19 September 2014, 22:34 | #121 |
Ruler of the Universe
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lanzarote/Spain
Posts: 6,195
|
|
05 December 2014, 07:20 | #122 | |
Supernormal
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Istanbul / Turkey
Age: 43
Posts: 1,416
|
Quote:
I use the Queues scheduler. |
|
08 June 2015, 20:41 | #123 |
Returning fan!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 1,438
|
Hi all!
Sorry to bump this thread Is exec.library v45.25 available somewhere? I could not find it through Google? Thanks! |
08 June 2015, 22:38 | #124 | |
Global Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
Quote:
|
|
22 July 2015, 14:24 | #125 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Hartlepool / England
Posts: 389
|
That one is quite old now,
It's a real shame we can't download the new one from Cosmos' site anymore |
23 July 2015, 13:56 | #126 |
Zone Friend
Join Date: May 2006
Location: France
Posts: 1,855
|
Since Exec library source code leaked, I don't understand why Cosmos do not work from it.
I don't think it's less illegal than updating CBM sources. As for the rest of the OS it's mainly C and AFAIK Cosmos is more proficient in ASM so having the original 3.1 won't help much I suppose except maybe for the comments. They should release the 3.1 source code as opensource for 68k purpose only IMHO. Kamelito |
23 July 2015, 15:15 | #127 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Hartlepool / England
Posts: 389
|
It states in the Readme of his latest exec.library
that he is still looking for the original sources of Kickstart 3.1 I had no idea they had been leaked, so maybe he hasn't either... |
21 January 2016, 21:20 | #128 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ?
Posts: 19,658
|
WHY was Cosmos banned? and where can we get this library?
|
21 January 2016, 22:03 | #129 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 749
|
Why he was banned i have no idea. But as far as i know he pulled all the working links due to people profiting of his work, claiming it their own, where as he wanted it spread "free of cost" and to be credited.
I'm not sure if he's still active anywhere, and if not, your only shot is getting someone else who managed to get the latest stuff, to share it with you. I wish i downloaded and stored it, but thats a bit late... prowler linked above. It's not "the latest stuff" but i suppose some is better then none... Best of luck. |
21 January 2016, 22:12 | #130 |
BoingBagged
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 46
Posts: 2,358
|
For what it is worth, we exchanged some emails about Amiga related stuff like three weeks ago. He was supposed to reply back, but still no news.
|
21 January 2016, 22:25 | #131 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 170
|
He's on Amiga.org all the time.
|
25 February 2018, 21:49 | #132 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: #DrainTheSwamp
Posts: 4,545
|
new patch released: workbench.library 45.138
not exec, but made by Cosmos. so I guess it's the right place to post it. |
26 February 2018, 16:38 | #133 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 170
|
I hadn't heard about this. Thanks for bringing it to everyone's attention. Have you tried it out yet?
|
26 February 2018, 17:00 | #134 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: #DrainTheSwamp
Posts: 4,545
|
Quote:
together with PeterK's icon.library. never saw any problems. updated to 45.138 some days ago, still no problems. one things is strange, the workbench version requester does not show the correct version, but cli command does. I'm no workbench expert, maybe this is just a side effect. #1) almost on top of startup-sequence: Code:
Version >NIL: workbench.library 45 If WARN LoadResident >NIL: LIBS:icon.library LoadResident >NIL: LIBS:workbench.library REBOOT EndIf Last edited by emufan; 26 February 2018 at 17:48. |
|
26 February 2018, 18:56 | #135 |
Coder/webmaster/gamer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canberra/Australia
Posts: 2,681
|
@emufan:
The version displayed for Workbench in that requester is derived from version.library, not workbench.library. |
26 February 2018, 19:15 | #136 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 170
|
Would you explain a little more what you are saying Minous? The workbench requester is reading from the actual library and gives one answer while the CLI is reading through the version.library something different from the library?
|
26 February 2018, 19:21 | #137 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: #DrainTheSwamp
Posts: 4,545
|
thanks for that info. so I can ignore it, as I did in the past
the 40.42 does match the $VER string from libs:version.library while the $VER of workbench.library in 3.1 ROM is 40.5 this is indeed a bit strange. |
26 February 2018, 21:20 | #138 |
Coder/webmaster/gamer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canberra/Australia
Posts: 2,681
|
@dannyp1:
It's the other way around: The Workbench requester is getting its "Workbench" information from version.library (will be 45.5 for an OS3.9+BB4 system) - the term "Workbench" here is being used in a broader sense than just workbench.library. Whereas using the Version CLI command on workbench.library will give the version of workbench.library. Last edited by Minuous; 26 February 2018 at 22:26. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aladdin 4D Beta testers | Pyromania | Amiga scene | 0 | 22 December 2007 19:22 |
PSPUAE needs beta Testers! | Hungry Horace | News | 0 | 01 February 2007 22:38 |
Wanted: Beta Testers | BippyM | project.Amiga Demo DVD | 51 | 12 April 2005 06:01 |
exec.library problem with VisualPrefs | oldpx | support.Apps | 4 | 29 August 2002 00:18 |
|
|