![]() |
![]() |
#61 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: BlackForest
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
This makes a lot sense. But also this can cause confusion.Lets say for example you like mp3 and you use as your yardstick lame (mp3 converter tool). On Aminet you can find not only many different version of lame, but also different compiled versions. I saw one compile properly done with compiler optimization turned on, and another lame compile done (probably by accident) with all optimizations turned off and with debugger enabled. Both of the lame exe look the same to the user but the not-optimize versions runs like 2 times slower. So if people report their results - they can vary by 100% for no apparent reason. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Alien Bleed
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 4,862
|
This is why you benchmark a range of applications.
Like Amiga Shopper always used to when doing accelerator reviews and roundups |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: BlackForest
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
The thing is that before you buy something, looking at benchmarks might make sense. Before I buy a car I might look at the max speed or max horse power of the differentengines options. You might even to a testdrive of two different engine options before you decide which one to buy. With computers you maybe can not easily test drive different options yourself before buying. So you rely on others doing tests. And sometimes these tests are confusing. Like for example Sysspeed. A well know Amiga benchmark. It shows for example MIPS scored of both 68K and PowerPC chips. Is this nice for comparing them? Maybe? But is "test" code run on the 68K and PowerPC actually doing the same test on each or it in reality using two complete different in independent and incompatible algorithms? So even test results that look genuine for the Amiga users - could be totally nonsense. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Norwich
Posts: 525
|
Well, yes, but that's true of any consumer test results of any computer. Unless the only reason you want to buy a computer is to run the specific benchmark they're using, it will never be better than a vague guideline about performance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
0ld0r Git
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,726
|
@ thread
Lets not bastardise MIPS please..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instru...r_second_(MIPS) Thanks. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Alien Bleed
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 4,862
|
MIPS is a pointless metric though. It's good for willy waving but not much else, except in rare architectures where most of the instructions take the same length of time. Even on the 68060 there's a big variation between the slowest operations and the fastest.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,007
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Alien Bleed
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 4,862
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |
0ld0r Git
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,726
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Motorola 68060 | Retro-mania | MarketPlace | 7 | 29 August 2020 11:30 |
68000 motorola | alex68 | support.Hardware | 84 | 23 January 2017 21:30 |
Blizzard Motorola 68060 +32MB | guru | MarketPlace | 13 | 29 August 2011 14:11 |
FS:Motorola 68060 @ 66mhz | AMIGAZ | MarketPlace | 6 | 05 April 2005 11:14 |
|
|