03 December 2014, 13:23 | #21 |
BlizzardPPC'less
|
Well it works, but it looks...white
|
03 December 2014, 13:40 | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,307
|
I can confirm that the froum works/looks good with IB2.4 (image loading disabled here for faster load). However, I don`t know how it shall look. The mobile mode was very bad when I tried compared to normal mode.
|
03 January 2016, 18:55 | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 668
|
I hope someday IBrowse 2.5 or better IBrowse 3.0 sees the 68k world. Now that Vampire is availbale and fast it makes more sense What's your opinion guys?
|
04 January 2016, 15:28 | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pozarevac/Serbia
Age: 45
Posts: 16
|
There's no point to code IBrowse for m68k cpus, because they are not powerfull enough.
Javascript is painfully slow. I haven't checked html5 stuff because I sold my 060 long time ago. Anything below 060@66 is pointless. I think it's time to go with new Amigas. They are the future. Let we maintain good memories of old ones. Cheers! |
04 January 2016, 17:58 | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 668
|
Well, Vampire is a good example of a device being faster than the fastest 060/80 turbo board. I believe it's just a start. Things are going to be better from now on. So, there is still hope in 68k world.
|
04 January 2016, 21:36 | #26 |
Ruler of the Universe
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lanzarote/Spain
Posts: 6,195
|
+1. And also WinUAE could perfectly run html5 on IBrowse 68k.
|
05 January 2016, 09:44 | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pozarevac/Serbia
Age: 45
Posts: 16
|
Vampire upgrade might be extended life for m68k machines, but it's A600 upgrade.
What about A1200? Or other Amigas... I viewed some youtube compares, A1200+accelerator vs A600+Vampire. It seems like none wins. I don't think it is possible to optimise SW for Vampire. As I saw (maybe I'm wrong) it is LC040 core @150MHz. Personally, I'd love to have it for my A1200. BTW, It's NEW HARDWARE. It'll last more than any old Blizzy or Apollo. |
05 January 2016, 20:55 | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 668
|
Have you seen this one?
I'd love to see new IBrowse 2.5 running Vampire. |
06 January 2016, 08:49 | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pozarevac/Serbia
Age: 45
Posts: 16
|
Very powerfull A600.
My 060 with Mediator 1200TX+9250 did the same job in AOS3.9. Anyway, new hardware is always welcome. Price is more than affordable. |
07 January 2016, 07:39 | #30 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: RNO
Posts: 1,007
|
Quote:
EAB never worked that well with IBrowse, and that's why I didn't register here until late days, and then really started to use only after getting OWB for MorphOS I rather used other Amiga sites which did work fine with IBrowse until then. |
|
14 March 2016, 10:28 | #31 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: RNO
Posts: 1,007
|
Quote:
And adding CSS support would require a total rewrite of the rendering engine.. and would real 68k CPUs be fast enough for it? So... But anyway, GUI and feature wise IBrowse is a real gem, and luckily Odyssey on next gen systems cloned the best features of it, so browsing feels like home on new systems |
|
04 June 2017, 16:31 | #32 | |
Ruler of the Universe
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lanzarote/Spain
Posts: 6,195
|
IBrowse 2.5
Quote:
Edit: BTW, with the latest AmiSSL now it is possible to manage your Gmail account on the miggy using IBrowse. Last edited by Retrofan; 04 June 2017 at 21:25. |
|
04 June 2017, 18:42 | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 668
|
Yes, that's right. I've been testing that myself as well. Here's the proof. |
09 June 2017, 11:21 | #34 |
Guru Meditating
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: England
Posts: 2,356
|
It's a shame netsurf on 68k is still so slow even with fast 060 and rtg
|
12 June 2017, 09:07 | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 668
|
|
12 June 2017, 09:18 | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 85
|
I'm still on the Ibrowse mailinglist and from time to time it is still being used.
From what I've read 2.5 will not include any major updates like CSS and all. 2.5 will be more of a cleanup so Ibrowse is easier to port to different Amiga systems. |
12 June 2017, 11:47 | #37 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 668
|
Quote:
http://www.ibrowse-dev.net/faq.php https://twitter.com/IBrowseAmiga |
|
12 June 2017, 12:18 | #38 |
Ruler of the Universe
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lanzarote/Spain
Posts: 6,195
|
|
25 June 2017, 01:37 | #39 |
Guru Meditating
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: England
Posts: 2,356
|
This'll come out the day after phase5 guy re-releases a bunch of accelerators, and the week before Elbox ship the sharkppc...
|
25 June 2017, 02:26 | #40 |
Ruler of the Universe
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lanzarote/Spain
Posts: 6,195
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ibrowse 2.4 error | CrazyHorse | support.Apps | 24 | 20 June 2014 05:48 |
IBrowse Keyfile | Applehammer | support.Apps | 8 | 14 October 2009 21:11 |
IBrowse 2.4 | fortytwo | support.Apps | 4 | 22 July 2007 15:41 |
IBrowse 2.4 - It's almost done! | Paul | News | 12 | 23 December 2006 02:56 |
Ibrowse | narud17 | Amiga scene | 4 | 04 December 2004 20:51 |
|
|