Quote:
Originally Posted by orangespider
nah, its just my dumb way of taking over the copper from the system for a while.
It was at 1732Hz.
|
So we should hear something like the 2kHz example in the video (at 3:39)?
Of course the difference is less prominent on less different waveforms ...
by the way I was thinking of yet another possibility:
dividing the frequencies for each channel.
so we could play lower frequencies (eg. <1kHz) with a period of 128 ticks and the higher frequency part with 64 ticks.
Additionally we could try to correct the values of the 8bit-Low frequency part with the high-fequency channel 2 times per time period ...
so it would be:
AUD0DAT 64 (right HF)
AUD1DAT 64 (left HF)
AUD2DAT 128 (left LF)
AUD3BAT 128 (right LF)
With this we could play c3 without "collapsing" on normal productivity (and without Copper feed) and we also would need 25% less sample data ...
Just a crazy thought ....