09 May 2024, 16:33 | #4121 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: France
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
@babsimov I don't agree we you about reusing the A500 case. It was important from a marketing point of view to have a fresh design and the A1200 case is a nice achievement. I was very happy to have it, more svelte but in the same line of it predecessor. It showed the innovation of the machine. I was bored of the A500 case. The VIC20/C64 was from another area when customers were less observant. And for me, the case of the Falcon was a complete deception for sure. It gave me the sensation of a machine blocked in the past, some DIY, something not very appealing. The problem for C= was not the A1200 case cost, it was to not be able to produce enough machines for Christmas. |
|
09 May 2024, 17:09 | #4122 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 2,076
|
I like it a lot, and would say it did look a tad better than A500, though that doesn't mean I don't like the A500's (or A1200s) looks (they certainly don't look "uncool", as some of the folks in that Guardian thread claim).
|
09 May 2024, 17:11 | #4123 |
Computer Nerd
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rotterdam/Netherlands
Age: 48
Posts: 3,856
|
|
09 May 2024, 17:19 | #4124 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 2,076
|
|
09 May 2024, 17:38 | #4125 |
Computer Nerd
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rotterdam/Netherlands
Age: 48
Posts: 3,856
|
|
09 May 2024, 18:01 | #4126 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Poland
Posts: 868
|
Quote:
The only real problem with different orientation of HDD would've been if there was different kind of bearings but that would basically force usage of such drive in only one specific valid position. Any other problems which comes from hard drive being mounted at different angle most likely come from bad vibration transfer (maybe even near mechanical resonance) and/or incorrect tightening and are not inherently relevant to mounting position. Mounting HDD in angle between 0 and 90 degrees has absolutely no effect on air cushion which holds head over platter in specific distance. And bad head positioning is the only thing which might induce bad sectors... |
|
09 May 2024, 18:19 | #4127 | |||||
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: France
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Totally agree, the look of the ST case was very modern for the time and particularly original. The 500's case is much more conventional. But while I much preferred the ST case, it was what was inside the 500 case that really clinched my choice at the time. Quote:
As I said, of course a new case was a preferable option, as was planned with the 1000+. But in the interest of saving money, it wouldn't have bothered me that much if the 500's case was reused, say in another color, as long as inside there would have been the AGA, a 3.5" 40 MB hard drive and why not a DSP. And if it had also made it possible to have this at the end of 1990 I would have been even happier. The 500 case could have been modified to have a second side expansion hatch to install connectors from an internal expansion card. It could have been for example a DSP card, if the DSP was not included as standard. A modification like the one we can see here. https://www.a1200.net/amiga-500-cases-original-gallery/ To choose, an A500 case modified like that would have suited me perfectly at the time as long as it had the AGA in it and a harddrive (of course, on top of the keyboard, it would have been necessary to add a third LED for HD activity, like on the A1200) About the 1200 case, at the time I made up my mind, especially because it contained the AGA and finally brought something new to the Amiga. But, for all that, the legacy of the 600 bothered me, in particular the uninteresting 16-bit PCMCIA port and the more expensive 2.5" hard drive for the same capacity, just because this case was the legacy of the worst Amiga model, the 600. If Commodore absolutely wanted a keyboard case, well I would have preferred the 500 or something with a similar size. Quote:
Quote:
On the other hand, what was inside the Falcon and, in particular, its DSP really made me dream. More than the AGA. I waited until the end for the Amiga DSP card promised by Commodore. After the bankruptcy, that's when I bought an accelerator card. Now knowing the situation of Commodore at the time of the release of the AGA generation, well if the reuse of the 500 case could have saved Commodore some money, it seemed to me an option not to be rejected. Quote:
And I also agree, the 1200 case was not perfect, but at least we found a real keyboard with numeric keypad like the Amiga had always had, with the exception of the 600, and also a data port. Internal extension that can once again accommodate interesting extensions. But, of course, the 1000+ case would have been the best option by far. Last edited by babsimov; 09 May 2024 at 18:44. |
|||||
09 May 2024, 18:46 | #4128 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Figueira da Foz
Posts: 429
|
It wouldn't have saved and you would be left with a new generation machine on old case...
|
09 May 2024, 18:56 | #4129 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: France
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
But, for me, to choose between the 1200 case or the 500 case (a little redesigned as indicated above) well I prefer the 500 case, because it is more spacious and expandable. Some people have Amiga 1700s, a 1200 motherboard in a 500 case and it's not bad. https://www.amibay.com/threads/my-am...e-shape.33225/ And, of course, the ideal would have been the 1000+ case. |
|
09 May 2024, 19:39 | #4130 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Figueira da Foz
Posts: 429
|
I hear all people talk about 3.5"... my A1200 had one 3.5", so I don't really know what they're about. Perhaps only some 3.5" fit, my surely did, I don't know
|
09 May 2024, 20:35 | #4131 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: France
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
But by default the 1200 is internally designed for a 2.5" hard drive only. Putting a 3.5" inch is DIY. Whereas with a larger case in the style of the 500, it would have fit without problem from the beginning. |
|
10 May 2024, 00:09 | #4132 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: France
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
In my opinion Ali was using the Amiga platform to push new PC technologies coming to the market: PCMCIA an 2.5". In a sense it was not totally stupid as it will be technologies really used in a near future in laptops but the Amiga deal with teething problems. For the record, when I ordered my A1200 with an HD (I was absolutely bored with having only floppies on the A500), I had to wait something like 2 or 3 weeks because there was not 2.5" cable available. I mean it show there was a real problem of industrialisation/organisation at Commodore at A1200 time. Such problems delay cash to arrive when it could be avoided. Quote:
|
||
10 May 2024, 01:28 | #4133 | ||||||
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: France
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Quote:
Medhi Ali only instruction regarding the 300/600 was that it must not be expandable, because he wanted to sink GVP!!! Besides, originally the 300 was not supposed to have a hard drive controller, but as already without the hard drive it cost more to produce than the 500, they added the hard drive controller to pass the pill. And as the case was too small, the 2.5" was the only size that fit. Jeff Franck made the first big mistake with PCMCIA which was a standard for laptops, and therefore already expensive. The 2.5" hard drive is the other error that comes as icing on the cake. The 600 accumulated all the possible and imaginable errors to make a monumental flop. And he did it. Faced with complaints from the community about the small keyboard, they also made up the argument that it was a step towards to a future Amiga laptops one day. What a hell of a joke. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Moreover, the 1000+, the entry-level model originally planned for the AGA generation, had a hard drive as standard and it was obviously the wisest choice. Quote:
Besides, it's paradoxical, because I remember that in the press at the time the Falcon was really praised for its technical innovations and in particular its DSP. While the 1200 was well received, but not as praised for its innovation (particularly in terms of sound). The Falcon especially paid for the fact that Atari disappointed its community with the STE which didn't have much more than the ST. There are also publishers who fled this platform more than the Amiga. And then, it must also be said, like the 1200, the Falcon arrived much too late. Last edited by babsimov; 10 May 2024 at 01:59. |
||||||
10 May 2024, 03:32 | #4134 | ||||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,757
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Imagine you're Commodore and you bought 500,000 drives to put in A1200s, then a few months later 10% of them come back under warranty. Maybe it was just a bad batch of drives, but you will have to eat it because you didn't mount them according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Even worse, with thousands of customers wanting answers you can bet the subject of mounting angle will come up - and you will get the blame for it. 2.5" drives are generally at lower risk of bearing failure and head crashes due to the much lower mass of the platters and heads. This also allows them to spin up faster and down sooner, both to save power and prevent being damaged by bumps - which laptops experience a lot more than desktop computers. I'm betting 3.5" hard drives have lower reliability in the A1200 for these reasons too. It's natural to want move the keyboard around occasionally, and it may get bumped accidentally. For these reasons it would be better to have a separate box for the 3.5" hard drive. Unfortunately this would raise the price and make it less portable. |
||||
10 May 2024, 05:10 | #4135 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,075
|
Quote:
I dislike Falcon's 16-bit gimped 68030 CPU which locked out the built-in CPU's 32-bit expansion capability. AT&T marketed DSP3210 for 3D and multimedia acceleration. Quote:
|
||
10 May 2024, 05:35 | #4136 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 2,076
|
Dear god, this really is one of the WTHWTThinking design questions. For those who have never had an ST, it really can drive a man to tears since you have to lift the entire machine and then still fumble with the plug in a very narrow space.
Maybe not so much of a problem bitd for people who just connected it once and not changed anything for a long time, but for somebody like me in 2024 who rotates various machines on the desk often it's a big PITA. |
10 May 2024, 05:46 | #4137 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,075
|
Quote:
This is stated from Commodore the Inside Story - The Untold Tale of a Computer Giant book by David John Pleasance. Starting around page 126. Commodore UK advised Ali for A300 replacing C64c. Commodore Germany demanded a hard disk capable mass-produced Amiga model, hence A300 project's scope creep into A600. From David Pleasance's book: Code:
But in February or March 1991, after analysing the results from the UK Christmas sales, it became obvious that the C64 as a saleable product was dying – in fact, for all intents and purposes, it was dead. ... (skip, read the book for extra details) ... In September that year, all the general managers met in Frankfurt to agree the final basic specifications of the A300, (skip, read the book for extra details) ... It transpired that after our Frankfurt meeting the German subsidiary – who had clearly missed the whole point of the need and demand for the A300 – had underhandedly told Mehdi Ali that they could not and would not sell any Amiga that did not have a hard drive included, thereby sabotaging the whole well-thought-out plan to entice C64 buyers into an affordable upgrade path. Mehdi Ali simply rolled over and conceded, but never had the balls to talk to me or any other GM about the change of plan. This A600 would become a catastrophic disaster for the following reasons: Though it was smaller and had fewer features than the A500, it cost more to manufacture. Being called the A600 gave consumers the impression it was a higher specification machine than the A500, resulting in sales of the A500 slowing down significantly, virtually destroying that existing (and profitable) market. We had prematurely killed off the A500 by introducing the A600 instead of the planned A300 – and on which we made considerably less money. Consumers who bought the A600 believing it to be a superior model to A500 were very upset, believing they had been misled (which of course they had). The press, with whom we had an excellent relationship, absolutely lambasted our misguided rationale, and justifiably so. 1991 time waster's "A1000Jr" didn't have Gayle nor Budgie. A600 had Gayle (Gary replacement) chip. Budgie (Ramsey/cost-reduced Buster replacement) needs to be modified with Gayle. According to Commodore Germany's demands, AA500+ without hard disk capability is no go. Additional work is needed for AGA-based A1000+. My concept of AA500+ is just A500 with core AGA chipset, 68EC020, Fat Gary, Ramsey and 68020 local bus. Super Buster is needed for Zorro II/III expansion. A600 has extra TLL chips for CPU bus separation for PCMCIA (along with Gayle R&D) and Agnus's Custom Chip bus. Mehdi Ali has two significant information from Amiga's strongest markets i.e. UK and Germany. It's up to Mehdi Ali and Bill "PCJr" Sydnes to provide leadership and figure out a good path forward. Last edited by hammer; 10 May 2024 at 05:54. |
|
10 May 2024, 05:58 | #4138 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,757
|
Quote:
However Amiga hardware designers soon realized that they could make their own PCMCIA devices relatively cheaply because the bus interface was actually quite simple. Performance was good too, twice as fast as Zorro II when in the A1200. Ali was not responsible for putting PCMCIA on the A600 (and A1200). It was Jeff Porter, designer of the LCD portable and A500, who came up with the idea of putting PCMCIA in the A600. It was also his idea to drop the numeric keys and use smd to make the PCB and case smaller - all with the goal of making it cheaper (which was what Ali wanted). He put PCMCIA in it to replace the Zorro expansion port on the A500, which would be too large for the A600. As has been previously stated, the Germans wanted a hard drive in the A600 - a good idea IMO. The IDE interface was cheap and allowed the use of a physically smaller internal hard drive that matched the rest of the machine. Compared to the equivalent A500 setup this was a much cheaper solution. In late 1991 the A590 with 20MB XT-IDE drive was selling for £279. In mid 1992 an A600 with 20MB 2.5" drive cost only £95 more than the stock (floppy only) machine. With 2MB RAM the A590 cost £369. A 4MB PCMCIA card for the A600 cost £149. A 4MB RAM expansion box for the A500 cost £179. So having PCMCIA and IDE ports made the A600 cheaper to expand. You could have a 20MB hard drive and 4MB of FastRAM for £35 less than just the 20MB hard drive alone on the A500. |
|
10 May 2024, 06:14 | #4139 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,075
|
Quote:
In spec they say.. [ Show youtube player ] From Hardware Unboxed. Intel CPUs Are Crashing & It's Intel's Fault. There's an email trail. |
|
10 May 2024, 06:22 | #4140 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,757
|
Those TTL chips isolate the PCMCIA port from the CPU bus. This was a cheap solution with practically zero development costs, and important to prevent possible ESD damage to sensitive custom chips etc.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A1200 RF module removal pics + A1200 chips overview | eXeler0 | Hardware pics | 2 | 08 March 2017 00:09 |
Sale - 2 auctions: A1200 mobo + flickerfixer & A1200 tower case w/ kit | blakespot | MarketPlace | 0 | 27 August 2015 18:50 |
For Sale - A1200/A1000/IndiAGA MkII/A1200 Trapdoor Ram & Other Goodies! | fitzsteve | MarketPlace | 1 | 11 December 2012 10:32 |
Trading A1200 030 acc and A1200 indivision for Amiga stuff | 8bitbubsy | MarketPlace | 17 | 14 December 2009 21:50 |
Trade Mac g3 300/400 or A1200 for an A1200 accellerator | BiL0 | MarketPlace | 0 | 07 June 2006 17:41 |
|
|