17 May 2023, 10:15 | #101 |
This cat is no more
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: FRANCE
Age: 52
Posts: 8,360
|
All Bitmap Bros games were first coded on the ST, then ported to the Amiga.
On Gods they added copper skies, but overall it's a 16 color game (I can't imagine what it could have looked like with 32 or 256 colors!). Also 32 colors were really slower, so it was another reason to choose 16 colors. |
17 May 2023, 10:23 | #102 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,921
|
|
17 May 2023, 10:25 | #103 |
This cat is no more
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: FRANCE
Age: 52
Posts: 8,360
|
Ouch! I should know as I read the excellent book about the Bitmaps. They still used 16 colors for speed (and also because the ST version would have looked so washed up or they'd have to rework the palette completely).
But at least there's an AGA version (that some people hate, but I find it a good effort) |
17 May 2023, 21:23 | #104 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Eastbourne
Posts: 1,073
|
All other things equal, 16 colours would be faster than 32 on the Amiga, but Xenon 2, Gods and Magic Pockets aren't exactly fast are they? I know Gods is designed to be methodical and puzzle-oriented, but the other two arguably suffer for it.
|
17 May 2023, 22:40 | #105 |
J.M.D - Bedroom Musician
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: los angeles,ca
Posts: 3,590
|
About Xenon 2 i remember sometime ago mcGeezer did a dissection of it
|
17 May 2023, 23:01 | #106 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
That probably explains why I have a much more positive view of Xenon II than a lot of other people apparently do... ;-) |
|
18 May 2023, 08:24 | #107 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,921
|
Hehe, I used to think that too There is a difference between a game that is intended to be slower and one that just runs poorly though. Not sure which one is the case for Xenon 2
|
18 May 2023, 22:53 | #108 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,710
|
Quote:
In the typical fashion of Amiga fans, games get trashed for 'only' running at 25 fps. But many of us find it hard to tell whether a typical game is running at 25 or 50 fps, which proves that it's usually not that big a deal. However there are games that run 'poorly', like Sim City 2000 for example. The mouse pointer freezes while rendering the terrain. That's just bad coding, a fault that should have been corrected or the game canned for not meeting a reasonable standard. |
|
18 May 2023, 22:58 | #109 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Eastbourne
Posts: 1,073
|
I massively prefer the earlier Hybris to Xenon II, and it baffles me that most reviewers preferred Xenon II (the Bitmap Brothers' brash rockstar image contrasting with the anonymous US-based Scandinavians behind Hybris, and perhaps the apparent ST bias in the UK media at the time), however while I assume Hybris is 50fps and Xenon II is 25fps tops, I'm not sure that reversing that would change my opinion. If Xenon II was designed to be methodical, they did a poor job of marketing it that way, and never expressed any regret over that. It's not just the speed that puts me off Xenon II, I prefer Plutos too, and that has slowdown. Blood Money has much better design for a methodical slightly strategic shooter (and plays slightly better on the ST due to being a bit slower and thus less fearsomely hard, ironically).
Sim City 2000 was just poorly coded, apparently the Mac version runs faster through a Mac emulator than the Amiga version does natively. They probably just figured that people had nothing to compare it to that required such a high spec. |
19 May 2023, 11:50 | #110 |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,921
|
|
19 May 2023, 21:47 | #111 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Eastbourne
Posts: 1,073
|
The A3000 did well within its intended niche, a 7Mhz processor was impressive for 1987 but looking a bit sluggish for serious work compared to PCs by the early 90s. Maybe the A1500 should have had a faster processor, to make it a bit more of a worthwhile model compared to the previous A2000.
|
21 May 2023, 12:26 | #112 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,710
|
Quote:
For those who already had an A2000 when the A3000 came out, it was cheaper to add an accelerator card. The Video Toaster didn't fit in the A3000 either, another niche it couldn't fill. Quote:
But the real attraction of the A2000 was what you could put in it. Start with the base model, then add an accelarator card of your choice, a hard drive and controller, RAM, I/O ports, RTG etc. or even make your own cards for it. It was a system that grew with your budget and needs. The A3000 had a lot more in it to start with, but also came with a much higher price tag that put it well outside the budget of the average Amiga fan. Furthermore expansion was limited by the cramped space inside it - you couldn't even add a 5.25" floppy or CDROM drive internally. I bought an A3000 because I thought it would be a good replacement for my A1000, but looking back I probably should have bought an A2000 like my friends did - instead of choosing form over function. |
||
21 May 2023, 14:24 | #113 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,924
|
I guess the important aspect in upgrading the CPU from a 68000 was that this implied exchanging the 16bit architecture and bus width by a 32bit architecture. 32bit boards and subsystems were rather expensive in 1987-89. A 16 MHz 68000 wouldn't cut it either with 020 and 030 accelerarors available. It would have meant more money wasted for those who wanted to upgrade the CPU and thus had no use for the 68000. I think the A3000 in 1990 was the right point in time for a 32 bit machine but it should have made better use of the doubled bandwidth by having AGA. Also, the wedge computer to accompany the A3000 should have made the same step up.
|
22 May 2023, 21:34 | #114 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Eastbourne
Posts: 1,073
|
Quote:
|
|
23 May 2023, 00:08 | #115 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,710
|
Quote:
In those days most business people weren't buying their computers from Woolworths. There were specialist computer stores which installed stuff for you and provided ongoing support (that's how they made most of their money). I was doing this in New Zealand in the 90's. At this time the big department stores started selling name-brand PCs such as Compaq, Acer and HP like they were TVs. But they had no technical staff and their after-sales support was abysmal. I picked up a lot of business from that oversight. |
|
23 May 2023, 00:31 | #116 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,710
|
Actually it didn't. I only had my A3000 a short time when I realized it didn't have enough RAM and the hard drive was too small. I managed to squeeze an extra drive in there in there but it was tight, and getting the SCSI bus stable was tricky. Installing those ZIP chips was a Pain!
Later on I installed an 060 card, and that was even more painful. The card barely fitted under the drive shelf, and didn't have enough room to install even the lowest profile fan. I ended up cutting a hole in the drive shelf, which took ages because it was thick steel. Every now and then the machine would get flaky and I would have take it all apart to reseat the accelerator card. Quote:
|
|
23 May 2023, 09:07 | #117 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,924
|
Quote:
Also, you could have removed the drive that already was in the A3000 rather than adding a second one. SCSI-drives were so cheap in 1998 that it didn't matter. |
|
23 May 2023, 10:03 | #118 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,377
|
There was also the A2500 released by Commodore, which was an A2000 with an accelerator already fitted. So a faster A2000 version was already available, though a model with a faster CPU is always going to be more expensive than a 68000-based one.
|
23 May 2023, 14:47 | #119 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,710
|
Quote:
Quote:
In 1990 the A3000 cost US$3999 for the base unit with 25MHz 030, 40MB hard drive and 2MB RAM (1MB Chip + 1MB Fast). A GVP 28MHz 030/68882 board with 4MB of 32 bit FastRAM and 40MB hard drive for the A2000 sold for $2399. A 16MHz 030 board with 4MB RAM only cost $999. The A2000 base unit cost less than $1500. If you already had one it was much cheaper to upgrade it than buy an A3000, but even the combo of A2000 + 28MHz 030/68882/4MB and 40MB hard drive was cheaper. In 1992 the A4000 with 25MHz 040, 6MB RAM (2MB Chip + 4MB Fast) and 120MB hard drive cost $3699. That's 3-4 x more computing power, 3 x more RAM and 3 x more hard drive space, and of course AGA graphics - all for $300 less than the A3000. By 1993 the street price had dropped to $2299 - and Amiga fans complained that it was too expensive! |
||
23 May 2023, 15:13 | #120 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,924
|
Come on, Bruce, I was pulling your leg by replying to your comment in a way that I think seemed similar to what you often write. That being said, you do add a lot of perspective to these discussions which I appreciate. It's reassuring to see that you do find some faults in what Commodore did.
My Amiga friend (who "infected" me with the Amiga virus) was very happy to upgrade from his A500 to a used A2000 with a 25 MHz 030 and SCSI controller when AGA was already around. So yes, A2000s were good value a few years after they were introduced. In 1987 they seemed to offer too little in the base package (my opinion) when compared to the A500 but, as I stated above, there were good reasons why it was still too early for a full 32bit architecture which pretty much ruled out any processor above the plain 68000 it came with. This makes me wonder why there wasn't a 68020 with a 16bit data bus. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What speakers do you use for your Commodore computers? | hansel75 | Retrogaming General Discussion | 54 | 31 December 2019 21:13 |
did commodore have its own website in early 90s? | honx | Amiga scene | 6 | 02 December 2017 21:25 |
Santa's come early... A new scandoubler from Individual Computers | NovaCoder | News | 708 | 18 October 2016 22:43 |
Sinclair Zx Spectrum: absolutely better than Commodore 64 | CU_AMiGA | Retrogaming General Discussion | 61 | 31 March 2009 09:03 |
La Puerta de Sinclair / Sinclair's Gate | Shoonay | Retrogaming General Discussion | 0 | 09 November 2007 16:09 |
|
|