English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Main > Amiga scene

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 24 June 2019, 23:46   #761
indigolemon
Bit Copying Bard
 
indigolemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Kelty, Fife, Scotland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by hth313 View Post
But now I suspect the same as you... which is very sad, as normal software companies release updates to their customers when they are available, without teasing them by holding it back and rubbing it in.
I would assume that the 1st July for the update, assuming indeed that is what this is, is the date they've set for release - you know, like every other software company does when releasing updates.
indigolemon is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 06:24   #762
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by hth313 View Post
But now I suspect the same as you... which is very sad, as normal software companies release updates to their customers when they are available, without teasing them by holding it back and rubbing it in.
I'm sorry, nobody is holding anything back. Preparing an update means a little bit more than just pushing an lha out to the public. It also means that FAQs and READMEs and a whitepaper have to be produced, that a final round of checking has to be made. This takes a couple of days, even if the software is final. It also means that we give everyone some time for the final round of testing. I was also on a business trip the last days, so could not prepare everything that needs to be prepared. From the side of the developers, pretty much everything will be done hopefully by tonight. Then, there are still a few days left to move data on the server, and ... just in case ... a critical bug appears, we still may have a chance to fix it.

So, I really wonder why you believe that there are any bad intentions here - not at all. Everybody is working hard to get things out.
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 06:30   #763
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by hth313 View Post
If we are lucky it is a countdown for the current court case which hopefully will kill Hyperion for good.
And then what? It could essentially mean that all rights for contributions that were collected over time would have to be re-negotiated with their corresponding authors. Many of them are no longer active, and might be hard to contact. Thus, if you believe that this would end a long legal struggle, you might find AmigaOs in an even worse position afterwards. It might mean that a set of components of 3.1.4 would have to be rewritten (yet again) to avoid infringing third party rights, and this might be another horror story.

So, as much as I can understand that Hyperion did not do much for the classic systems all the years, it is not a solution to the problem either. Nothing will automatically go "open source" or "transfer seamlessly" to Cloanto.
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 07:32   #764
hth313
Registered User
 
hth313's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Delta, Canada
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Richter View Post
So, I really wonder why you believe that there are any bad intentions here - not at all. Everybody is working hard to get things out.
Thanks for clarifying.

The reason is that in my experience, it is impossible to know the date unless you are truly done beforehand and are just waiting with there release. Maybe some people are better than I am at this, my apologizes in this case.
hth313 is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 07:32   #765
quantum8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: BNE AU
Posts: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by hth313 View Post
But now I suspect the same as you... which is very sad, as normal software companies release updates to their customers when they are available, without teasing them by holding it back and rubbing it in.

I don't see the problem with them announcing that they're working on an update, and then working on fixing the bugs they've found....


Ask them if they have any external beta testers if you really want a pre-release update that badly.
quantum8 is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 07:40   #766
hth313
Registered User
 
hth313's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Delta, Canada
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Richter View Post
And then what? It could essentially mean that all rights for contributions that were collected over time would have to be re-negotiated with their corresponding authors. Many of them are no longer active, and might be hard to contact. Thus, if you believe that this would end a long legal struggle, you might find AmigaOs in an even worse position afterwards. It might mean that a set of components of 3.1.4 would have to be rewritten (yet again) to avoid infringing third party rights, and this might be another horror story.

So, as much as I can understand that Hyperion did not do much for the classic systems all the years, it is not a solution to the problem either. Nothing will automatically go "open source" or "transfer seamlessly" to Cloanto.
Yes, we have different opinions here, I know.

In my point of view, the problem we have is exactly due to the above, that ownership is fragmented as everyone want to keep their parts secret rather than really open things up and collaborate instead, which preferably should have been done a long time ago.
hth313 is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 08:20   #767
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by hth313 View Post
Yes, we have different opinions here, I know.

In my point of view, the problem we have is exactly due to the above, that ownership is fragmented as everyone want to keep their parts secret rather than really open things up and collaborate instead, which preferably should have been done a long time ago.
And, because of that, you want to fragment it more? Look, the problem is that multiple parties already contributed to AmigaOs, at various stages, with individually negotiated license terms. This did not start with 3.9, but even back in CBM times. It is like opening Pandora's box. For example, the narrator.device was never owned by CBM, they only had a binary license for it. Who knows which type of licenses CBM had for ARexx (did not come from CBM) or the Kickstart 2.0 dos.library and shell (did neither come from CBM, but the Software distillery, essentially arp), or CrossDos, or...

Even if Cloanto would want to open it (whatever "it" then is), they hardly could - they would first need to hunt down the individual agreements, if even possible after such a long time. They do not own as much as they might believe, even with Hyperion out of the way.

The whole construction of AmigaOs is from a legal perspective very fragile. There is no "black or white". There are only multiple parties with partially overlapping and partially conflicting interests, and the story would hardly end with Hyperion out of the way. It would rather open another Pandora's box of software licensing, and just another round of struggle.
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 18:09   #768
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
..6..
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 18:16   #769
shaf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Toronto / Canada
Posts: 238
ARexx was from William S Hawes, I know because i have a non CBM copy when it was a commercial product before WB 2.0.
shaf is offline  
Old 25 June 2019, 18:19   #770
AMIGASYSTEM
Registered User
 
AMIGASYSTEM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,262
I hope it's a surprise for "everyone" and freely distributed, for sure the whole world Amiga would be happy.
AMIGASYSTEM is offline  
Old 26 June 2019, 12:49   #771
Daedalus
Registered User
 
Daedalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaf View Post
ARexx was from William S Hawes, I know because i have a non CBM copy when it was a commercial product before WB 2.0.
Yeah, that's the easy bit - running RexxMast under later OS versions where it was included even announces as much. The problem is more about what sort of licence it is, and is it open for renegotiation. Presumably it covers binary inclusion with Amiga OS from 2.0 onwards, which might cover Amiga OS releases by other companies under the Amiga brand, but we don't know for sure. My understanding is that Hawes was treated poorly by Commodore back in the day when it was included with OS 2, and thereafter refused to have anything further to do with Amiga. That's why ARexx has been essentially unchanged since then, up to and including OS4.
Daedalus is offline  
Old 26 June 2019, 13:14   #772
gulliver
BoingBagged
 
gulliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 46
Posts: 2,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daedalus View Post
Yeah, that's the easy bit - running RexxMast under later OS versions where it was included even announces as much. The problem is more about what sort of licence it is, and is it open for renegotiation. Presumably it covers binary inclusion with Amiga OS from 2.0 onwards, which might cover Amiga OS releases by other companies under the Amiga brand, but we don't know for sure. My understanding is that Hawes was treated poorly by Commodore back in the day when it was included with OS 2, and thereafter refused to have anything further to do with Amiga. That's why ARexx has been essentially unchanged since then, up to and including OS4.
Yes, that is more or less what happened.

There are many other third party contributions like for example:

The commodities.library and subsystem.
The Agfa compugraphics fonts.
The amigaguide system.
The default system icons.
The boot images of many machine roms.
All the work that went into the dark period of 1994-1999 (from CBM bankruptcy to just before AmigaOS 3.5)

And the list goes on and on.
gulliver is offline  
Old 26 June 2019, 19:47   #773
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
..5..
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 26 June 2019, 23:38   #774
Ian
Global Moderator
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 2,299
Back on topic now boys and girls.
Ian is offline  
Old 27 June 2019, 03:43   #775
grelbfarlk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,970
For a fantasy feature of 3.1.5 I'm wondering what the feasibility of ROMnifying some subset of P96 so it could be loaded (and intialize the RTG card), so Early Startup and Boot without Startup Sequence could go through an RTG card. I realize this is a tall order but I wonder whether it's all possible or feasible or if anyone had an idea how it could be done.
grelbfarlk is offline  
Old 27 June 2019, 07:41   #776
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by grelbfarlk View Post
For a fantasy feature of 3.1.5 I'm wondering what the feasibility of ROMnifying some subset of P96 so it could be loaded (and intialize the RTG card), so Early Startup and Boot without Startup Sequence could go through an RTG card. I realize this is a tall order but I wonder whether it's all possible or feasible or if anyone had an idea how it could be done.
Around zero. First, P96 is owned by someone else, and second, it would require the drivers of many cards on board, and third, none of them including the rtg.library are ROM-able, and forth, there is not enough space in ROM anyhow, and fifth, this is the wrong direction - components should be removed from ROM rather than integrated into the ROM.
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 27 June 2019, 18:54   #777
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
..4..
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 28 June 2019, 01:51   #778
grelbfarlk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,970
I didn't mean necessarily "be put in the kickstart" but say a system where a user could loadmodule individual components like rtg.library, their #?.card driver, picasso96settings, and if necessary their bus driver like pci.library.

The part where you would come in, in the imaginary universe where these libraries were romable/loadmoduleable, Early Startup Screen and lets say dos.library (probably more) were patched/rebuilt to come up on boot after restart on the RTG display.

Or maybe an achievable goal would be an after-boot version of Early Startup Screen that could be run in Workbench to select boot device, no startup-sequence and so on.

I don't know how OS4 does it, but on Classic I thought it was possible to get to the OS4 early startup screen on the Voodoo.

*Mods sorry this should have gone in the AmigaOS 3.1.4 successor wishlist.*
grelbfarlk is offline  
Old 28 June 2019, 10:25   #779
Daedalus
Registered User
 
Daedalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by grelbfarlk View Post
I don't know how OS4 does it, but on Classic I thought it was possible to get to the OS4 early startup screen on the Voodoo.
OS4 loads all the extra parts you're thinking of as "Kickstart Modules", so in essence they're a Kickstart that's loaded from disk. That's how things like RTG and USB are available for the early startup, and how they can easily be enabled, disabled and updated without swapping chips. I guess such an approach could be done under OS3 too, but it would make for much longer boot times and soak up a lot of RAM.

An alternative option might be to use one of the flash module that stores extra modules that are loaded as part of AutoConfig. There are a couple of Zorro cards that do this for big-box Amigas, but nothing that I'm aware of for the smaller models.
Daedalus is offline  
Old 28 June 2019, 10:53   #780
ExiE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: T/C
Posts: 199
..3..
ExiE is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would AmigaOS 3.9 be ok for me? stu232 support.Hardware 12 02 October 2013 18:20
AmigaOS 3.9 PoLoMoTo support.WinUAE 8 27 August 2011 18:06
AmigaOS 3.5 or 3.9 maddoc666 support.Apps 12 22 February 2010 08:02
AmigaOS koncool request.Apps 6 04 June 2003 17:45
AmigaOS XL sturme New to Emulation or Amiga scene 4 15 January 2002 02:13

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:14.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.12219 seconds with 14 queries