How to execute an intro with ASM ONE

[StingRay]

Originally Posted by musashi5150

I like it because it's nice and simple

I always found it rather awkward to use with all the pull down menus and stuff. But that's just a matter of personal preferences I guess.

Also I bought a REAL copy of it back in the day with MONEY... so I have to get good value from it

Now that's indeed a VERY good reason.

[heavy]

...oops, edit bug?

[heavy]

Originally Posted by dannypet

the source code
of an old intro from Agile that is DL 40 http://cyberpingui.free.fr/rsources.htm

hmm DL 40 it's the download counter of the sources : it's not a fix value
which source is it from Agile ? 1, 5 or 6 ? (or link .php?id=xxx)

these sources are AsmOne/DevPac compatible : uncomment "ASMONE" at the top of the source

if you have any problems with them, contact me


(PS: I like both AsmPro 1.17/AsmOne 1.48 and DevPac 2 or 3)

[W4r3DeV1L]

Originally Posted by heavy

hmm DL 40 it's the download counter of the sources : it's not a fix value
which source is it from Agile ? 1, 5 or 6 ? (or link .php?id=xxx)

sources are AsmOne/DevPac compatible : uncomment "ASMONE" at the top of the source

if you have any problems with them, contact me


(PS: I like both AsmPro 1.17/AsmOne 1.48 and DevPac 2 or 3)

Hi the file is called agile5.zip

I don't know why, but I am trying to assemble intros that I have on Scene Storm Volume 1 but no one finish the compiling because or files are mìssing or occur errors.

[heavy]

like agile and others sources, change path of incbin/include or incdir with your path.
ex: for agile, at the top, change the "incdir dh0:agile5/"

what kind of occur errors and files ?
(I haven't scene storm)

[W4r3DeV1L]

Originally Posted by heavy

like agile and others sources, change path of incbin/include or incdir with your path.
ex: for agile, at the top, change the "incdir dh0:agile5/"

what kind of occur errors and files ?
(I haven't scene storm)

I will post 2 intros in the zone and u will tell me if they works is it ok?

[heavy]

source SinScroll is not complete ! includes bitmap, headers (include/hwequates.inc) and module replayer, etc... missing
for plasma source, files pmc.sine1, sine1024bs.dat and sine1024bs.dat are missing. perhaps in a common data directory somewhere on the cd ?
else there is the final executable : it's possible to grab sinetabs directly...

[W4r3DeV1L]

Originally Posted by heavy

source SinScroll is not complete ! includes bitmap, headers (include/hwequates.inc) and module replayer, etc... missing
for plasma source, files pmc.sine1, sine1024bs.dat and sine1024bs.dat are missing. perhaps in a common data directory somewhere on the cd ?
else there is the final executable : it's possible to grab sinetabs directly...

@Heavy

into the file :SineScroll_1.rar there is a folder bitmap and a folder include,check the file I have sent to u.

For plasma actually I don't know. But I am winraring all the demo section of the cd I have and will upload on and will post u the link because are more of 30 MB and the zone is till 6 MB.

Thanks

Daniele

[Toni Wilen]

Originally Posted by StingRay

V1.48 most probably only works on 3.xx machines. That's why I told you to try the 1.20 version as that one definitely works on 2.0 machines.

1.20 works even on KS 1.3 (using it on my real A500 tests..)

Enlighten me, why do you UK guys like Devpac so much? IMHO it has a rather slow editor and isn't that nice to use. I'd really like to know why almost all UK coder's used Devpac while the rest of the world used ASM-One (or derivatives).

I also thought "everyone" used asm-one or clones

[heavy]

yep, I know there are 2 folders in archive, but I talk about the source : code is missing !
source is cutted at the end. Even the routine "logoshaker" in VBI and buffers !
you can skip player, and logoshaker, but you have to rewrite the rest.

[Hungry Horace]

devpac for the text editing,(well it's nicer than using Ed!) , but BarFly for compiling is a winner

ASM-one fills the source code file with a bunch of header junk . yuk!

[StingRay]

Originally Posted by Hungry Horace

ASM-one fills the source code file with a bunch of header junk . yuk!

What you call header junk are in fact markers for the the source so you can jump to marked parts easily. And you do know that you can turn it off in the options, don't you?

[StingRay]

Originally Posted by Toni Wilen

1.20 works even on KS 1.3 (using it on my real A500 tests..)

That brings back memories of using Asm1 and later Trash'm-One on my 1.3 A500 back in the day.

I also thought "everyone" used asm-one or clones

Except for the English. I want to see any Devpac user beating ASM-One's turnaround times. a/j for the win!

[Hungry Horace]

Originally Posted by StingRay

And you do know that you can turn it off in the options, don't you?

no, but not suprising considering i didnt spend long with the program, as BarFly is (imo) the better compiler!

(as a complete asm 'nobrainer' exercise, with no previous experience at all, i was able to make whd sources compile with asm where they would not with asm-one - there is little that is 'technical' in my reasoning!)

[NOB]

Originally Posted by StingRay

Enlighten me, why do you UK guys like Devpac so much? IMHO it has a rather slow editor and isn't that nice to use. I'd really like to know why almost all UK coder's used Devpac while the rest of the world used ASM-One (or derivatives).

Imho the devpac advantage was that it came with include files and
libraries.Hisofts Devpac could handle the include derective. (1988 or 89)

The Sekas weren´t able to include files (back in those days).
Even in patched versions it was nessesary to define external files and
load them with "Y" command.

And AsmOne was not available until 1990 or 91.

[StingRay]

Originally Posted by NOB

Imho the devpac advantage was that it came with include files and
libraries.Hisofts Devpac could handle the include derective. (1988 or 89)

The Sekas weren´t able to include files (back in those days).
Even in patched versions it was nessesary to define external files and
load them with "Y" command.

And AsmOne was not available until 1990 or 91.

No doubt that back in Seka days Devpac was better (who doesn't remember all the "seka vs. devpac" articles in the various diskmags ;D) even though there were some pretty nice patched/rewritten Seka versions like Buddha's or Corsairs MasterSeka which I both liked and used a lot. But even after ASM-One (or later Trash'm-One which introduced the "switch between different sources with F-key" feature, one of the most useful features ever IMHO) was released the UK coders still preferred Devpac which I never really understood. ;D Then again, to each his own I guess.

[BippyM]

Originally Posted by StingRay

No wonder I've yet to find a UK coder who preferred ASM-One over Devpac.

Err me

Well I use barfly too lol and I don't do much coding in anything haha