OS 3.2 startup-sequence, general questions - Page 2

Thomas Richter · 09 June 2024, 09:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProfPlum

Below was sufficient not to cause any errors, placed at the top of the startup-sequence.

This does *not* do the same. It only replaces a fraction of the modules (namely icon and workbench), whereas LoadModule will pick up all modules it can find, and there was substantially more updated than icon and workbench.

PeterK · 09 June 2024, 17:31

If you add the contents of the directories Devs, L and Libs from a floppy image like "ModulesA2000_3.2.2.adf" to your OS 3.2.x installation and ensure that the protection bits are copied too (with Copy ... CLONE, or by using DOpus4) then the startup-sequence line "LoadModule L:System-Startup ROMUPDATE" will update OS 3.1 or Caffeine correctly and you won't need any RemLib commands.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
startup-sequence	jarre	Coders. General	7	22 October 2018 10:34
3.9 Startup Sequence	dannyp1	Amiga scene	2	04 January 2016 20:56
startup-sequence	mai	support.Other	10	01 June 2010 21:39
Startup-Sequence	blade002	support.Apps	8	04 April 2008 19:06
Need help with startup-sequence	lopos2000	support.Apps	5	01 August 2005 11:54

09 June 2024, 17:31	#22
PeterK Registered User Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: digital hell, Germany, after 1984, but worse Posts: 3,383	If you add the contents of the directories Devs, L and Libs from a floppy image like "ModulesA2000_3.2.2.adf" to your OS 3.2.x installation and ensure that the protection bits are copied too (with Copy ... CLONE, or by using DOpus4) then the startup-sequence line "LoadModule L:System-Startup ROMUPDATE" will update OS 3.1 or Caffeine correctly and you won't need any RemLib commands.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)