Quote:
Originally Posted by jbl007
Couldn't wait to try it. ![Wink](images/smilies/wink.gif) Tested direct mode only. Raw cpu speed is ~7% faster than original jit according "cpuspeed" benchmark. "Long" reads/writes are 1.5x-2x faster while "Byte"/"Word" are a litte slower. Haven't had a single crash. Looks very promising. ![Great !](images/smilies/great.gif)
|
Thanks for testing
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
(More updated JIT code is now available in the *future* branch. The JIT updates have also been merged into WinUAE)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbl007
Can it work for 68000 cpu also?
|
JIT is explicitly unavailable for 68000. I'm not familiar with all the reasons. One reason can be due to minor CPU differences. Another can be that it is considered pointless, since you often want accurate-ish emulation when using 68000, and JIT will not give any kind of accurate CPU-chipset synchronization... (In any case, I don't plan to do anything about it).
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernd roesch
if it not work, you can set breakpoints in debugger at functions
|
I know, I have had to resort to this several times (latest occurrence yesterday evening)