![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
Shopping for cheap Fast RAM tomorrow
Before I go to the "computer fair" tomorrow and hit up all the second-hand sellers, I just wanted clarification on something.
For an A1200 is the following correct? PCMCIA cards can be used, but must be 4mb or under and must specify themselves as being SRAM? Also, will this work to give me the 4mb I need to install & use OS3.9? Double also, will this memory be available without booting Workbench (say for bootable game disks, etc)? Sorry about all the questions, but I searched and couldn't find a definitive answer, almost, but not quite ![]() PZ. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lesser Talent
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 7,957
|
I think OS3.9 requires 6MB of Fast RAM. It was OS3.5 that needed 4MB
Even if you had the 6MB, OS3.9 would still run very, very badly. It's bad enough on my 68030 with 32MB of Fast RAM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
Quote:
![]() If only 3.5 was out of copywrite, I could dowload it...but of course it isn't ![]() PZ. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
![]() I was thinking of trying 3.9, is it really that bad KG? Using an '030 A1200 with 64Mb RAM and OS3.1 now. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lesser Talent
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 7,957
|
Well from my experiences I found it extremely sluggish and really not worth the extra eye-candy. But that's just me. You may be happy with it, but I'd recommend against buying an accelerator just for OS3.9.
Give 3.9 a try in WinUAE, see what you think of it, but remember to try it with a realistic setup, not a P96 screenmode, uber gfx card beast. Your A1200 ain't gonna reproduce that now is it ![]() I'm just not a fan of OS3.5/OS3.9. I'm a classic Amiga user and am more than happy to use ClassicWB over 3.5/3.9 any day. It's more responsive, comes packed full of tools and it's free. Oh and it runs on a classic Amiga ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
Thanks for the replies guys, it has been very helpful & stopped me from going on a fruitless install mission, but 3.9 aside, I'd still like to clarify as to wether the following observations are correct or not:
Quote:
Is it an actual OS, or just a skin? My main concerns were loosing memory if it was a skin and loosing functionality if it was a true OS. Any downsides? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Lesser Talent
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 7,957
|
Nah it's not a skin. It's a workbench replacement of sorts.
I use ClassicWB FULL and it's very resource friendly. It'll leave you with most of your precious chipram free and use your Fast RAM instead. I'd recommend at least trying it out, see if you like it. I'd also recommend installing a replacement filesystem on your Amiga too. Smart File System (SFS) really does speed up your Amiga. http://classicwb.abime.net/classicweb/introduction.htm That page should explain anything you need to know but I can answer any specific questions if you need me to ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Longplayer
|
i never tried os35/39 on aga, but via 040/rtg, its pretty slick
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
Cool, I'm downloading both the Lite & Full versions right now...connection speed is very low now...lol
![]() Thanks for clearing that up KG ![]() Anyone gunna' tell me about the PCMCIA SRAM stuff now? ![]() PZ. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
Matt, you've convinced me, 3.9 sounds like a PITA, so I'll go with what you said (aside from actually using it, I'll sell it)
![]() *edit* - Out having a smoke I just realised that reasons for getting 3.9 were the net access, newer audio & video players, etc. Classic WB won't give me those...and here I am having just purchased 3.1 ROMs & other stuff I couldn't really afford in order to install 3.9 after Amigakit's site NOT telling me I need well over 32mb of RAM...stuff from the UK costs an arm & a leg too...oh f*cking joy!!!! ![]() Last edited by Fingerlickin_B; 04 May 2007 at 17:48. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Ya' like it Retr0?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 49
Posts: 9,768
|
Heys fingers,
okies... you can only use SRAM memory cards in the PCMCIA port as you know.. the limmitations are 4MB or under! (any more either wont work or will only string up *upto* 4MB) I would recomend using the pcmcia on the a1200 rather than attempting to get hold of (somewhat overly expensive sram pcmcia memory) instead i would use the pcmcia for either a wirless network card or in conjuntion with a compact flash card and adapter!. save your redies m8y, and plumb for an accelerator card... |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
CON: artist
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Poland
Age: 43
Posts: 1,250
![]() |
3.9 has nothing you can't live without or can't replace with software that runs just as well on a 3.1 setup. There were some major changes (especially with the IDE drivers and FFS filesystem) and a TCP/IP stack thrown in but why not use Miami or AmiTCP? People bought these upgrades in hope that a PPC OS would follow as good sales were to convince Amiga inc. that developing such a version would be financially feasible.
As for the memory expansion it'a a good idea but investing in a accelerator would definitely give you a better Amiga experience. I remember my switch from an 8 meg expansion to an Apollo40/40. Me and my twin brother almost hit the roof when Workbench booted up in under 10 seconds ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
Thinks for a bit.... or maybe that's just the thing that get's copied when you select 3.8 update over 3.5? probably! Sorry, can't help with the Sram questions, I've just (2 Hours ago) won one off ePay, and I'm hoping it'll work! Last edited by amigarobbo; 04 May 2007 at 23:01. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Zone Friend
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dundee / Scotland
Posts: 151
|
wb 3.5 is on the cd, youll have to show all files/folders as it dont have an icon. No installer tho
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
Ok, so the general consensus seems to be that I should get an accelerator instead.
I don't really plan on using the PCMCIA slot for anything else anyway, but that's cool. Yep, no luck getting PCMCIA SRAM anyway ![]() Well here's the bit, I don't really want an accelerator, nor can I afford one...they are just far to expensive. I really just want a simple memory expansion now, but does such a thing exist? I've searched eBay & Googled heaps, but just keep finding accelerator upon accelerator ![]() PZ. *edit* Have taken up the advice regarding 3.9 and won't be using it now either. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Lesser Talent
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 7,957
|
You can grab RAM cards which fit in the trapdoor slot of your A1200. They are usually quite cheap and can take up to 8MB of RAM I think.
(if you don't plan on using the pcmcia slot as well) They shouldn't be too expensive nowdays. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
Thats the kind of thing I'm looking for KG, but can't find one anywhere
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Lesser Talent
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 7,957
|
ah yeah, just noticed you are in Aus...
I've no idea where to find them then. There is a '1202 DKB expansion board' on this site but that's all I dug up ![]() http://mc1.boing.net/mc1amiga/usedpart.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
That's cheaper than anything I've seen so far thanks man
![]() Oh, and thanks for searching, I didn't expect you to do that ![]() ![]() PZ. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Amiga Nut
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Belco, Australia
Posts: 2,242
|
I've found a 32mb DRAM PCMCIA card.
Would it work? (of course only providing the permissible 4mb) |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
32-bit Fast RAM slower than 24-bit Fast on certain A1200 config | moshy | support.WinUAE | 1 | 24 May 2013 21:55 |
Why no one makes a cheap A1200 RAM Card? | Nostromo | Amiga scene | 14 | 08 April 2013 21:09 |
Use of 4MB PCMCIA Fast Flash Memory as Fast RAM in A1200 | nkarytia | support.Hardware | 10 | 16 September 2011 13:37 |
[SAS/C] Making malloc() allocate in fast RAM instead of chip RAM? | 8bitbubsy | Coders. General | 3 | 07 August 2011 07:06 |
32-bit FAST RAM vs. ZII FAST RAM | polbit | support.Hardware | 16 | 28 January 2007 20:16 |
|
|