20 May 2022, 14:24 | #401 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,512
|
Ok I didn't want to start a new thread on custom roms I feel like I succeeded making the rom ok. So I just want to see if anyone else has had experience making a regular rom with the ehide.device in it?
My custom rom has ehide.device at the bottom of the build list but after I've been through the entire process of creating the image, splitting the image, creating and A file and a B file, concatenating, then byte swapping I still end up at the insert floppy screen and it appears the my CFHD isn't recognised on the TF1260 IDE. supaduper has successfully made some roms for me that worked with my classic WB3.1 system, but only 3.2 custom ehide roms seemed to work. So when I made my own custom 3.1 roms I expected them to work also but evidently not. Does anyone have any ideas where I might have gone wrong with this? Can't thank supaduper enough btw for all his help!! Wouldn't be this far if it weren't for him. |
20 May 2022, 16:54 | #402 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,512
|
I actually had forgotten to put the ehide.device in the rom
But now that I have re-done everything it still doesn't work. I get funky errors after every reboot, different every time. |
20 May 2022, 21:45 | #403 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,512
|
Well turns out most of the problem was solved by me moving the EXECUTE line I had at the top of my startup-sequence which created an Assign list. One I moved that lower down a few places my system booted fine with ehide.device in rom.
A new problem exists now however where I can no longer use pictures for background in workbench no matter how many times I select the picture and save it, after a reboot the background will have reverted back to blank and my saved option will have disappeared altogether from my patterns and the only way to get it back is to go and select it again. |
20 May 2022, 22:16 | #404 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Krypton
Posts: 1,210
|
Quote:
|
|
21 May 2022, 00:18 | #405 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
When using 3.2roms with ehide I have no such trouble. So weird. You are right though it is something to so with scalos because scalos controls the pattern/background in the CWB3.1 builds and not the WB version of pattern. To me it looks as though the intuition needs to load again or something once WB can be seen. But then that doesn't explain why the actually saved entry in scalos "pattern" has disappeared. Oh well it was definite progress for me so that's good. Fully capable of making a custom rom by myself now. Feels good |
|
21 May 2022, 14:55 | #406 | |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
|
|
21 May 2022, 20:58 | #407 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
I am always using PFS3-aio. |
|
21 May 2022, 21:02 | #408 |
Semi-Retired
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Leiden / The Netherlands
Posts: 1,993
|
Doesn't PFS3 have a keyboard interrupt handler that saves its caches just before reboot?
|
22 May 2022, 11:34 | #409 | |
-
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,861
|
Quote:
I haven't found this to be reliable even on those Amigas that support reset handlers. It does have it, this is true. |
|
22 May 2022, 12:34 | #410 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
So after waiting for that to happen, there is my background image. But then on reboot both soft and hard it will be gone again. Last edited by rabidgerry; 22 May 2022 at 19:13. |
|
28 June 2022, 01:48 | #411 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stasin/Poland
Posts: 46
|
Does anybody know if TF1260 should work with MC68040RC33V?
|
28 June 2022, 03:30 | #412 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Ireland
Posts: 672
|
|
28 June 2022, 08:58 | #413 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Karlstad / Sweden
Age: 52
Posts: 1,210
|
|
28 June 2022, 09:08 | #414 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stasin/Poland
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
040V has 3.3Voltage, it was used in Casablanca where you can put 060 or 040V Quote:
ok, thx for the info |
||
29 June 2022, 14:48 | #415 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stasin/Poland
Posts: 46
|
hmm, MC68040RC33V (as all 3.3V 040s) has only one clock pin: BLCK, but i assume that it still not compatible with tf1260, right?
|
14 August 2022, 15:54 | #416 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: willenhall
Posts: 86
|
give it a try... just dont blame the creator of the TF when your amiga explodes burning your house down and killing your dog in the process.
|
04 September 2022, 12:09 | #417 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
|
@rzookol, did you try it? ;-)
|
14 September 2022, 06:05 | #418 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 660
|
Quote:
The choice between a new PC with Pentium @ 150/S3 Trio 64UV/Yamaha Sonata 16 vs Phase 5 Cyberstorm 060 @50Mhz / Cybervision 64 (S3 Trio 64V) for my Amiga 3000 resulted in the Phase 5 upgrade solution wasn't price and performance competitive. Pentium 150 was overclocked to 166 Mhz with a simple 60 to 66 Mhz FSB jumper. PS; I overclocked TF1260's 68060 rev 1 to 62.5 Mhz. |
|
14 September 2022, 22:09 | #419 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,946
|
Quote:
Also, something to remember about Quake comment above. Lots of PC owners with Cyrix CPUs struggled to run Quake (and probably AMD K5), so even PC users suffered ;-) |
|
15 September 2022, 00:14 | #420 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,518
|
I played Quake on a Pentium 60 in 1996 and friends of mine played it on 486 in that year. None of us had any dedicated graphics cards. A year later on a Pentium 200 Quake II would be something else until that machine got a Voodoo 2 card and then Quake II would again be something else. I'm not doing a great job at selling how much tech advanced between 1994 and 1997, am I?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|