![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Helsingborg/Sweden
Age: 44
Posts: 17
|
sas/c and netincludes (amitcp)
hey, just wondering how the includes are supposed to be set up for sas/c, i gather i'm supposed to assign to netincludes but wouldn't that cause a clash for includes that are named the same? errno.h for example. the only way i can see this work is if i edit the netincludes to point directly to it's own includes (ie instead of <sys/errno.h> it would be <netincludes:sys/errno>.
doesn't seem right needing to edit the includes this way that's why i'm wondering. can't remember this beeing an issue in the past with gcc but it's been ages since i've messed around with c and compilers. thanks. edit: did a compare and see that an overwrite of the files won't do any harm, they still carry the same information just with more added to them. thanks anyway. Last edited by frakswe; 31 December 2018 at 03:25. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UmeƄ
Age: 42
Posts: 817
|
I think you are supposed to add it as an extra include directory after the normal includes in the project setup.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
botcher
![]() Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Posts: 625
|
snip
Code:
assign sc: d:sc assign include: sc:netinclude assign include: sc:include add assign lib: sc:lib path sc:c add |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AmiTCP 4.3 | eva | request.Apps | 0 | 29 January 2015 02:53 |
x-surf100 and AMITCP | rogersyd | support.Other | 10 | 24 March 2014 23:14 |
amitcp/ip | lambrettadave | support.Hardware | 1 | 21 October 2010 17:42 |
Amitcp | Pentangle | request.Apps | 2 | 07 May 2008 10:03 |
AmiTCP | DDNI | support.Apps | 4 | 07 April 2006 13:11 |
|
|