14 January 2024, 00:20 | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,752
|
Quote:
Of course this wouldn't be such a problem in a larger case, as we saw with the A4000. But then you get the down side - this onboard RAM would be slower than a fast CPU, so you end up having to put RAM on the accelerator card anyway for best performance. |
|
14 January 2024, 00:26 | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Bicester
Posts: 2,023
|
for me I would have preferred the A1200 came with a HDD ~40mb minimum as standard, the cpu on a card in the belly slot with an option for fast memory on it rather than on the main board, and options for alternative configurations from the resellers.
if the memory could have been configured at start-up to 1mb chip and 1mb "real" fast (as in the cpu has full access al the time) it would have been a nice touch as a lot of older software didn't need 2mb of chip ram but would run better with the addition of fast ram. |
14 January 2024, 00:56 | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Norwich
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
I do think a 1MB Fast, 1 MB Chip split would've worked better overall. I know Commodore supposedly asked coders what they wanted, but I think the final call to go that way given how much it slows computation was definitely a mistake. |
|
14 January 2024, 00:58 | #24 | |||||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,752
|
Quote:
But when the A1200 was released (after the A600 and everyone thought nothing else was coming) developers were still working on A500 games. They weren't going to drop what they were doing to work on AGA titles instead when there were hardly any users. So they had plenty of time to 'grow into' the A1200 before becoming concerned about whether it had enough power. When we see what is being developed for the A500 today, it's obvious that the stock A1200's power was not fully utilized. Take Dread for example, it runs smooth as butter on a stock A1200 - my 50MHz 030 is too fast for it! Quote:
But the PCMCIA slot turned out to be quite useful. The only problem was a lack of suitable cards. To fix this I would have produced a PCMCIA 'breakout' board to help developers (and hobbyists!) make products for it. I would also explain that Amiga PCMCIA cards didn't have to be PC compatible so they could be made much simpler and cheaper. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
14 January 2024, 01:15 | #25 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,988
|
Quote:
|
|
14 January 2024, 01:22 | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: France
Posts: 656
|
I would required a really usable VGA mode from the techies and market the A1200 around this new capacity. Cheap VGA monitors where flooding the market and it was now the norm.
The A1200 have minimal VGA capacity and was delivered with an adaptor, which show Commodore thought of it, but it was unusable. At the slightest opportunity, the Workbench was falling back in OCS resolution. And the mode was only in 4 colours (Productivity mode) and slow. So, yeah, a bit of fast RAM and a least 16 colours so 2 more bitplans. I would have initiated a change in the politic too: Several configurations in stock available from the start. Thanks to the cpu on board. So you show your platform is sustainable for the futur because expandable like a PC. And you make money by selling the upgrade. |
14 January 2024, 01:51 | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Roma
Posts: 349
|
Ugh, when will all these what-if scenarios stop...?
|
14 January 2024, 02:28 | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,988
|
|
14 January 2024, 03:14 | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northampton/UK
Posts: 531
|
C= has a tiny of money and time: 512k/1MB fast ram, bodged HD disk drive like A4000
C=Has a bit more money & Time: 512k/1MB fast ram, Bodged slow HD disk drive, buffered IDE for master and slave, increase case size as necessary to fit a third party CD ROM (optional purchase with machine, bundle demo disk and a couple of the best CDTV titles). C= commodore some how has cash and time: As above-full speed HD floppy, remove PCMCIA, expand clock port into modem slot. update custom chips, 16 bit sound, new sprites,increase copper speed somehow to get Low Res chunky etc. Increase ROM, OS boots from rom, put battery backed up storage RAM on the mother board (to save WB prefs, update libs, save games etc - mabe 128/256k). Pretty up the OS, make WB Asynch. Hope for the best it isn't to late. Maybe scan doubler for Amiga TV modes, MIDI ports. Gt ST devs onboad - (it's not doing great, they have some great software, same processor should make it a bit easier) , to late to grab MAC most devs. |
14 January 2024, 03:51 | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Ireland
Posts: 692
|
Change chip RAM to VRAM to increase bandwidth, chunky mode(bypassing DMA slots for video), 68030/25MHz, 2 Meg Fastrsm, and room in the case/compatibility with 3.5Inch harddrives.
Charge £550 quid for that config snd it would have been a winner! |
14 January 2024, 08:05 | #31 | ||||
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,752
|
Quote:
Quote:
From Commodore the Final Years:- Quote:
In doing so I would simply be doing what Irving Gould was expecting. Gould was let down by the engineering department. After stating in an interview with Amiga Computing magazine in early 1991 that a new chipset was expected 'this Fall', they delivered nothing. Amiga fans were expecting it too. Imagine how differently we have felt about Commodore if the engineering department had gotten the job done instead of dashing our hopes and embarrassing Gould. Sydnes' (or was it Eggelbrecht's) decision to switch the A1000 Plus to the ECS chipset was a bad one, 'forced' by the slow progress of AA. The main reason for that was that AA was just a backup in case AAA didn't get finished in time. 15 engineers were wasting their time on AAA. I would have switched the priorities around to put AA first, letting go of the 'deadwood' and just keeping the best engineers for the job. Ali would have been pleased with that cost cutting and greater commitment to completing AA on time. Dave Haynie had his A3000+ prototype booting with an early version of the AA chipset in February 1991. It shouldn't have taken over a year to get it finished. All that fancy stuff they were trying to do with AAA could wait. Gould had all but publicly committed Commodore to getting something out in 1991. Why couldn't they? Bill Sydnes was hired on May 1990 to head the PC engineering division, but was soon poking his nose into the Amiga side too. As we all know he was a PC guy with no knowledge or the Amiga or enthusiasm for it. Had I been in that role in 1991 it would have been a different story. I would get AA out on time. Gould would be happy, Ali would be happy, and Amiga fans would be happy. You said, Quote:
|
||||
14 January 2024, 08:25 | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Poland
Posts: 868
|
15 engineers were developing AAA because in the long run that was the only project which was revolutionary enough to maintain a technological lead in a future to come. AA and even AA+ couldn't do that. And since it was already a placeholder for bigger AAA which was not directly compatible with AA anyway (and only partially with ECS) there really was no actual need to move team from more perspective AAA into placeholder AA. If anything it was wrong to do AA in the first place instead of using all those resources to actually fix and finalize AAA on time. 68EC030 is no MMU and going even higher than already bottlenecked 14MHz. Obviously to meet the demand for memory access it only makes sense to get on-board fast ram as well. And that requires some additional logic. Some bigger PLD or enhancements for other chip inside chipset to do DRAM memory interface for 25MHz 030. With accelerators in trapdoor "fast ram" would be kind of a s"low ram" instead - just like on board fast is on A4000 because timings wouldn't suit even faster CPUs well. But that's beside the point because Amiga memory management can handle that fairly well anyway.
Last edited by Promilus; 14 January 2024 at 08:32. |
14 January 2024, 10:38 | #33 |
Guru Meditating
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: England
Posts: 2,356
|
I would say ship it with the following:
1) keep 2MB chip and add some fast ram 2) a 20MB or 40MB HDD 3) a faster cpu (28mhz 020 maybe?) ideally do all three but that would probably be too expensive for it to be viable as an A500 upgrade, so prioritse the first two. A Dec 1992 advert in AF from Power Computer listed an IBM 40MB IDE HDD at £200, so could C= have done a 20MB one for an extra 100-150, or a 40 for 150-200 extra? |
14 January 2024, 10:51 | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Figueira da Foz
Posts: 426
|
I would remove CPU from the mainboard and provide it with a standard 68020 board with ram slots. Then I could introduce as standard at least with 1mb fast ram
|
14 January 2024, 11:35 | #35 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,988
|
Quote:
Ive been thinking along these lines too. The concept of no cpu on the mainboard was used on the A4000 which came before the A1200 after all… |
|
14 January 2024, 11:37 | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Madrid
Posts: 141
|
In those years. Anything that would have made a 1200 run DOOM and MP3s smoothly would have been decisive in computer sales.
|
14 January 2024, 11:38 | #37 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sweden
Age: 50
Posts: 2,988
|
Quote:
Probably they should have made the A1200 case a wee bit larger so you could fit a 3.5” drive. My first hdd in the A1200 was a 60 MB and it was fine, a friend had a 20MB and that was too small, even back then. 40MB is the absolute minimum. |
|
14 January 2024, 12:14 | #38 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Figueira da Foz
Posts: 426
|
Mine had a 3'5" HD, I think the problem back then was that not all hd were supported driver wise
|
14 January 2024, 12:30 | #39 |
Inviyya Dude!
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Amiga Island
Posts: 2,798
|
Same specs, but two years earlier...
|
14 January 2024, 12:45 | #40 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,967
|
plus, Muzza Turrican2 AGA released back then
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I’m looking for any military spec Amigas please | Pyromania | request.Other | 12 | 10 May 2020 13:03 |
Launched a web server on A1200 with 2MB RAM | damex | Amiga websites reviews | 0 | 18 January 2020 13:11 |
Buying Amiga A1200 for games - best spec? | pault2007 | Nostalgia & memories | 22 | 06 August 2007 14:36 |
out of box spec for A1200? + other ?? | technium | support.Hardware | 5 | 27 August 2004 10:21 |
Dream A1200 spec | Antiriad | Amiga scene | 14 | 19 August 2002 01:29 |
|
|