28 June 2024, 10:28 | #5201 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scunthorpe/United Kingdom
Posts: 2,100
|
They are now because you can't keep up with school work without access to a PC or the internet any more. Back in the day... different story.
The Amiga was a games machine first and foremost, and seen as such especially after the 500 launched. Hands up you all who used an Amiga at school? Not many, huh. My parents refused to fund an Amiga for me - I had to save up for it myself. That's why I pirated games, because they refused to buy them. I would probably have had more success asking for a Mac, but even then I was probably too young to have anything like that. |
28 June 2024, 10:47 | #5202 |
Ex nihilo nihil
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: CH
Posts: 5,057
|
|
28 June 2024, 11:15 | #5203 |
C= and Amiga aficionado!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Italy
Posts: 328
|
Not at school unfortunately, BUT asking parents to fund a home computer purchase to study was very common I'd say, heck I started doing that with the VIC20 and I guess it worked.
Specifically with the Amiga, thanks to Transformer I was able to avoid purchasing a PCs for a very good while. Performance was obviously, err, let's say not exactly spectacular... but on the other hand it wasn't like I was pushing the DOS side that hard, it was good enough for my coding homework. An A1200 would have been obviously way better, but it didn't exist yet at the time (and big box Amigas were too expensive) |
28 June 2024, 11:28 | #5204 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scunthorpe/United Kingdom
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
They were a passing fad, you see? Quote:
By the time I got a 1200 it was a gift from my GF to upgrade from my unexpanded 512k A1000. It was absolute heaven to use. |
||
28 June 2024, 15:33 | #5205 | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
Many education-issued laptops are Chromebooks that can't boot Windows despite a common X86 CPU i.e. missing "Designed for Windows" UEFI ACPI. Chromebooks are not "PC". The Amiga platform is not backed by a powerful Google. Current mainstream platforms are ChromeOS/Android, Windows 10/11/SteamOS 3 (faking Windows gaming), and MacOS X ARM. They are all little endian. Vulkan API is little endian. These three platforms are backed by powerful corporations. Quote:
Hint: where I did obtain a Mac ROM image for my A3000. Quote:
My family had two computers starting from 1991 i.e. my dad's work PC was brought home i.e. ex-corporate IBM PS/2 Model 55 SX (dated 1989, 3 years old), and our 1989 purchased A500 Rev 6A. Cinemaware TV Sports games are major games for my Dad. Corporate upgraded into 486DX PCs. IBM PS/2 Model 55SX (386SX-16 with 387 FPU) was later traded for a 386DX-33/ET4000-based PC clone in Q4 1992 i.e. the main reason is PC games. My A500 Rev 6A was traded into A3000 in Q1 1992 and my school friend abandoned his broken A500 Rev5 when his family purchased a 486DX-33 based PC. Due to IBM VGA, the IBM PS/2 Model 55SX is garbage for games. Commodore has no problems beating IBM VGA in games, it's SVGA clones. During COVID-19 lockdown, this broken A500 Rev5 was later discovered to have a busted PSU and it was replaced, its chips repopulated my second A500 Rev 6A motherboard with ECS Agnus A. The broken A500 Rev5 was in storage since late 1992 and carried over to my new house in Y2000. My parents are white-collar types with state government jobs i.e. government insurance and government legal. Last edited by hammer; 28 June 2024 at 15:47. |
|||
28 June 2024, 16:33 | #5206 | ||||||||||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
Quote:
WordStar and WordPerfect dominated PC's text-based UI word processing market and their leadership was weakened by MS Windows 2.x and WinWord(1989). When my A3000 had Shapeshifter in 1995, MS Word and Excel for Mac were installed. IBM OS/2 1.x targeted 16-bit 286 and IBM lost the leadership to Windows 2.1 386. The Mac ports of GUI Excel in 1988 and WinWord in 1989 and set the ideal storm situation for Windows 3.0's 1990 tsunami. My ex-corporate IBM PS/2 Model 55SX had Windows 3.0 installed. I didn't bother installing IBM's OS/2 1.3. From work, my Dad brought home Harvard Graphics, IBM DisplayWrite 4, and IBM PC DOS 3.30. PC DOS 3.3's double-density boot disk was used for my Transformer emulator on A500. My Dad's work, Sydney WaterBoard has the IBM 386/486 PC fleet from 1990 to 1993. Quote:
Quote:
From https://www.intel.fr/content/dam/doc...ual-report.pdf Intel reported the following 1. In 1994's fourth quarter, Pentium unit sales accounted for 23 percent of Intel's desktop processor volume. 2. Millions of Pentiums were shipped. 3. During Q4 1993 and 1994, a typical PC purchase was a computer featuring the Intel 486 chip. 4. Net 1994 revenue reached $11.5 billion. 5. Net 1993 revenue reached $8.7 billion. 6. Growing demand and production for Intel 486 resulted in a sharp decline in sales for Intel 386 from 1992 to 1993. 7. Sales of the Intel 486 family comprised the majority of Intel's revenue during 1992, 1993, and 1994. 8. Intel reached its 6 to 7 million Pentiums shipped goal during 1994. This is only 23 percent unit volume. Before 1992, 386 dominated Intel's sales. According to Dataquest November 1989, VGA crossed more than 50 percent market share in 1989 i.e. 56%. http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/c...lysis_1989.pdf Low-End PC Graphics Market Share by Standard Type Estimated Worldwide History and Forecast Total low-end PC graphic chipset shipment history and forecast 1987 = 9.2. million, VGA 16.4% market share i.e. 1.5088 million VGA. 1988 = 11.1 million, VGA 34.2% i.e. 1.51 million VGA. 1989 = 13.7 million, VGA 54.6% i.e. 3.80 million VGA. 1990 = 14.3 million, VGA 66.4% i.e. 9.50 million VGA. 1991 = 15.8 million, VGA 76.6% i.e. 12.10 million VGA. 1992 = 16.4 million, VGA 84.2% i.e. 13.81 million VGA. 1993 = 18.3 million, VGA 92.4% i.e. 16.9 million VGA. 1990 has the twin Windows 3.0 and Wing Commander releases impact. Quote:
The Fall of OS/2 Bill Gates disagreed with IBM's OS/2 1.x's 16bit 286 focus and MS hired Dave Cutler (from DEC's VMS) in 1988 for the Windows NT project. Quote:
Later, IBM attempted to win gamers with PowerPC 602-based 3DO M2 (killed by Japan Inc who told Panasonic to abort the M2 project), PPE-based Xbox 360, and CELL-based PS3. IBM PowerPC A2 competed against AMD's Jaguar. Quote:
Crysis for X86-64 for Windows XP X64 with up-to-date NVIDIA GeForce X64 drivers is "game over" for Windows XP 64bit for Itanium system. OS/2 "Warp" is based on a "toy" i.e. Star Trek's Warp speed. Quote:
Later, IBM attempted to win gamers with PowerPC 602-based 3DO M2 (killed by Japan Inc who told Panasonic to abort the M2 project), PPE-based Xbox 360, and CELL-based PS3. IBM PowerPC A2 competed against AMD's Jaguar. Quote:
2. Amiga's 1985 era 3.5 Mhz 16bit blitter is easy to beat by a fast 386DX (with hardware barrel shifter). VGA has some accelerated features e.g. four lane 8bit logical operators, page flip, and a hardware scroll. VGA is not Atari ST. Quote:
https://gameworldobserver.com/2023/1...gamediscoverco Steam Deck sales could already reach 3-4 million units, with US, China, and Russia among top countries. Steam Deck has no problems beating A500's 1 million units per year pace. Last edited by hammer; 28 June 2024 at 17:12. |
||||||||||
28 June 2024, 23:42 | #5207 | |
Computer Nerd
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rotterdam/Netherlands
Age: 48
Posts: 3,852
|
Quote:
|
|
29 June 2024, 01:11 | #5208 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2023
Location: essex
Posts: 512
|
BYTE magazine calculated with blitter in A1000 is approx 50mhz 68000 performance under ideal conditions (but Lotus II ST vs Amiga FPS is 3:1 difference as best so maybe 25mhz 68000 at best).
AMDs A10 APU in a £350 PC in 2016 gave something between PS3 and PS4 gaming. Between A500/1200 vs MD/SNES and PS4 vs AMD A10 PC it was a slam dunk for PS1/PS2 vs PC for gaming due to high cost, Apple went back to overpriced rubbish by the time of Ridge Racer 4/Wipeout 3/Tomb Raider. OS/2 2.0 32bit, which is what the AREXX for Kickstart source code deal with IBM was for in the ECS/AGA transition period when Amiga BASIC was replaced. It is a multithreaded and efficient multitasking OS kernal which shits all over anything before XP/2000 from MS. If you think different you know nothing about OS quality. Next Step was OS king, next best is 0S/2 32bit v 2.0'UNIX for x86, if you didn't agree your opinion is based on fantasy so who cares. OS/2 2.0 onward runs Doom for DOS faster than MS DOS, IIRC faster than Win95 Doom. If you were a 486/Pentium gamer you should have got OS/2 just because it runs DOS games faster AND supplies a full 640k DOS RAM with no shitty Config.sys/Autoexec.bat editing bollox that made QEMM386 a very profitable DOS app sold to PC owners by Quarterdeck Any Amiga game that doesn't trash the C coded libraries and OS kernal is amateur hour wank for people who might as well have bought an ST and saved £250 in 87 lol OS is for serious work to increase the machines productive/creative software sophistication. Nobody had an answer for PS1 graphics/sound custom silicon at $300/£300, that's why all £500ish all in one style computers died off, it's not the MIPS vs SH204 CPUs of Saturn vs PS1 that was a problem. Even N64 only had ONE game remotely approaching the polygon throughput of Ridge Racer Type/4 called World Driver Championship, N64 was a smoke and mirrors post processing exercise hiding the inferior polygon throughput count with foggy blurry type effect to try and hide it, ALL N64 dev adverts mentioned "MUST BE SKILLED IN LOW POLYGON DESIGN" in EDGE magazine! After Commodore/Atari left the market and Acorn axed their all-in-one budget models your choice was down to very overpriced 1996 Mac, cheap PC with a shit OS or weirdo option of Acorn RISC PC. Once XP SP1 was out it was game over for any other rival computer format but a 3D graphics card for PC to play Need for Speed Most Wanted as well as new Xbox 360 cost as much as that console. AMD's A10 was really the only time there was a choice for games with under £500 to spend. AMD's Oberon APU they designed exclusively for Sony's PS5 did real time raytracing from day 1, a Radeon/Nvidia card for an i7 etc PC capable of that cost £1000+ lol nothing changes. How much would a PC capable of Shadow of the Beast quality audio visuals cost you in 1989? MT32 was the price of an A500 when it came out and so were the VRAM based SVGA cards that weren't even out in 89 That's the sort of advantage A1200 needed for all game genres. Knights of the Sky on A500 vs EGA Amstrad 1640 PC (£649.99) is more or less the same frame rate but with beeper sound lol |
29 June 2024, 05:34 | #5209 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,752
|
Quote:
The A1200 managed to include a 14MHz 020 for a price similar to the A500, significantly boosting the performance by using both the faster CPU and more bandwidth for blitting. The commercial CDTV multimedia title I developed loaded images twice as fast on the CD32 as on the CDTV, with no changes to the code (would have been even faster with AGA enabled and 2x speed CD). By 1994 the A500 was being pushed to limits no one thought possible, with games so good you had to look closely to tell they weren't AGA. But even that wasn't the limit. Today we have 3D almost up to Doom standard at a reasonable frame rate, and 2D using HAM mode so well you would swear it was true color. Then you run the same game on a stock A1200 and it totally blows you away. Fans who express disappointment at the A1200 not having more hardware are missing the point. Like the original A1000 it was designed to do more with less. It just needed the right attention to make it shine, without jealously comparing it to the PC (which had its own way of shining). I don't think it was reasonable to expect the Amiga (as we knew it) to make it into the 21st century. Every other home computer had limited lifespan before it became retro, and the Amiga would be no exception. That's not necessarily a bad thing. The retro PC scene lies on a continuum with no era standing out as worthy of preserving. The Amiga didn't change much between 1985 and 1994, which is a good thing both for retro enthusiasts and those of us who never stopped using it. Luckily we didn't suffer the paradigm shifts that other long-lived platforms did (except for PPC and OS4, but that was post Commodore and so can pretty much be ignored). |
|
29 June 2024, 05:40 | #5210 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,752
|
|
29 June 2024, 10:14 | #5211 |
Computer Nerd
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rotterdam/Netherlands
Age: 48
Posts: 3,852
|
|
29 June 2024, 14:06 | #5212 | ||||
AKA Mr. Rhythm Master/AIS
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: London, UK
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
Quote:
In an ideal world, Gould would not have shitcanned Tom Rattigan in 1987 and the two-pronged sales strategy begun with the A500 and B2000 would have been allowed to evolve. What a lot of folks seem to forget is that in 1987, the fact that every competitor platform effectively had performance bottlenecked by CPU was a major problem. Yes, the chipset that made the Amiga seem like it came from the future in 1985 eventually became the platform's undoing - but it needn't have panned out that way. With the A500 poised to step into the market sector previously held by the C64 as the unit price came down, the opportunity was there to get the Amiga established as an affordable home machine with unprecedented creative possibilities as well as being a capable gaming platform. Regardless of all the irritating one-upmanship and willy-waving that has plagued this thread, the simple fact is that in 1987 the only platform that enabled a home user to create an audio/visual presentation (without programming knowledge) and record the output to video tape with no extra hardware beyond a cable - and do so right out of the box - was the Amiga. And it could play games too. In the late '80s that should have been enough for any half-decent marketing department to treat as a licence to print money. The contemporary Mac couldn't do it without extra hardware; the PC compatible platform couldn't do it at all - and even the base models of both were significantly more expensive. And yes - CBM would have had to act quickly in the face of Nintendo and Sega's emphatic push into the US market in the late '80s. The A500 was more expensive than a NES or Genesis/MD (when it arrived); but the point was that it could do much more than play games at a far lower price than the competition, but when Irv threw Rattigan under the bus, CBM became rudderless and never truly recovered. With 20/20 hindsight, a sensible long-term roadmap for the platform would have leveraged the creative potential of the A500 - which at the time was unmatched in terms of "bang-for-buck". Obviously as far as the US market was concerned, trying to hold on to the low-end in the face of Nintendo and Sega's onslaught wasn't going to work past a certain point, but if the A500 could have snagged a user base early enough, as the home computer market began to shift away from trying to compete with the consoles in favour of more powerful machines, there's a chance that the younger customers who cut their teeth on the A500 would have been inclined to stick with the platform. (Of course, one rarely-acknowledged irony is that several game developers and designers who went on to become legends at Nintendo and the like actually cut their own teeth on the VIC-20...) Quote:
I think it's also worth pointing out that the Macintosh ceased to be a distinct hardware platform from the mid-2000s onwards, essentially becoming internally Wintel with a dongle on the motherboard as DRM for installing MacOS X. With the advent of the Apple M# ARM-based architecture this has changed somewhat, but if we're talking expansion and peripherals it's still more-or-less commodity PC hardware. MacOS X itself is no longer a bespoke technology so much as an (often frustrating) GUI built on top of a forked BSD Unix. Quote:
Ultimately, things happened the way they did and there's no changing that - however I couldn't help but raise a wry smile when I saw the "PC97" standard and noted that in terms of architecture it owed rather more to the Amiga design than an evolution of IBM's approach. |
||||
30 June 2024, 02:17 | #5213 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,069
|
|
30 June 2024, 02:18 | #5214 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,069
|
|
30 June 2024, 02:19 | #5215 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,069
|
|
30 June 2024, 03:00 | #5216 | ||||||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
https://powerprograms.nl/amiga/cpu-blit-assist.html A1200 Blitter at 100% A1200 CPU is 49.7% Both 68020 and 80386 has hardware barrel shifters and matching 32bit ALUs. DSP3210 has its hardware barrel shifters @ 50 Mhz and higher. High clockspeed 386 and 020/030 will beat 1985-era Blitter @ 3.5 Mhz 16-bit. 68000's IPC is crap and Amiga's Blitter was the patch. 68000 is good for hosting a 32-bit programming model OS. Wake me up when 68000 @ 7.1 MHz can reach 3.5 MIPS on 3.5 MHz memory bus. VGA is not Atari ST since VGA has its hardware accelerated features e.g. http://www.osdever.net/FreeVGA/vga/vgafx.htm Quote:
Amiga ECS's release was delayed to 1990. Amiga joined the losses camp along with late GUI comers like text-base Lotus 123, text base WordStar and text based WordPerfect. ----------- AMD's A10 APU's IGP (with 8 CU 2.0, 737.3 GFLOPS FP32) is nowhere near the Radeon HD 7850 @ 900 Mhz class GPU in the PS4's IGP (with 18 CU GCN 2.0 and 1.843 TFLOPS). Xbox One has 12 CU GCN 2.0 and 1.3 TFLOPS. Quote:
The Amiga had timed exclusives game packs. Quote:
A dose of reality for OS/2 https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=88039 Quote:
https://news.microsoft.com/1996/01/0...etail-outlets/ Quote:
In Jan 1997, GLQuake was released for Windows 95/NT. OS/2 Warp doesn't have heavy hitters like DirectX Starcraft and Diablo. My 1996-1997 selection for Windows 95 PC is mostly due to DirectX games. 3DFX Voodoo has its influence during 1996. Steam OS 3.x (based on ArchLinux) has better traction due to Valve's DirectX support with Valve-driven improvements for Proton and DXVK. OS/2 is a joke. PS; My Linux distro selection is ArchLinux. Last edited by hammer; Yesterday at 05:41. |
||||||
30 June 2024, 10:08 | #5217 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: France
Posts: 656
|
Thanks for this excellent video. So Commodore copied IBM marketing worst idea. Perhaps they had the same advisor? Quote:
|
|
30 June 2024, 23:56 | #5218 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
|
|
Yesterday, 04:48 | #5219 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Sydney/Australia
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
David Pleasance's A500 Batman pack includes a timed exclusive heavy hitter game i.e. Batman. Bill Gates' Microsoft understood the grassroots approach and applied it to Windows 95, benefiting Windows NT. http://www.bambi-amiga.co.uk/amigahi...500batman.html Quote:
[ Show youtube player ] The Rise of Microsoft Windows Part 2: Windows 2x. This video also includes IBM's "braindead 16-bit 286" focus for OS/2 1.x and resulting failure. Due to Microsoft's experience with the Apple Mac with 68K's flat memory model, Bill Gates called Intel's 80286 as "braindead". For AGA, David Pleasance's Commodore UK released game packs for A1200 and UK stands-alone. AGA Amiga install base Germany (2nd strongest Amiga AGA market): Amiga 1200 = 95,500 Amiga CD32 = 25,000 Amiga 4000/030 = 7,500 Amiga 4000/040 = 3,800 Sub-total: 131,800 CD32 wasn't popular in Germany, prefers A1200 over CD32. https://web.archive.org/web/20230726...ory/sales.html UK: Amiga 1200 (Oct - Dec 1992) = 44,000 (Amiga Format May 1993) Amiga 1200 (Jan - Aug 1993) = 100,000 (Amiga Format September 1993) Amiga 1200 (Xmas 1993) = 160,000 (Amiga Format 56 Feb 1994) Amiga CD32 (Xmas 1993) = 70,000 (Amiga Format 56 Feb 1994) Sub-total: 374,000 AGA install base from Amiga's strongest markets: 505,800. AGA only has 1993 as its full sales year. Amiga 2200 (based on CD32), https://bigbookofamigahardware.com/b...uct.aspx?id=19 65,000 CD32 motherboards assigned to Amitech's Amiga 2200 clone. This is under Commodore Canada's purchase orders. These 65,000 CD32 motherboards were locked in a Philippines warehouse by the creditors. Due to the cash flow crunch, problems in Amiga's Philippines manufacturing (blame Bill Sydnes and Mehdi Ali) and not addressing gaming PC's texture-mapped gaming (i.e. gamers leaving the Amiga for gaming PCs with fast 386DX and 486), Commodore as a group couldn't convert production into revenue at a sufficient rate. Escom has a stockpile of AGA chips and CD32 boards i.e. 100,000 in the warehouse. Commodore International reached nearly break even with a $8.2 million dollars lost in its last quarter. Commodore couldn't counter the $366 million lost for 1992-H2 to 1993-H1. David Pleasance warned against CD32's 1993 release since it has lower profit margins when compared to A1200's healthy profit margins. The difference 299 UKP CD32 x 100,000 units vs 399 UKP A1200 x 100,000 units is about 10 million UKP (about $15 million dollars / 2 to remove retail cut = about $7.5 million for Commodore) which could cover Commodore International's last quarter $8.2 million dollars lost. David Pleasance's warning is proven correct. Commodore was close to "turning the ship around". The CD32's 100,000 unit production should have been extra A1200s for Germany and UK! Last edited by hammer; Yesterday at 05:37. |
||
Yesterday, 06:35 | #5220 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hastings, New Zealand
Posts: 2,752
|
In 1981 IBM launched the PC with a series of adverts featuring 'The Tramp', a fictional character created by English comic actor Charlie Chaplin. This association with comedy film was a huge success, and IBM continued the theme for many years.
IBM's use of the name 'Warp' was no doubt inspired by the fictional warp drive used to travel faster than the speed of light in Star Trek. By 1994, when OS/2 Warp was introduced, this word was part of the popular lexicon and its meaning was well known. Thus it was an appropriate name for a new version of OS/2 that was incredibly fast and light-years ahead of what came before - or at least that's the idea IBM was trying to get across. However there another reason to use it, which was that 'Warp' was the internal name IBM used during development. In fact they had been using Star Trek terms as internal names for prior OS/2 releases too. It was very clever IMO. As each version was released they could call it Warp 3, Warp 4 etc. - getting faster each time! (not really). This didn't associate OS/2 with toys. Star Trek was a serious TV show which explored contemporary social issues including class warfare, economics, racism, religion, human rights, sexism, feminism, and the role of technology in society. One would have to be either incredibly shallow or have the mind of a 3 year old not to recognize this. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests) | |
hammer |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A1200 RF module removal pics + A1200 chips overview | eXeler0 | Hardware pics | 2 | 08 March 2017 00:09 |
Sale - 2 auctions: A1200 mobo + flickerfixer & A1200 tower case w/ kit | blakespot | MarketPlace | 0 | 27 August 2015 18:50 |
For Sale - A1200/A1000/IndiAGA MkII/A1200 Trapdoor Ram & Other Goodies! | fitzsteve | MarketPlace | 1 | 11 December 2012 10:32 |
Trading A1200 030 acc and A1200 indivision for Amiga stuff | 8bitbubsy | MarketPlace | 17 | 14 December 2009 21:50 |
Trade Mac g3 300/400 or A1200 for an A1200 accellerator | BiL0 | MarketPlace | 0 | 07 June 2006 17:41 |
|
|