English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Misc > MarketPlace

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 31 May 2011, 05:17   #1
c0dehunter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 399
Orig. Commodore A1200 vs. Escom A1200

Hello All,

Which one is better and why? Would you kindly discuses feautrue wise, build-quality, upgradeable, etc. I live in US, and I am interested in the NTSC version (if there is any difference, besides PAL system)

Thanks again.
c0dehunter is offline  
Old 31 May 2011, 09:27   #2
musashi5150
move.w #$4489,$dff07e
 
musashi5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolk, UK
Age: 43
Posts: 2,351
The Escom comes with 3.1 roms prefitted. It also comes with a modified PC floppy drive that doesn't produce a READY signal, so some trackloaders don't like it (this mod is reversible). And of course it doesn't have a C= badge

Other than that I'd say it's the same as a Commodore model.
musashi5150 is offline  
Old 31 May 2011, 12:26   #3
Djay
95th User
 
Djay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brighton/UK
Age: 48
Posts: 3,120
i bought an Escom A1200 and was unhappy with the drive issue... so i bought a A1200 with 3.0 roms and swapped everything around so i have the A1200 that is listed in my sig and i am really happy with it... i can always swap things back, but i havent felt the need yet!

I do however want to buy a white boxed 3.0 machine, with no extra ram and no hd.... i want it as a stock classic machine

mind you i also want a A4000D also... man i need some money
Djay is offline  
Old 01 June 2011, 08:42   #4
c0dehunter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 399
OK, thanks for your input, I really appreciate them all! Personally, I prefer the original C= model, since as you mentioned it can easily be "upgraded" to an Escom model, and it still retain its originality.

Thanks!

Last edited by c0dehunter; 01 June 2011 at 08:55.
c0dehunter is offline  
Old 01 June 2011, 12:34   #5
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by c0dehunter View Post
OK, thanks for your input, I really appreciate them all! Personally, I prefer the original C= model, since as you mentioned it can easily be "upgraded" to an Escom model, and it still retain its originality.

Thanks!
Interesting choice of words there.

Just installing 3.1 ROMs doesn't make it into an Escom A1200, but then again in order to make it into an Escom A1200, you need to modify the motherboard and swap in an incorrectly modified PC drive mechanism to fuck up the ready signal.. Which is hardly an upgrade if you ask me. :-)
Jope is offline  
Old 01 June 2011, 20:08   #6
Djay
95th User
 
Djay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brighton/UK
Age: 48
Posts: 3,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jope View Post
Interesting choice of words there.

Just installing 3.1 ROMs doesn't make it into an Escom A1200, but then again in order to make it into an Escom A1200, you need to modify the motherboard and swap in an incorrectly modified PC drive mechanism to fuck up the ready signal.. Which is hardly an upgrade if you ask me. :-)
hehe, indeed... exactly why i ... er ... downgraded
Djay is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A1200 Timing fix for my Escom Amiga? manic23 support.Hardware 46 19 August 2014 12:38
Escom A1200 long boot up time! PowerPie5000 support.Hardware 77 19 March 2010 16:17
AT/Escom A1200 Questions PowerPie5000 support.Hardware 50 01 March 2010 18:53
A1200 Escom/AT *Rev. Boards* ??? W4r3DeV1L support.Other 6 04 December 2008 13:43
escom A1200 thinlega Amiga scene 5 12 May 2002 01:16

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:20.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.07451 seconds with 13 queries