![]() |
![]() |
#761 |
Bit Copying Bard
![]() Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Kelty, Fife, Scotland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,293
|
I would assume that the 1st July for the update, assuming indeed that is what this is, is the date they've set for release - you know, like every other software company does when releasing updates.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#762 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
|
Quote:
So, I really wonder why you believe that there are any bad intentions here - not at all. Everybody is working hard to get things out. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#763 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
|
Quote:
So, as much as I can understand that Hyperion did not do much for the classic systems all the years, it is not a solution to the problem either. Nothing will automatically go "open source" or "transfer seamlessly" to Cloanto. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#764 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Delta, Canada
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
The reason is that in my experience, it is impossible to know the date unless you are truly done beforehand and are just waiting with there release. Maybe some people are better than I am at this, my apologizes in this case. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#765 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: BNE AU
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
I don't see the problem with them announcing that they're working on an update, and then working on fixing the bugs they've found.... Ask them if they have any external beta testers if you really want a pre-release update that badly. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#766 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Delta, Canada
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
In my point of view, the problem we have is exactly due to the above, that ownership is fragmented as everyone want to keep their parts secret rather than really open things up and collaborate instead, which preferably should have been done a long time ago. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#767 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
|
Quote:
Even if Cloanto would want to open it (whatever "it" then is), they hardly could - they would first need to hunt down the individual agreements, if even possible after such a long time. They do not own as much as they might believe, even with Hyperion out of the way. The whole construction of AmigaOs is from a legal perspective very fragile. There is no "black or white". There are only multiple parties with partially overlapping and partially conflicting interests, and the story would hardly end with Hyperion out of the way. It would rather open another Pandora's box of software licensing, and just another round of struggle. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#768 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
|
..6..
|
![]() |
![]() |
#769 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Toronto / Canada
Posts: 238
|
ARexx was from William S Hawes, I know because i have a non CBM copy when it was a commercial product before WB 2.0.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#770 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Brindisi (Italy)
Age: 70
Posts: 8,262
|
I hope it's a surprise for "everyone" and freely distributed, for sure the whole world Amiga would be happy.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#771 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,380
|
Yeah, that's the easy bit - running RexxMast under later OS versions where it was included even announces as much. The problem is more about what sort of licence it is, and is it open for renegotiation. Presumably it covers binary inclusion with Amiga OS from 2.0 onwards, which might cover Amiga OS releases by other companies under the Amiga brand, but we don't know for sure. My understanding is that Hawes was treated poorly by Commodore back in the day when it was included with OS 2, and thereafter refused to have anything further to do with Amiga. That's why ARexx has been essentially unchanged since then, up to and including OS4.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#772 | |
BoingBagged
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South of nowhere
Age: 46
Posts: 2,358
|
Quote:
There are many other third party contributions like for example: The commodities.library and subsystem. The Agfa compugraphics fonts. The amigaguide system. The default system icons. The boot images of many machine roms. All the work that went into the dark period of 1994-1999 (from CBM bankruptcy to just before AmigaOS 3.5) And the list goes on and on. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#773 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
|
..5..
|
![]() |
![]() |
#774 |
Global Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Derby, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 2,299
|
Back on topic now boys and girls.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#775 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,970
|
For a fantasy feature of 3.1.5 I'm wondering what the feasibility of ROMnifying some subset of P96 so it could be loaded (and intialize the RTG card), so Early Startup and Boot without Startup Sequence could go through an RTG card. I realize this is a tall order but I wonder whether it's all possible or feasible or if anyone had an idea how it could be done.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#776 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#777 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,313
|
..4..
|
![]() |
![]() |
#778 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,970
|
I didn't mean necessarily "be put in the kickstart" but say a system where a user could loadmodule individual components like rtg.library, their #?.card driver, picasso96settings, and if necessary their bus driver like pci.library.
The part where you would come in, in the imaginary universe where these libraries were romable/loadmoduleable, Early Startup Screen and lets say dos.library (probably more) were patched/rebuilt to come up on boot after restart on the RTG display. Or maybe an achievable goal would be an after-boot version of Early Startup Screen that could be run in Workbench to select boot device, no startup-sequence and so on. I don't know how OS4 does it, but on Classic I thought it was possible to get to the OS4 early startup screen on the Voodoo. *Mods sorry this should have gone in the AmigaOS 3.1.4 successor wishlist.* |
![]() |
![]() |
#779 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,380
|
Quote:
An alternative option might be to use one of the flash module that stores extra modules that are loaded as part of AutoConfig. There are a couple of Zorro cards that do this for big-box Amigas, but nothing that I'm aware of for the smaller models. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#780 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: T/C
Posts: 199
|
..3..
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Would AmigaOS 3.9 be ok for me? | stu232 | support.Hardware | 12 | 02 October 2013 18:20 |
AmigaOS 3.9 | PoLoMoTo | support.WinUAE | 8 | 27 August 2011 18:06 |
AmigaOS 3.5 or 3.9 | maddoc666 | support.Apps | 12 | 22 February 2010 08:02 |
AmigaOS | koncool | request.Apps | 6 | 04 June 2003 17:45 |
AmigaOS XL | sturme | New to Emulation or Amiga scene | 4 | 15 January 2002 02:13 |
|
|