the demo in DF0 and I start the emulation. The music always starts before the title screen. I don't encounter the problem. I'm on Windows 8.1 and I don't think that changes anything compared to Windows 10. I give up for this demo.
![]() Last edited by Zarnal; 17 December 2022 at 22:06. Reason: Typo |
![]() |
![]() |
#308 |
Amiga 500 User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: EU
Posts: 1,323
|
@ross
For testing I always using only official versions! (unless otherwise requested) ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#309 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 48
Posts: 25,800
|
Probably because internal pseudo random number generator was changed. Every disk rotation length is randomized (few bits only) and now it probably creates condition that this demo fails to handle due to bad track loader.
This is not the first time this has happened. Works as designed but can be annoying. (There is always some demo that breaks this way) |
![]() |
![]() |
#310 | |
Bug hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 2,082
|
Quote:
![]() Started from config in signature (060 JIT), with F12 I've changed Chipset > Cycle Exact (DMA/memory). This is enough to run the game in a sort of slow-motion using WinUAE >4.9.1... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#311 | |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 48
Posts: 25,800
|
Quote:
If you enable on screen leds, does it show continuous >100% CPU usage? Does it still happen with today's winuae.7z (make sure datestamp is today). Any differences in CPU% value? You also have subpixel emulation enabled which can cause heavy extra CPU usage. Try without it. I can see higher CPU usage (which is expected) but nothing too heavy. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#312 |
Bug hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 2,082
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#313 |
Bug hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 2,082
|
Last edited by hexaae; 18 December 2022 at 01:42. |
![]() |
![]() |
#314 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Poland
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
![]() What Kickstart and SetPatch are you using? I tested several CPUs with FastRAM on 3.2.1 and can't reproduce. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#315 |
Bug hunter
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 2,082
|
Adding cpu_throttle -900 makes it usable: cpu usage 25-53% max and no music slowdowns...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#316 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 48
Posts: 25,800
|
I still can't duplicate this. But because 68030+ "cycle-exact" is also not recommended to be used (just like CPU speed adjustments): this is not going to be "fixed".
|
![]() |
![]() |
#317 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 48
Posts: 25,800
|
https://download.abime.net/winuae/fi...ae_41000b11.7z
https://download.abime.net/winuae/fi...64_41000b11.7z Beta 11 (RC3): This is going to be final unless something critical happens. - Fixed magic mouse without virtual mouse driver installed in RTG modes. (4.9.0) - Memwatch N flag was not cleared when watchpoint was reset. - Syncronize clock option was broken, when active, CIA-A TOD was stopped. Broken when CIA emulation was refactored (b1). - Small 68040+ "cycle-exact" adjustments. |
![]() |
![]() |
#318 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: France
Posts: 456
|
Will the future version 5.0 be just a bugfix of 4.9.10 (as mentioned in the first post) or will there be other major/minor improvements ?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#319 | |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 48
Posts: 25,800
|
Quote:
Any major improvements would mean: December 2023 release ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#320 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
WinUae 4.10.0 Beta 10 RC2 (64bit) works very well here with AmigaOs4.1 FE Update2 G-Rex Voodoo 3 configuration. I didn't change anything except updating the PPC Qemu plugin to a newer version. It has also become a bit faster. They are great. I love them :-D WinUae runs under MacOs with the help of Crossover (windows emulator) and yet it is very fast. Please give me a nativ MacOs arm port from WinUae :-D My Hardware: Mac Studio Apple M1 Max - 10 Core CPU / 24 Core GPU, 8C+2c/10T, 28MB Cache, Codename "Firestorm/Icestorm" (ARMv8-A64, 5nm) RAM 32GB LPDDR5-6400mhz Many thanks.... Last edited by Maijestro; 18 December 2022 at 21:07. |
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WinUAE 4.9.0 beta series (Was 4.5.0) | Toni Wilen | support.WinUAE | 1068 | 07 December 2021 18:45 |
WinUAE 4.1.0 beta series | Toni Wilen | support.WinUAE | 105 | 04 December 2018 21:36 |
WinUAE 4.0.0 beta series | Toni Wilen | support.WinUAE | 472 | 19 June 2018 23:54 |
WinUAE 1.6.1 beta series | Toni Wilen | support.WinUAE | 54 | 18 June 2009 12:05 |
WinUAE 1.5.0 beta series | Toni Wilen | support.WinUAE | 453 | 19 June 2008 10:05 |
|
|