Quote:
Originally Posted by saimo
I have the impression you formed the idea that I want to get things done without caring about quality and without making the effort to understand.
|
No,
you suggested that the ROM code was not high quality, which implies you think that you can do better.
Quote:
|
Did you find anything in my code that is so bad to suggest that it's likely that its quality is worse than that of unknown code?
|
I don't need to find anything, we
know your code's not good because it doesn't work.
Quote:
|
Note: I'm not implying neither I implied before that the nonvolatile.library code is necessarily bad or that my code is better.
|
You questioned the ROM code's quality and speculated that it could be a 'weird hack'. That's more than just implication.
Quote:
|
I only said that I prefer a clean-room implementation tailored to my (strict) needs and based on the EEPROM documentation.
|
That's fine, try to reinvent the wheel if it pleases you. But 'clean-room implementation' on a 25 year old OS for a dead platform? Go on, take peek! Nobody will care if you do.