Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dir_marillion
Hehe, great comment Commie :-)
Dlfsilver, who is R.J. ? Amiga has 22KHz - 8 bit sound which is not very near to 44KHz 16KHz CD quality. No problem if you believe that the 14bit stereo +++ in AHI is true :-)
TIP: Some sounds (low KHz sounds like electric guitars and bass) with amiga filter are nice when you listen them (especially into the games). But if you listen the 16bit editions of these sounds, in the same time, from a real CD, you can understand the difference.
The most of the small PC speakers refer 150-250 Watts. Are they true too?
Steinberg never looked Amiga because:
a. MIDI IS DIFFERENT THAN AUDIO (I am tired to writing it)
b. Companies always look the base machine and Atari had build in midi ports
c. Atari TOS was single-tasking so it had not timing errors
d. Atari had 640*400 B/W at 72KHz which it was and it is a workable resolution for a musician
e. TOS was enough and very stable to support it's developing.
Of course when Amiga had it's first Zorro-2 Audio Cards like Toccata, was too late.
Steinberg had already start developing on Mac PPCs and Pentium PCs... the next VST generation...
...and yes if Spectrum had an UltraSPARC III processor that was 64 bit, it could run Solaris 10.
|
Hehe, great comment Commie :-)
Dlfsilver, who is R.J. ? Amiga has 22KHz - 8 bit sound which is not very near to 44KHz 16KHz CD quality. No problem if you believe that the 14bit stereo +++ in AHI is true :-)
- Nahh how do you mean to be serious here
you don't know RJ ?
RJ stands for Richard Joseph, a brilliant professional musician working in the
video game industry, who was the bitmap brothers Musical weapon.
Does it switch your light on ? Just for you to know, in shadow of the beast
"the instruments used in the music were generated with a Korg M1 synthesiser and then sampled at over 20 khz, which gives the music a higher quality than what is normally found in computer games."
It means that with midi system tied up with a single amiga, you get a far better result when composing.
I have myself recorded from a standard CD player... you'll be mad to hear
the result. the amiga has the best sound system ever created for a home
machine. When i played the sampled music i have recorded, people of my
family were impressed what they saw in front of their eyes and heard.
TIP: Some sounds (low KHz sounds like electric guitars and bass) with amiga filter are nice when you listen them (especially into the games). But if you listen the 16bit editions of these sounds, in the same time, from a real CD, you can understand the difference.
Once again, there's a small difference between
original pieces and amiga music. Gods song, and chaos engine are
an example, and the best of course, just ask C.Huelsbeck just how
you can go when composing with an amiga. the apidya soundtrack
was driven when playing by an amiga machine, it's written in the CD booklet. Here again, we all know how much C.Huelsbeck is a sound GOD.
The most of the small PC speakers refer 150-250 Watts. Are they true too?
Steinberg never looked Amiga because:
a. MIDI IS DIFFERENT THAN AUDIO (I am tired to writing it)
Midi is used for recording music, please don't play on words
b. Companies always look the base machine and Atari had build in midi ports
c. Atari TOS was single-tasking so it had not timing errors
False affirmation. The amiga was used by the NASA because it doesn't
have ANY TIMING ERRORS. Aerospatial operation does not SUPPORT
OTHER machine like these because NO ERRORS are allowed when
launched.
d. Atari had 640*400 B/W at 72KHz which it was and it is a workable resolution for a musician
e. TOS was enough and very stable to support it's developing.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dir_marillion
Once again, it's a free affirmation. The amiga doesn't
have to prove it's stable. The tos has the same compatibility problem
has the lastest WB has. WHDLOAD is here to correct this, in some ways ^^
Of course when Amiga had it's first Zorro-2 Audio Cards like Toccata, was too late.
Once again, C.Huelsbeck would not agree with you. Amiga is compatible
with a lot of instruments and other material used when recording.
Steinberg had already start developing on Mac PPCs and Pentium PCs... the next VST generation...
Arfff, nothing to brag out here....
...and yes if Spectrum had an UltraSPARC III processor that was 64 bit, it could run Solaris 10. |