21 October 2023, 20:33 | #41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Roma
Posts: 343
|
Yeah, I think the Falcon could've been mostly saved by a true 32-bit bus and a better blitter...but then it wouldn't really be that cheap, would it?
|
22 October 2023, 02:45 | #42 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
|
|
22 October 2023, 06:58 | #43 | |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
Quote:
They did all they could so that it could not happen (ahaha with a mac emulator, photoshop could be used on Amiga 1200/4000, what a joke !) |
|
22 October 2023, 09:01 | #44 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: No(R)Way
Age: 42
Posts: 3,222
|
Here in Norway i never saw a Atari for sale or use even.. All through the 90`s ... Amiga 500 / 600 / 1200 and big boxes was in several stores..
|
22 October 2023, 09:21 | #45 | ||
Zone Friend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Age: 40
Posts: 2,127
|
Quote:
Quote:
Was it possible to use the DSP as a modem? If so what would be the maximum speed because modems were very expensive during that era and if the DSP could have been used as a 9.6K modem that could have been a good sales pitch. |
||
22 October 2023, 14:53 | #46 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,186
|
Quote:
The Falcon was also intended to be used with MultiTOS AKA MiNT (Nowadays available as: https://github.com/freemint/freemint) And that can optionally use a MMU. In addition, i am not entirely sure how this works in the Falcon but i suspect you would need the MMU to set cache inhibit on memory pages accessed by write-backs from the DSP or other DMA-able peripherals such as the SCSI controller. |
|
22 October 2023, 14:55 | #47 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,186
|
Quote:
I know some early Linux developers who got TT030's at close-out prices in the early 90s and used those as development machines. Cheap at the time secondary machine with proper SCSI etc that could be used as a second-platform for verifying endian-ness portability etc. |
|
22 October 2023, 15:34 | #48 |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 9,016
|
Only a small part of the reason
Nope, Atari were mainly the reason why the Falcon failed.
By the time the Falcon was released, the majority of software publishers and developers had already stopped writing software for the Atari ST/e computers, and to compound the misery, those same developers would have known about the Falcon before they stopped writing for the ST, so even its imminent arrival wasn't about to contribute in any meaningful way. The price for the base Falcon was also another problem, sure the base Falcon was more powerful than a base A1200, the base Falcon was significantly more expensive than an A1200, and getting awfully close to a PC for price. The A1200 was also released at the height of the Amiga 500's success, and pretty much EVERY publisher were onboard with supporting the A1200 from the start, the Falcon had Cubase make some press releases and Imagitec said they were working on some demos. The A1200 certainly had some effect on the Falcon, I was one of those considering buying a Falcon when it was announced, but was put off immediately by the price point and that there wasn't going to be any killer software for it that made it an essential purchase. But the main reason was Atari, at that price point, software publishers likely wrote it off instantly suggesting not many would be sold, there were far more Archimedes computers in existence and they didn't write software for that either, so that gives you an idea of just how successful devs and publishers thought it was going to be. I think it was only placecs like France where the ST was a better seller than the Amiga that got any traction as the French devs and publishers thought that the Falcon would be the natural upgrade progression for those ST owners, hence the likes of Silmarils and other French publishers supporting Falcon initially. |
23 October 2023, 00:40 | #49 |
Zone Friend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Age: 40
Posts: 2,127
|
|
23 October 2023, 11:15 | #50 |
Alien Bleed
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 4,394
|
For a machine I never had, I feel an obdurate pang of nostalgia for the Falcon. I'd definitely have one, if I had any room and the wife would permit it
|
23 October 2023, 11:27 | #51 | |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,916
|
Quote:
|
|
23 October 2023, 12:29 | #52 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,974
|
Was A1200 to blame for Falcon's failure?
Quote:
I don’t use the expression DOA a lot, but for the Falcon, it fits like a glove ;-) It never stood a chance. However it is only with the benefit of hindsight that it becomes so obvious. I remember seeing one in some shop in Sweden (dont recall exactly when but probably spring 1993. I remember I wanted one badly just after reading the specs, but it was too pricey for me then. In August 1993 I got the A1200 instead, and I was not satisfied with it. i think my brief encounter with the Falcon made the A1200 look bad. It wasnt untill I added a small harddrive and a Blizzard 1220 that I fell in love with my A1200 and forgot about the Falcon. (although by then it was obvious the Falcon had flopped big time). |
|
23 October 2023, 13:04 | #53 | |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,916
|
Quote:
Atari did know which niche might still buy the machine though (Recording Musician, Nov 1992): |
|
23 October 2023, 13:12 | #54 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Eastbourne
Posts: 1,073
|
I wanted the Falcon to do well and continue the Commodore v Atari rivalry for another (half) generation, but there was just too much wrong with it. Aside from brief media coverage it sank without trace in the UK too.
Considering how much better Workbench was than TOS (even overlooking that horrid shade of green, everything was more usable and intuitive on the Amiga, even before WB2), using an OS even remotely derived from TOS was a mistake. Had Atari had the funding to spend an extra 6-12 months on rewriting the OS, giving it a proper case, erasing the bugs and glitches, and teaching programmers how to use it properly, given it more than 1Mb memory out of the box, and perhaps added fuller ST/STe compatibility, the results might have been different. Launching the Falcon at £100 (or, with those issues fixed, maybe even £200) more at a slightly later date would not have mattered if the overall package was better than the A1200, as the A500 was compared to the ST. |
23 October 2023, 16:04 | #55 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Marseille / France
Posts: 1,508
|
A part from Silmaris games (Ishar serie, Transarctica and Robinson Requiem), I don't even remember any commercial game being released for the Falcon.
They even released Ishar 3 and RR in CD format. How many of them could have been sold ? |
23 October 2023, 16:13 | #56 | |
HOL/FTP busy bee
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 31,916
|
Quote:
|
|
23 October 2023, 16:26 | #57 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Marseille / France
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
Thanks ! Didn't knew that Pinball Dreams had its Falcon version... The rest is mainly PD games or ST version that runs better on Falcon. At the end, about 10 games released commercialy in physical format... Even game commissioned by Atari It is hard to pretend that the A1200 was a failure when you compare both games libraries. |
|
23 October 2023, 17:29 | #58 |
Registered Abuser
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Valencia / Spain
Posts: 363
|
Falcon was built for already small base of Atari users and really did not have any chance of luring in PC or Amiga users. Few people not happy with what Commodore did with A1200 made petitions in the community to jump to Falcon camp, but I can only assume this number was really insignificant.
It was a losing battle to start with – even if Falcon had offered substantially more power for cheaper than A1200. Perhaps if Atari had architecture not available to others, coupled with deep enough pockets to pay top developers for a wide library of games and apps exclusive to the platform, market the thing widely, and then keep that up with 100% commitment they might have had a chance or luring people in. Tl;dr Building something, dumping it to few stores and publishing an ad in Atari ST magazine was not enough. |
23 October 2023, 17:46 | #59 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: >
Posts: 2,940
|
Quote:
Reads for grim reading, just 3 commercial games after a year on the market, and even grimmer for those who opted for the 1MB model, i suspect most models got upgraded at extra expense just to be able to use most of the software written for it. |
|
23 October 2023, 18:24 | #60 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Willich/Germany
Posts: 233
|
Answer to the question is clearly: no.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GBS-C causes A1200 boot failure? | teh | support.Hardware | 7 | 21 February 2024 16:09 |
Was the Atari ST to blame for badly ported games? | sparhawk | Nostalgia & memories | 165 | 19 October 2023 13:45 |
Atari ST isn't to blame, multiplatform development is. | donnie | Retrogaming General Discussion | 110 | 04 October 2023 06:23 |
A1200 Floppy Failure. | Failed Again | support.Hardware | 4 | 09 September 2014 18:45 |
For Sale: A1200 Falcon 1240@40Mhz + 128MB RAM | Zetr0 | MarketPlace | 2 | 22 June 2012 17:00 |
|
|