English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Support > support.Hardware

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 14 June 2024, 17:01   #1
Fuzzball
Registered User
 
Fuzzball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 66
Amiga 500 Buying Advice?

When buying an Amiga 500 today, are there any things to look out for or things to avoid. Are there any preferred revisions? etc.

(and probably 101 other questions I can't think of right now)

(bear in mind I am considering putting a pistorm in it and a rgb2hdmi)

Last edited by Fuzzball; 14 June 2024 at 17:08.
Fuzzball is offline  
Old 14 June 2024, 21:17   #2
Jope
-
 
Jope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Helsinki / Finland
Age: 43
Posts: 9,906
Try to get a revision 6 machine right away. Easy to detect: if the power led can go dim, it is rev 6 or newer. If it can only be off or bright, then it is rev5 or older.
Jope is offline  
Old 14 June 2024, 22:15   #3
Liqourice
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Stockholm / Sweden
Posts: 162
I'd say rev 6a or newer as well. Rev 5 has some quirks, especially to upgrade roms, that you don't have with newer boards. Older revs I honestly don't know. Rev 6a and newer is a lot easier to upgrade chipram to at least 1MB as well.
Liqourice is online now  
Old 14 June 2024, 22:31   #4
Cylon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Europe
Posts: 475
Get a rev.8 A500, but not the A500+.
Cylon is offline  
Old 15 June 2024, 12:39   #5
Fuzzball
Registered User
 
Fuzzball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 66
Thanks everyone for the info. Are there advantages/disadvantages with the 500 plus?
Fuzzball is offline  
Old 15 June 2024, 13:19   #6
Snoopy1234
Registered User
 
Snoopy1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Australia
Age: 52
Posts: 894
I have a 500+ and I like it. The downside everyone considers is that it has a later chipset (ECS) and a later rom revision (2.04) both of which are not natively compatible with some if not many earlier games and stuff. Using a Relockick disk to boot it in rom 1.3 "Usually" fixes that but not always.

The things I like, is the A500+ can have 2MB chipram (ram that bottlenecks graphics ability and raw processing). It has 1MB standard but adding a 1MB card in the trapdoor bumps it to 2MB.
A early standard A500 can't be expanded like that without modifications to the motherboard. Only 512k fastram expansion. Modern alternatives and third party addons are a workaround.

Another advantage of the A500+ is it has "Extra Half-Bright" graphics modes on top of what the A500 has. Although not frequently implemented in most software.

The A500+ is also good to go if a self-booting Hard drive if added using Workbench 2.1 which is a nice middle of the road OS over the 2.04 rom.
Snoopy1234 is online now  
Old 15 June 2024, 13:25   #7
Fuzzball
Registered User
 
Fuzzball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 66
Thanks for that. I think I will stick to looking for an A500 for now. The reason I asked is the A500+ on Ebay seem to be in much better condition. As well as that a lot of the A500 on Ebay are listed as "Untested". Yeah right, of course it is "Untested" rather than "It doesn't work but I want the max price I can get".
Fuzzball is offline  
Old 15 June 2024, 13:56   #8
dreadnought
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ur, Atlantis
Posts: 2,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzball View Post
As well as that a lot of the A500 on Ebay are listed as "Untested". Yeah right, of course it is "Untested" rather than "It doesn't work but I want the max price I can get".
Well, it's a bit of lottery but a lot of them are genuinely untested, because they are sold by "normal" people, not Amiga hobbyists. To test an A500 you need cables, PSU, a disk - often an additional expense.
dreadnought is offline  
Old 15 June 2024, 13:59   #9
Snoopy1234
Registered User
 
Snoopy1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Australia
Age: 52
Posts: 894
A500+ also has a Real Time Clock and (dreaded) Varta battery which is prone to leakage destroying the motherboard. I wouldn't buy an untested A500+ because of that. I've replaced the battery in mine.
Snoopy1234 is online now  
Old 15 June 2024, 19:43   #10
Cylon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Europe
Posts: 475
The late A500 with Rev8 main board are the same as the A500+, but without the deadly VARTA battery.

So that's why you would chose an A500Rev8 instead of an A500+.

You'd get the 2MB AGNUS, ECS chip set.
Cylon is offline  
Old 15 June 2024, 20:29   #11
Fuzzball
Registered User
 
Fuzzball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadnought View Post
Well, it's a bit of lottery but a lot of them are genuinely untested, because they are sold by "normal" people, not Amiga hobbyists. To test an A500 you need cables, PSU, a disk - often an additional expense.
Yes the more I look into it, the more I am being put off buying one. Also I think I would always be worried about it packing in. I have a Mister FPGA which is great but I do miss the "tactile feel" of using a real Amiga. I miss the floppy drive sound, etc. The Mister just doesn't have the nostalgia factor for me.
Fuzzball is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G-sync monitor buying advice White support.WinUAE 18 27 March 2022 23:15
Buying A4000D advice wanted Djay MarketPlace 15 23 July 2011 00:38
Advice needed before buying a PSP lolafg MarketPlace 16 08 November 2010 00:23
Advice on buying a CD32 antonvaltaz support.Hardware 22 14 October 2010 22:43
Need hardware buying advice (pref'bly in the UK) sgt_chimp support.Hardware 12 04 December 2001 00:05

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:34.

Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Page generated in 0.10490 seconds with 15 queries