15 August 2024, 13:44 | #61 |
Thalion Webshrine
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 14,629
|
I think the chips ARE all engraved with a number vertically on the LHS but they are too hard to read in the photos. It would be interesting to know what that number is and if they are all the same
|
15 August 2024, 14:44 | #62 |
Italian Amiga Zealot
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 1,927
|
|
15 August 2024, 19:13 | #63 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Sammamish, WA, USA
Posts: 23
|
|
16 August 2024, 04:34 | #64 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,007
|
I don't want to worry you but there's a chance these 060's might be illegal and counterfeit. You should send one to me for extended testing and validation and if I find anything wrong with it, I will email you and then post about it and after I have confirmed the faults and/or illegality, I will send it back. This may take some time as I am a very busy man.
|
16 August 2024, 06:14 | #65 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: australia
Posts: 585
|
The Motorola logo is wrong -- the space between it and the part number is too big...
|
17 August 2024, 19:01 | #66 |
0ld0r Git
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,726
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
68060 Rev.1 Superscalar bug? | phx | Coders. Asm / Hardware | 19 | 27 December 2021 14:53 |
Wanted - 68060 Rev 6 | Retro-mania | MarketPlace | 48 | 06 August 2020 23:14 |
68060 rev. errata and performance impact? | gdonner | support.Hardware | 6 | 24 April 2019 18:43 |
Difference between a 68060 rev 5 and 6 | Syntrax | support.Hardware | 2 | 10 February 2019 21:23 |
WTB: 68060 Rev 6 71E41J | TjLaZer | MarketPlace | 3 | 03 January 2016 14:10 |
|
|