![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: *
Posts: 567
|
Image off by 3 pixels when using filters
![]() The screenshot on the left was taken with filtering off. The screenshot on the right was taken with filtering on. It happens regardless of the chosen filter or Graphics API. What's even weirder is the way "Vert. position" slider works; it takes -4 to shift the image 1 line upwards (e.g. -3 won't have any apparent effect whatsoever) so in order to properly re-position the image, it has to be set to -12. I'm using the latest beta for the test as filtering in previous builds didn't really work for me, but I'm aware that this is not a beta-exclusive issue. Last edited by Maren; 03 March 2010 at 20:15. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
WinUAE developer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hämeenlinna/Finland
Age: 49
Posts: 26,573
|
It is by design. Internally difference is very big between no filtering and any filter. (You can see even more difference if window is much bigger than visible area)
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: *
Posts: 567
|
Alright, thanks for the answer. Guess I'll have to test this further to get a better idea of what's going on with the pixel shifting thingy
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Poland in pixels | s2325 | Nostalgia & memories | 3 | 05 May 2014 22:38 |
Measuring speed with pixels | Lonewolf10 | Coders. General | 19 | 18 November 2011 09:31 |
Pushing Pesky Pixels | Zetr0 | support.Hardware | 0 | 21 October 2010 23:49 |
To complement Patrick Jean's PIXELS | khu | Nostalgia & memories | 1 | 11 April 2010 19:51 |
PIXELS by PATRICK JEAN | s2325 | Nostalgia & memories | 12 | 10 April 2010 20:39 |
|
|