Quote:
Originally Posted by rhester72
Thank you! I wonder how that occurred...the output I get from disk-analyse looks as follows:
Code:
$ disk-analyse -f "Amnios Disk 1" AmniosNTSC_Disk1 AmniosNTSC_Disk1.ipf
T0.0: AmigaDOS
T0.1: PROTEC
T1.0-77.0: Psygnosis A
T77.1-83.1: Unformatted
which shows the track as recognized and encoded, but the result is absolutely different from yours.
How did you perform the correct encoding?
By the way, thank you all for the correction - I've removed the bad IPFs from The Zone. |
How is the disk-analyse output differing? The only difference I can see is a small difference in track length (110000 bits vs 111000 bits) either of which is plenty more than the minimum length accepted by normal PROTEC.
Apart from this they look pretty identical to me!