25 March 2008, 12:42 | #1 |
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
KS Copyright
Hi,
I'm brushing up a bit on the whole copyright thing and investigating how the latest incarnation of Amiga would have had to protect the KS ROM copyright. Something really interesting has just turned up when checking the United States copyright office. I've gone through the whole thing and looked everywhere and can find no reference to the 3.0 or 3.1 ROM's as being copyrighted. LINK Last edited by Eclipse; 25 March 2008 at 12:43. Reason: Link |
25 March 2008, 13:24 | #2 |
Targ Explorer
|
HI do a search for Amiga Operating system,
Amiga OS and Software revision 3.1 is found.... |
25 March 2008, 13:41 | #3 |
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
Hi,
That's interesting. 3.1 is not called Amiga OS which is what they have registered it as. Also transfer of copyright has to have the express title of the work on all it's mediums. That would be Kickstart 3.1 No. XXXX (Like the old Commodore registered it like) and Workbench v XXXX. For a copyright to hold you have to express it as a medium. They've goofed up and registered Amiga OS3.1. If you look back at the copyrights transfered from Commodore you will see everything up to 2.05. They've made the 3.1 copyright themselves. I suspect it wasn't transfered and they did it anyway. Transfer has to be granted by writing by the original author. Now that leaves KS 3.0. I don't see that either. |
25 March 2008, 13:48 | #4 |
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
Just incase it turns out I'm right.
Amiga Inc. you can't register a copyright after the fact. Employer for hire? No they certainly weren't. Last edited by Eclipse; 25 March 2008 at 13:59. |
25 March 2008, 14:52 | #5 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
hmmm wouldn't a lot of KS3.0 code be protected by IP by the KS2.05 and prior ?
|
25 March 2008, 15:18 | #6 | |
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
Quote:
They could then refer to 2.05 as part of the copyright. It's like the same book with 2 different titles, you would copyright both. It's the title and work within that's copyrighted. Besides transfer of copyright has to be registered, I find no trace of 3.0 and 3.1 looks dubious. 3.1 actually does not include any other titles anyway. Have a look here. |
|
25 March 2008, 15:32 | #7 |
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
Sorry my bad for not explaining clearly.
CBM never released anything called OS3.0 or OS3.1.(Escom did). |
26 March 2008, 11:17 | #8 |
Music lord
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Liverpool, UK
Age: 50
Posts: 630
|
Don't know where you're reading your copyright law, Mr. Eclipse, but you're very wrong. Nothing needs to be registered for copyright to be enforced. All Kickstart versions are copyrighted from their moment of inception.
In the U.K: "Copyright is an automatic right and arises whenever an individual or company creates a work. To qualify, a work should be regarded as original, and exhibits a degree of labour, skill or judgement." Not only is registration unnecessary, but there is nowhere in the U.K to register with regardless. In the U.S: "While copyright in the United States automatically attaches upon the creation of an original work of authorship, registration with the Copyright Office puts a copyright holder in a better position if litigation arises over the copyright. " Registration is not necessary, and is purely for the paranoid to show proof of creation. |
26 March 2008, 13:05 | #9 |
Retro Gamer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Underworld
Age: 51
Posts: 4,072
|
So if original creator of KS didn't copyright kickstart, what proof can Amiga Inc. show that they created KS3.1 or own IP rights?
|
26 March 2008, 13:45 | #10 |
Music lord
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Liverpool, UK
Age: 50
Posts: 630
|
You never need to actively copyright something. You automatically own the copyright on creation. The proof part is what court cases are always about. It would be easy to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Commodore created it based on the history of the company versus the history of any challenger that might come about, and there should be documentation of transfer of rights through to Amiga Inc.
|
26 March 2008, 14:23 | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oooh what a feeling yeaaah dancing on the ceiling
Posts: 314
|
Try booting an Amiga and see what it says there...
|
26 March 2008, 17:32 | #12 | ||
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
Quote:
When Commodore went bust, Escom would have had to register as the new copyright holder. It's the only circumstance in which you do need to register it. From the US Copyright Office: Quote:
Do you guys not remember that Escom didn't actually want them? They only really wanted the Commodore name and the Patents that go with it. They wanted nothing really to do with the Amiga. Last edited by Eclipse; 26 March 2008 at 17:46. Reason: Extra text. |
||
26 March 2008, 18:33 | #13 |
Retro Gamer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Underworld
Age: 51
Posts: 4,072
|
And what's your point?
ps. Is anyone from Amiga Inc. reading this? That's of course if they've learned how to read. |
26 March 2008, 18:38 | #14 |
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
If the copyright wasn't transfered from Commodore in writing (or the chain was broken) then the current incarnation of Amiga don't own the copyright.
|
26 March 2008, 19:08 | #15 |
Retro Gamer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Underworld
Age: 51
Posts: 4,072
|
Except for most needed 1.3 and 2.04.
But still, it would be nice to be able to let people use 3.X |
26 March 2008, 19:50 | #16 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
truth is though... i can see it being taken to court...
People V's A(_._).STinc ".... so what evidence of the transference of copyright do mr McEwan ?...", said Judge Jones. Bill pulls smalll crumped up paper from pocket... "... see if you look carefully.. its says clearly here in crayola and in Fleecy's handwriting that the IP was signed for by CBM.... honest....." yeah..... its a moot point arguable.... i am not even sure that A.Inc even really OWN them.... i reckon they license them... but from whom?????...... |
27 March 2008, 06:18 | #17 | |
Turpentine
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 744
|
Quote:
Although.... I used to play city of heroes and was around when Marvel tried to sue them for copyright infringement. You would be amazed at some of the lengths companies go to to try and claim copyright. The marvel vs Cryptic case is widely reported on the net if you need to take a look. It transpired that Marvel created the offending copyrights in the game themselves!! More interestingly some of the so called copyrights they didn't have rights to at all, a lot had not been transferred correctly and some were even public domain. There is a very long thread on the COH website about it. |
|
27 March 2008, 16:50 | #18 | ||||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas/Nevada
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
(from the actual site on US copyright - www.copyright.gov) Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
27 March 2008, 17:09 | #19 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
@Siggy99
Hello there, Welcome to the EAB, theres plenty of mischief to get up to around here, so kick back and make yourself comfy and enjoy the honey coated retr0-ness that this fair board provides... although in retrospect, as much as i could wish that KS 3.x was free from AI's tyranny this is not so... but i can dream, and i can wish... and I would absolutely die laughing if they lost the bit of paper, (and were not clever enough to knock up a new one lol) |
27 March 2008, 17:11 | #20 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,448
|
Remember that KS3.1 is post Commodore.
It was published by VillageTronic |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amiga Games & Copyright | Contenance | Retrogaming General Discussion | 14 | 21 November 2011 12:01 |
SetPatch 44+ copyright string | amiga_user | support.Apps | 20 | 03 April 2011 01:55 |
Copyright holder field | NewDeli | project.GameBase Amiga | 8 | 19 August 2008 15:14 |
Workbench 1.3. What files are copyright? | redblade | request.Apps | 8 | 30 July 2008 10:16 |
|
|