![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
Well, finally, here is some better news.
![]() A brief summary of what I have achieved over the last few days: Despite still having captured nothing but corrupted rubbish from Disk Block 116, I think I'm on the brink of recovering the Calc program. The closely matching data I found for Disk Block 116 in the Advantage Disk 2[a] image in TOSEC turned out to be from the English version of the Calc program. Initially, I estimated the degree of closeness of these blocks of data by noting that the next block of data on each disk differs by only four bytes. And so it has proved to be. After many, many captures from the Office Disk's Block 116 I have established the likelihood that the bulk of the replacement data I am using is correct and that there are just four bytes (the same number of discrepancies as in the next block) which do not match. ![]() I appreciate that it would still take a huge amount of effort to establish the correct data for these four bytes using a brute force method, but I can now conduct a fresh analysis of the captures I have made so far to predict them on a maximum likelihood basis, plus I may yet find a disk drive which can read that block more effectively. The Graph program on the Office disk also has a data block which closely matches Disk Block 116 (though not quite as closely as the English Calc program's), and there is also an English version of the Graph program in the Advantage Disk 2[a] image in TOSEC. This program has a five bytes discrepancy between the Portuguese and English versions both in the relevant data block and the next one, and both files are intact! ![]() I intend to do some comparisons between the Portuguese and English versions of both the Calc and Graph programs, to see if I can discover the reason for the discrepancies, which would probably enable me to establish the correct data for the four bytes in Disk Block 116 without any guesswork. ![]() Last edited by prowler; 25 June 2012 at 00:50. |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Onezay Riendfay
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portugal
Age: 46
Posts: 119
|
Is there no end to your bag of tricks? Nice work.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
I have made some more progress since then.
![]() In fact, I have just this minute completed my first iteration for the data in Disk Block 116, which I can't wait until tomorrow to try out, so I'll be firing up the emulator before I go to bed tonight! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() However, it's not fixed yet. ![]() So, now it's time to get some fresh data using a few more drives... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Onezay Riendfay
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portugal
Age: 46
Posts: 119
|
Nice work as always.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Bit Copying Bard
![]() Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Kelty, Fife, Scotland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,306
|
A necro, but with permission from prowler! Just found this software in a mangled box, buried amongst some old Amiga stuff I blagged over a decade ago
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
Thanks for resurrecting this thread, indigolemon!
![]() Disk images received with thanks. ![]() Will start comparing them with the most up-to-date disk images from this project tomorrow. ![]() Will post more news then. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sidcup, England
Posts: 10,300
|
I have found my backup copy (some 100MB!) of all the files I downloaded and generated in connection with this project, which is extremely fortunate because the original harddrive failed within weeks of my last work on it.
![]() It is taking me a while to get my head round this lot again after more than five years and that is why I had nothing to report last night. Indigolemon, the disk images you sent me may well be suitable for submission to TOSEC as they are, since you dumped them with no errors, but I have to tell you that if your disks contain the same software featured on HymnsomniaK's, then there is surprisingly little in common between the two sets of disks when compared on a block-for-block basis, so it would be wise to check the originality of every file on your disks before submitting them. The next step will be to check the discrepancies (if any) between the files on your disk set and HymnsomniaK's. I have PM'd HymnsomniaK to let him know that his thread has been resurrected, but it's been some three years since his last activity here and I have no way of contacting him by email, so I'm not sure whether he'll respond. I'll have a better idea where this project will go next when I've completed the file comparisons. |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Bit Copying Bard
![]() Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Kelty, Fife, Scotland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,306
|
Nice work prowler! I must confess to having never used this software, so I'm unsure what should be on the disks, however they are original and write protected (I assume therefore the original owner hadn't tampered with them) so would hope they are correct. Will need to see if I can get any of the software to run.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 1,444
|
Any progress after so many years?
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Amiga Room/Office :) | fitzsteve | Hardware pics | 10 | 06 June 2012 06:11 |
tosec.amiga.me (Your New TOSEC Source) is open! | Magix | News | 31 | 19 March 2009 18:03 |
Compatibility with Amiga 500 and 500+ games | ErickDF | Amiga scene | 2 | 23 May 2008 20:16 |
WTB: Amiga 600, 500, 500 +, 1200 (NTSC) | JeremyDay | MarketPlace | 2 | 30 November 2006 03:27 |
AMIGAplus 12/2004 (#153) - Amiga Office | Paul | News | 0 | 03 December 2004 17:29 |
|
|