English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Main > Nostalgia & memories

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 24 February 2022, 19:51   #2921
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,876
Floppy drive buffers will go into Chip RAM.
Jope is offline  
Old 01 March 2022, 09:58   #2922
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,247
In this generality, no. The trackdisk.device has a track buffer for each unit, but the buffers of the file system for the floppy are as of Kickstart 2.04 no longer required to reside in chip memory. The trackdisk.device can decode and encode MFM data fine from fast memory. Thus, there is no BUFMEMTYPE kludge needed for the trackdisk.device anymore, since quite a long time.
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 01 March 2022, 10:38   #2923
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,876
Good that it's fixed. With 1.3 you still need the kludge if you wish to mount FFS floppies. :-)
Jope is offline  
Old 01 March 2022, 22:53   #2924
dgurv
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Ireland
Posts: 23
Extension cable for expansions?

Is it possible to connect an extension cable to the side expansion port of an Amiga 500 to locate an expansion card such as ACA500plus more discretely out of sight?

If so, what type of cable would I use? Thank you!
dgurv is offline  
Old 02 March 2022, 12:10   #2925
van_dammesque
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: England
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgurv View Post
Is it possible to connect an extension cable to the side expansion port of an Amiga 500 to locate an expansion card such as ACA500plus more discretely out of sight?

If so, what type of cable would I use? Thank you!
I doubt it as there would be significant interference being picked up and thus disrupting the signals. I maybe proved wrong though!
van_dammesque is offline  
Old 02 March 2022, 13:22   #2926
dgurv
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Ireland
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by van_dammesque View Post
I doubt it as there would be significant interference being picked up and thus disrupting the signals. I maybe proved wrong though!
Thanks. I hadn’t considered interference. Happy to find out otherwise if it’s not the case. I’m just weary of something wedged out the side (not that it will stop me buying one)
dgurv is offline  
Old 03 March 2022, 16:44   #2927
Daedalus
Registered User
 
Daedalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,369
There are a few factors at play. The longer the cable, the more susceptible it would be to noise and signal degradation and the less likely it might be to work. Also, devices using newer technology grafted onto these old systems tend to be less tolerant of noise and degradation than devices from back in the day, so you might find that an extension works fine with an A590 for example, but not the ACA.

I've extended the expansion bus of an A1200 (which is much faster than the A500 expansion bus) using around 10cm of ribbon cable to relocate an accelerator. This works just fine with my Blizzard 1230, but I haven't tried it with any modern devices.
Daedalus is offline  
Old 05 March 2022, 20:40   #2928
dreadnought
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 1,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by alkis21 View Post
You need to press '0' on the keypad. But I don't remember if it works in the Amiga version.
Thanks...I've tried it, but no dice. I think this trick is actually for the Fate Of Atlantis, in the Last Crusade you just have to git gud or something (sigh).


New question: is there any way to control the overscan colour in Workbench? I don't know if it's really "overscan" but I'm struggling for terms.

Let's say my WB (40.42, I think it's ClassicWB, am using it on MiSTer+CRT TV) itself has some desktop colour and that's all good, but the area outside the active field (the one where I can move the mouse) is black.

And on my real Amiga, some other WB (I think standard 3.1 from ACA500+) has grey colour in that area.
dreadnought is offline  
Old 05 March 2022, 20:45   #2929
duga
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadnought View Post
Thanks...I've tried it, but no dice. I think this trick is actually for the Fate Of Atlantis, in the Last Crusade you just have to git gud or something (sigh).


New question: is there any way to control the overscan colour in Workbench? I don't know if it's really "overscan" but I'm struggling for terms.

Let's say my WB (40.42, I think it's ClassicWB, am using it on MiSTer+CRT TV) itself has some desktop colour and that's all good, but the area outside the active field (the one where I can move the mouse) is black.

And on my real Amiga, some other WB (I think standard 3.1 from ACA500+) has grey colour in that area.
You mean Borderblank?
duga is offline  
Old 05 March 2022, 21:06   #2930
dreadnought
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 1,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by duga View Post
You mean Borderblank?
Umm..no idea, maybe?


I mean the area between WB's active field and WinUAE's border. Here (ClassicWB) it's black:





And here (standard WB) it is grey:





I'd like it to be grey - or some other colour if possible - in the ClassicWB too.
dreadnought is offline  
Old 05 March 2022, 22:12   #2931
Daedalus
Registered User
 
Daedalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, then Glasgow
Posts: 6,369
Normally the overscan is whatever colour 0 is set to, but there are various patches that turn off the drawing in the overscan area (which is a feature that came in with ECS), effectively turning the border black. ClassicWB (and most other preconfigured environments) include lots of patches that you'll need to look through to see if you can disable it. BorderBlank is a stand-alone utility that does this, but it could also be in MCP or other multipurpose patches.
Daedalus is offline  
Old 06 March 2022, 15:12   #2932
dreadnought
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 1,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daedalus View Post
ClassicWB (and most other preconfigured environments) include lots of patches that you'll need to look through to see if you can disable it.
Thanks, but I wouldn't have a first clue as to what to look for or how to disable it...my WB mastery ends at opening drawers and clicking on icons

Actually, now that I know this is normal behaviour I'm more ok with it. I was just worried it might be something wrong with the way MiSTer displays Minimig on a CRT TV.
dreadnought is offline  
Old 06 March 2022, 15:54   #2933
Nightshft
Registered User
 
Nightshft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Austria
Posts: 617
I took a quick look at ClassicWB Lite.

- s:/user-startup calls c:BorderBlank
which can be disabled by just putting a ";" at the beginning of the line

- in WBStartup there is "Copper". The CopperDaemon which generates the background color gradient. In its IconInfo there is a tooltype "BordBlank" which can be deactivated by putting brackets around it, like "(BordBlank)". Dont forget to push <Enter> and Save.

However there seems to be at least a third tool that activates BorderBlank as the border still is black
Nightshft is offline  
Old 09 March 2022, 14:42   #2934
dgurv
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Ireland
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daedalus View Post
There are a few factors at play. The longer the cable, the more susceptible it would be to noise and signal degradation and the less likely it might be to work. Also, devices using newer technology grafted onto these old systems tend to be less tolerant of noise and degradation than devices from back in the day, so you might find that an extension works fine with an A590 for example, but not the ACA.

I've extended the expansion bus of an A1200 (which is much faster than the A500 expansion bus) using around 10cm of ribbon cable to relocate an accelerator. This works just fine with my Blizzard 1230, but I haven't tried it with any modern devices.
Thanks Daedalus, good to get your experience.
dgurv is offline  
Old 09 March 2022, 14:50   #2935
dgurv
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Ireland
Posts: 23
If I add a hard disk drive to Amiga 500, either in the form of ACA500plus or PiStorm, will I be able to boot from a floppy if I have one inserted at power on?

Will I have a convenient way of seeing the insert floppy disk screen?
dgurv is offline  
Old 09 March 2022, 15:20   #2936
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,876
Per default it will attempt to boot an inserted floppy before booting from hard disk partitions. This is related to your partitions' boot priorities. DF0 is pri 5 and usually your bootable hard disk partition is pri 0, unless you have manually changed it.

If you are running kickstart 3.0 or newer, you can use BootCtrl to hide your hard disk partitions. That would probably be the most convenient way of seeing the insert floppy screen.

Under kickstart 1.3 you need to physically disconnect or power down the hard disk or edit your partition table to remove bootable flags from your partitions if you want the insert disk screen.

In practice we usually don't bother with this, at least I personally just insert the disk I want to boot from and reset the Amiga.
Jope is offline  
Old 18 March 2022, 21:01   #2937
dreadnought
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 1,976
I'm trying to create a hdf using this "Minimig hdf creation" guide. It's a bit old but mostly ok, I had used it before and successfuly made some hdfs.

But now I get stuck on the step where you're supposed to Partition Drive. I delete the existing partition. Then try to drag the slider to fill the one big partition, but every time I get past 1GB, it gets a bit weird, size starts counting from zero and I'm unable to create that whole partition (only some fractional ones).

I'm totally stumped since this hasn't been happening before. I have some hdfs bigger than 1GB which were made using this method, so not sure what's up (I'm using WB 3.1 disk for HD toolbox).
dreadnought is offline  
Old 18 March 2022, 22:41   #2938
slaapliedje
Registered User
 
slaapliedje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadnought View Post
I'm trying to create a hdf using this "Minimig hdf creation" guide. It's a bit old but mostly ok, I had used it before and successfuly made some hdfs.

But now I get stuck on the step where you're supposed to Partition Drive. I delete the existing partition. Then try to drag the slider to fill the one big partition, but every time I get past 1GB, it gets a bit weird, size starts counting from zero and I'm unable to create that whole partition (only some fractional ones).

I'm totally stumped since this hasn't been happening before. I have some hdfs bigger than 1GB which were made using this method, so not sure what's up (I'm using WB 3.1 disk for HD toolbox).
I thought Workbench 3.1 only supported 1GB of space for the first partition. The others after the first can be larger. Though that might be that it'll only boot on partitions that are 1GB or smaller.
slaapliedje is offline  
Old 19 March 2022, 08:57   #2939
Thomas Richter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadnought View Post
I'm totally stumped since this hasn't been happening before. I have some hdfs bigger than 1GB which were made using this method, so not sure what's up (I'm using WB 3.1 disk for HD toolbox).
The HDToolBox from 3.1 and the file system of 3.1 are completely unable to handle partitions larger than 4GB, or reach any data beyond the 4GB boundary. To get around this, you need at least 3.9 which can do that (albeit in a kludgy way) or 3.1.4, which supports larger partitions and drives out of the box.
Thomas Richter is offline  
Old 19 March 2022, 09:50   #2940
dreadnought
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 1,976
I know about the 4GB limit, but the image I'm creating atm is only 1.5GB. I also made some ~1.5GB -2.5GB images in recent months and I'm pretty sure it was using exactly this guide/method (though it's possible I'm missing something simple).

Is it true that WB 3.1 can only make a 1GB partition + the rest, not a one big one?

Do you know any other guide, preferably written, on how to make hdfs?
dreadnought is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gamebase Amiga - 2 Questions Fiery Phoenix New to Emulation or Amiga scene 8 13 August 2012 12:31
Amiga CD32 questions pubzombie New to Emulation or Amiga scene 26 24 January 2010 16:27
A few general Amiga questions. Hougham support.Hardware 6 30 April 2008 22:13
Amiga A4000 Questions mfletcher support.Hardware 8 29 April 2008 10:51
Amiga 600 Questions JDunlap support.Hardware 14 20 January 2008 19:13

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:53.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.15143 seconds with 14 queries