![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Greece
Posts: 237
|
Now have a look at this. It is a Microsoft book about the Amiga. Seeing is believing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Ancient One
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kansas City/USA
Age: 69
Posts: 685
|
Yep, that book has been around for a long time though. I bought a copy of it quite some time before Commodore went belly up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 46
Posts: 1,417
|
They also did a Macintosh Book - I have a copy of The Apple Macintosh Book 4th edn / Cary Lu 1992. Published by Microsoft Press.
But for the ultimate sacriledge check out this defective program which was bundled with Workbench: |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chester
Posts: 415
|
LOL! did they EVER write a decent basic? c64 basic was a complete dog.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Ancient One
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kansas City/USA
Age: 69
Posts: 685
|
Well, you have to remember that Microsoft began life as a dirty whore, supplying BASIC interpreters for a host of different machines that were competing for market share both before and for some time after the debut of the original IBM PC. Besides AmigaBasic and C64 BASIC, they also produced Microsoft BASIC for the Mac, Applesoft BASIC for the Apple II series, and undoubtedly did other versions of BASIC for other machines I've forgotten about long ago. They never had any particular loyalty to any one platform over another unless that platform gave them a broader market share than any other. When the IBM PC came out, they supplied not only the BASIC interpreter, but MS-DOS as well, which meant that they got more out of each PC sale than they did from sales of any other machine with an OS they didn't create. They're still dirty whores even after all these years, but incredibly wealthy ones.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Warhasneverbeensomuchfun
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rio de Janeiro / Brazil
Age: 41
Posts: 3,450
|
Just for the record
Microsoft also wrote MSX-Basic, which is arguably the best basic interpreter EVER around. They also wrote MSX-DOS. MSX-DOS 2 was written by Ascii and it was 200 times better ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: On Ami World
Posts: 500
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chester
Posts: 415
|
dirty whore OS 2003 - hehhe sounds good to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 46
Posts: 1,417
|
What about:
Visual Dirty Whore 2003 |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: On Ami World
Posts: 500
|
Open Slut 2003
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Eksjö / Sweden
Posts: 5,655
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chester
Posts: 415
|
What about oric (tangerine?) basic? It even had the ping command - now that's advanced!!!
(admitted, it went ping when you used that command, rather than any internet thingy) |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Mostly Harmless
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,149
|
Oh no, not a "my BASIC is better than yours"
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Pipboy approved
|
I bet I'm the only one here that likes (or admits that he likes) Microsoft and their products. NOT Visual XXX .NET thought... that sucks!
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amiga BASIC written by Microsoft?? | DDNI | Amiga scene | 77 | 27 June 2013 08:51 |
A new Amiga book? | andrew_rollings | Retrogaming General Discussion | 34 | 23 January 2011 13:05 |
Trade book "The Amiga Guru Book" for Amiga stuff | copper38 | Swapshop | 6 | 31 January 2009 14:17 |
Microsoft pays $6.1M for opensource Amiga program | alexh | Amiga scene | 2 | 20 June 2006 16:34 |
A new Amiga Book from Microsoft Press | Pyromania | Amiga scene | 8 | 18 May 2003 18:34 |
|
|