|
We're having exactly the same discussions as last time - categories and points and other restrictions. You can read the original threads to see how it went (at length!)
More productive perhaps is a review of the rules with respect to what worked and what can be improved.
The original vs reuse argument is intractable: one man's standard library is another man's egregious code reuse. That said an entry should only be judged on what was done for the competition.
|