English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > abime.net - Hosted Projects > project.ClassicWB

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 06 May 2011, 12:16   #21
terexuk
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: leicester
Posts: 196
thanks for the pic steve, my jumpers are set differently ,will have to read the manual now its been translated and try those settings of yours on mine. for some reason i thought 4gb limit was partition size not overall size(god knows why!!) so thats something else to look into !!

once again thanks for all the help

regards terexuk


Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzsteve View Post
Hey terexuk, no probs at all!

Firstly if you're using a HDD >4gb you need to patch the SCSI.Device as the default A1200 SCSI.Device only supports up to 4gb, this could be causing an issue. However if you have a smaller drive (or better still a CF for ease of setup) give that a try

I don't remember what the settings were for on my old M-Tec, but I took this picture, and these are the settings I used:

(click to see large image)

terexuk is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 13:54   #22
FOL
PSPUAE DEV
 
FOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 6,020
Send a message via MSN to FOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by terexuk View Post
thanks for the pic steve, my jumpers are set differently ,will have to read the manual now its been translated and try those settings of yours on mine. for some reason i thought 4gb limit was partition size not overall size(god knows why!!) so thats something else to look into !!

once again thanks for all the help

regards terexuk
Aye, 4GB for whole drive and 2GB for boot partitions.

Last edited by FOL; 06 May 2011 at 18:16.
FOL is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 14:48   #23
cosmicfrog
The 1 who ribbits
 
cosmicfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: leek, Staffs, UK
Age: 56
Posts: 3,557
Send a message via MSN to cosmicfrog
gee 2G is not a partion limit. you should know this FOL !!!

but saying that and especially on FFS your would`t really want to make partions that are bigger than 2Gig
cosmicfrog is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 15:01   #24
FOL
PSPUAE DEV
 
FOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 6,020
Send a message via MSN to FOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicfrog View Post
gee 2G is not a partion limit. you should know this FOL !!!

but saying that and especially on FFS your would`t really want to make partions that are bigger than 2Gig
Huh?

He hasnt mentioned SFS, so we can only guess he is using FFS.
He is also using standard 3.1.
So the limit is 4GB for drive and 2gb for boot partitions.

Dont forget you need both filesystem and scsi.device to support larger drives.

Last edited by FOL; 06 May 2011 at 15:06.
FOL is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 17:15   #25
cosmicfrog
The 1 who ribbits
 
cosmicfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: leek, Staffs, UK
Age: 56
Posts: 3,557
Send a message via MSN to cosmicfrog
I am talking about FFS, you could if you so wished have one partion that is 4gig, you would`t want to but you could.

me shouts THOMAS

if I`m wrong I`ll eat all my chocchip cookies in one go,
but that aside all your info is correct so don`t be put off terexuk and use the settings FOL suggests
cosmicfrog is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 17:36   #26
FOL
PSPUAE DEV
 
FOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 6,020
Send a message via MSN to FOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicfrog View Post
I am talking about FFS, you could if you so wished have one partion that is 4gig, you would`t want to but you could.

me shouts THOMAS

if I`m wrong I`ll eat all my chocchip cookies in one go,
but that aside all your info is correct so don`t be put off terexuk and use the settings FOL suggests
The standard Kickstart 3.1 would not see the partition and would'nt boot.
Thats why it has to be under 2GB.
FOL is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 17:46   #27
Retro-Nerd
Missile Command Champion
 
Retro-Nerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 52
Posts: 12,453
With standard settings, yes. But of course you can patch the FFS and scsi.device and then you have no problems with large partitions under KS 3.0/3.1.

http://thomas-rapp.homepage.t-online...hdd/index.html


http://translate.google.com/translat...d%2Findex.html
Retro-Nerd is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 17:49   #28
FOL
PSPUAE DEV
 
FOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 6,020
Send a message via MSN to FOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retro-Nerd View Post
With standard settings, yes. But of course you can patch the FFS and scsi.device and then you have no problems with large partitions under KS 3.0/3.1.

http://thomas-rapp.homepage.t-online...hdd/index.html


http://translate.google.com/translat...d%2Findex.html
Again, that is of no use if the HDD doesnt boot due to the boot partition being over 2GB.
It has to boot, to be able to patch the scsi and use new filesystem.

This is gone way off topic.
FOL is offline  
Old 06 May 2011, 18:30   #29
terexuk
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: leicester
Posts: 196
just to reiterate as i mentioned earlier the drive is split into 500mb boot partition then 3 partitions all under 2gb i was forgetting about the 4gb limit as a whole.
I was using std ffs with 3.1 but am now going to use the patched ffs and scsi.device included with classicwb hoping this will sort the problem
terexuk is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 11:10   #30
Hewitson
Registered User
 
Hewitson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 41
Posts: 3,773
I'd suggest using SFS. It'll require reformatting your partitions, but it's well worth the trouble.
Hewitson is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 12:40   #31
cosmicfrog
The 1 who ribbits
 
cosmicfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: leek, Staffs, UK
Age: 56
Posts: 3,557
Send a message via MSN to cosmicfrog
I must admit I have not tried a Bootable partion greater than 2gig well if i have I can`t remember but that will defo be one of the things I`ll try when I get round to it

terexuk, your partions sound fine, good luck with the bigger ones after your have patched the scsi.device and ffs
cosmicfrog is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 12:43   #32
terexuk
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: leicester
Posts: 196
OK , after much fu.. faffing about this is where im at:

Things ive done:

repartitoned drive using the sfs filesystem (ahead of you there hewitson ) using killagorillas guide ,500 mb wb partition ,2 1500 partitions replaced scsi.device with v43 this boots in winuae from drive gives recoverable error alert in real miggy naming scsi.device as problem

as above but deleting v43 scsi.device boots in winuae, fails at fblit in real miggy

replaced f4 and f5 keys after pinging them off whilst reseating hd cradle

booted from install disk to check drive in real miggy all ok, all partitions showing and accessible

reread guide then realised i had,nt set buffers too 100 set buffers to 100 ,instant crash in real miggy

reset to 30 fails at fblit

checked stock of vodka, got hammered (this was last night)

over to you guys ,
off too get paracetemol
terexuk is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 13:17   #33
fitzsteve
Professional slacker!
 
fitzsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Age: 44
Posts: 6,683
Send a message via MSN to fitzsteve
@FOL,

Do you think this could be a Motherboard timing issue?

@Terexuk,

I'm happy to prep up a CF card for you and send it for you to test, with adapter.

You'll have to send it back when you're done, but at least it could rule out other issues.

Steve.
fitzsteve is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 13:22   #34
FOL
PSPUAE DEV
 
FOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales / UK
Age: 45
Posts: 6,020
Send a message via MSN to FOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzsteve View Post
@FOL,

Do you think this could be a Motherboard timing issue?

@Terexuk,

I'm happy to prep up a CF card for you and send it for you to test, with adapter.

You'll have to send it back when you're done, but at least it could rule out other issues.

Steve.
But it works with a standard install of 3.1. So doubtful.

@terexuk;
How about trying Amigasys or a lower spec version of CWB.

Could be the CF, I have had some give lots of wierd errors even when setup correctly.
FOL is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 13:32   #35
terexuk
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: leicester
Posts: 196
@fitzsteve

that maybe an option later,thanks got a couple of different drives i want to try first using fols suggestion of using a lower version of cwb.
as i said before i can install a vanilla workbench no problems
terexuk is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 15:19   #36
terexuk
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: leicester
Posts: 196
ok quick update , tried another hd crashed at fblit as before

installed classicwb full crashed again at fblit then crashed at caprefs

so ive edited them out and can now reach the workbench which will have to do for now until something turns up to solve the problem.

this card just doesnt like fblit or class act it seems .
terexuk is offline  
Old 07 May 2011, 20:42   #37
terexuk
Users Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: leicester
Posts: 196
success !!!
After another frustrating day finally cracked it !! It was the card all along see here
http://nl.aminet.net/docs/help/mtec6803.readme

apparently the jumper settings printed on the board and in the manual are wrong after swapping too the correct settings it booted up first time into a shiny new classic wb ,what a ballache tho, thanks to all for there help in particular fitzsteve and fol
terexuk is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Now my CF card wont boot.. I could cry CritAnime support.Hardware 25 04 December 2011 03:33
Mysterious double boot ClassicWB ADV SP Rishca project.ClassicWB 11 11 July 2011 17:25
classicwb adv lambrettadave project.ClassicWB 7 27 October 2010 16:13
Files not found. ClassicWB ADV / WB 3.1 Macca project.ClassicWB 3 24 May 2008 15:18
A1200 wont work stable if 030 card is removed? ElectroBlaster support.Hardware 1 10 November 2003 00:02

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:05.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.11477 seconds with 13 queries