Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dlfrsilver
I own an atari 1040 STFM, and the point to me is that when you say atari
can drive MIDI and amiga doesn't have anything to be as good, i just can argue to say no. I don't see the point about fighting, as atari would have never win anyway.
the falcon has on the paper delicious specs, but if you take an amiga configuration
matching the falcon is terms of processor/Memory/sound system, the falcon is deadly beaten.....
the A1200 can bear up to 256 mb of memory, can use any HDD disks with PFS system
installed, on A1230, the 68030 is running at 50 mhz and has a FPU running at 50 Mhz too.
also, don't forget that the 68030 has mainly here only some more instructions, that's all, compared with a 68020.
|
Read above, find the link I gave to Keropi, Atari Falcon has the fastest 060 accelerator ever !!! 200 mips and takes Dimms up to a total of 512MB, faster than any Amiga 68k Accelerator !!! Has also DSP that Amiga never had.!!! DSP is 16 Mips at the main (like Amiga4000/040-25 at sysinfo), working parallel with it's build-in 030 and could be used for graphics and 16 bit music realtime compressions/decompressions/fills etc ... and has VGA build-in connector for monitor that no Amiga had and ... and ... so please stop comparing the specs between them!!!
And I can assure you that Falcon has a high density Flopppy, as I have a falcon since 1994 !