01 October 2016, 17:52 | #1 |
AmigaLover
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 75
|
Atari ST Computer Sales and Marketshare: A Comparison
I've always been intrigued by the seemingly parallel path the Atari ST line took alongside the Amiga. The games were always similar, the fanbase migrated from the US to Europe in the late 80s/early 90s, and the price points (and even design) were comparable, and they both ceased (for the most part) near the same time as well. And Jack Tramiel.
But I've never had a good feeling for which scene was bigger overall. I performed a bit of research to check out the sales and marketshare of our friends on the Atari side. If you've ever been curious, too - thoughts welcome: https://amigalove.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=131 Cheers |
01 October 2016, 22:40 | #2 |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 9,014
|
Firstly the price points were never similar. The Atari ST was significantly cheaper during its entire lifespan.
Also they didnt cease at near the same time either, the ST ceased to commercially viable for a lot of software companies by 1992. In what way was the design similar? |
01 October 2016, 23:34 | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: South Shields
Posts: 812
|
|
02 October 2016, 05:00 | #4 |
AmigaLover
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 75
|
@Galahad I'm not really comparing the video editing bays of the 3000/4000s here. Not really the same focus from a pricing perspective when I'm making a generalized comparison. But those models also weren't very popular with the general populations.
The Atari's main selling point in much of their advertising was their cheaper price point. Meanwhile the "lower end" Amiga 500 launched in the US for US$595.95, as did the 1200. That was essentially the exact same price as the Atari 520ST. (The 1040 was more, obviously.) And yes, if you look at them objectively, the case designs of the "wedge" computers aren't that vastly different. The Atari 1040 ST and Amiga 1200, from the outside were very similar looking, let's be honest. >the ST ceased to commercially viable for a lot of software companies by 1992. Yes, and in terms of overall marketshare, the two platforms were done. It just took Commodore longer to fizzle out as they had a bit more cash reserves. The Amiga brand limped on, but only to folks that wouldn't let go, like ourselves, until 1995 (and beyond!). But it was over in the grand scheme of things. Am I making sense? I appreciate the comments. |
02 October 2016, 06:29 | #5 |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
the chart shows around 5 millions of Amigas sold and 2,2 millions of Atari computers all ranges sold.
those numbers are for world, not for USA alone. The 17 millions number of C64 sold in this chart done by Reimer is the world wide sales figures. You confirm ? |
03 October 2016, 04:36 | #6 |
AmigaLover
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 75
|
@dlfrsilver yes, that is what it looks like: worldwide sales and marketshare, not US-only. It's the whole thing for all platforms involved.
|
03 October 2016, 08:31 | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: >
Posts: 2,928
|
The most accurate Amiga figures would be on this link, probably from C; Germany for the end of 1993 which put them at 5.3m obv this doesn't take into account 94 sales and the rest of the inventory at the time plus any Escom etc sales, I guess around 5.5-6m would be closer the total.
http://www.amigahistory.plus.com/sales.html |
04 October 2016, 07:04 | #8 |
AmigaLover
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 75
|
@Amigajay that's a good point - that would indeed inch it up a bit. These figures were originally collected in 2005. I think 1993 and earlier are pretty solid since we have US 10-Q filings to compare against. But after the breakup it gets a little murkier.
Wouldn't affect marketshare at all by then, but would get the final total pretty close to the "real deal". If only C= and Atari (et al) had kept *electronic* records on, well... something more than a floppy disk in some (yes) filing cabinet before the doors were locked shut and the bulldozers came. C= almost made it to the internet era. Had they made it that far, we might actually have some records that were saved to a *server* somehwere. That sure would have been handy. :P |
05 October 2016, 09:55 | #9 |
Puttymoon inhabitant
|
What I can see from the chart is the really dramatical drop of Amiga (and Atari) between 1991 and 1992 to PCs. Is that a coincidence that Windows 3.1 were introduced in April 1992?
|
05 October 2016, 10:28 | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: >
Posts: 2,928
|
Quote:
More likely that was when Commodore were fucking up big time confusing Amiga buyers with the CDTV, A570, A500+ and A600 computers! |
|
05 October 2016, 13:31 | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northampton/UK
Posts: 528
|
Megadrive and SNES were released in this period, a lot of people left Amiga and ST for consoles.
|
11 October 2016, 12:30 | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Serbia
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
but professional software keep coming to ST well beyond mid 90s! --- What about serial numbers? If Atari/Amiga folks had something like Chipmunk for Apple http://www.chipmunk.nl/klantenservice/applemodel.html than we could figureout latest/highest serial numbers or highest number in particular years... It should not be complicated to make such web site and let people chipmunk serial numbers in it Here is explanation of Falcon serial numbers: http://www.atari-forum.com/viewtopic...=24769#p228032 Last edited by kovacm; 11 October 2016 at 12:42. |
|
11 October 2016, 13:10 | #13 | |
Going nowhere
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 50
Posts: 9,014
|
Quote:
|
|
11 October 2016, 15:18 | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Serbia
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
but it is true that with Windows 3.x starts (and finished with Windows 95) massive porting of software from Mac, Atari, Amiga and even SGI to IBM PC. Software like LightWave, Real3D, Cinema 4D, Maya, SoftImage (M$ actually bought SoftImage), ArchiCad, Tenado CAD, PhotoShop, Illustrator, PageStream, QuarkXPress, Calamus, CuBase, Logic, FreeHand, Premier, PhotoLine, PageMaker... all this softwares appear on Windows 3.x or Windows 95 so finally IBM PC could be use for something more than typewriter. |
|
11 October 2016, 15:23 | #15 |
Puttymoon inhabitant
|
Ha! What I said in #9?
|
11 October 2016, 16:00 | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: >
Posts: 2,928
|
Not really, business model Amiga's only made up <10% total of all Amiga's sold, the gaming bundles were always Commodore's biggest sellers, there is no one else to blame expect Commodore, if the AGA/AA machines were good enough they would have sold regardless of any competition, they weren't, Commodore screwed up, game over.
|
12 October 2016, 01:31 | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 4,344
|
You only need to look at the Falcon's absolutely abysmal sales to conclude that the ST was commercially dead after 1992.
|
12 October 2016, 07:34 | #18 |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
The Falcon 030 sold to only 5000 machines for all countries. That's why it's so expensive to buy these days.
|
12 October 2016, 08:25 | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: >
Posts: 2,928
|
|
12 October 2016, 11:08 | #20 |
CaptainM68K-SPS France
|
very possibly. Atari basically did an awfully job, and never had the money to promote the computer. It sold mostly in the music market niche.
The public was not interested. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My sales over next couple of weeks | emdxxxx | MarketPlace | 4 | 31 October 2007 10:17 |
Atari Legend. Finally an Atari ST database similar to HOL! | Fred the Fop | Retrogaming General Discussion | 23 | 04 December 2004 06:46 |
|
|