English Amiga Board    


Go Back   English Amiga Board > » Support > support.Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05 January 2012, 18:12   #1
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
Apollo Upgrade Question

Hello,

I have an Apollo 1240 card I want to upgrade to an 060. My card has a socketed Mach130 chip. I found on ebay these for sale:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=380327751213

Can I simply replace this chip to make my card upgradeable to the 68060?

Thank you for any advice.
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 January 2012, 18:16   #2
Peter
Unemployed & Lovin' it
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Garden of England
Age: 44
Posts: 2,493
I don't think it is possible to upgrade a board that contains the mach 130.
Peter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 January 2012, 18:29   #3
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
Hmm.. not the answer I wanted, but thanks.
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 January 2012, 18:37   #4
cpiac64
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 550
the link is for a new not programmed mach131, if you find the soft for his, then can update your board
cpiac64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 January 2012, 18:47   #5
Peter
Unemployed & Lovin' it
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Garden of England
Age: 44
Posts: 2,493
PM stachu100 - he will give you a definite answer and possibly all the information you need.

He upgraded both my Apollo Boards and did a fantastic job on both.
Peter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 January 2012, 20:12   #6
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
nope your card cant be converted to a 1260 theres no mach 131 on board, and nope that mach 131 thats on ebay is a blank and no-one has the code for it apart from jens sconfeld.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 January 2012, 23:32   #7
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
Please excuse me if this is a stupid question, but why is it impossible if someone (Jens Sconfeld) has the code?
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05 January 2012, 23:50   #8
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
Please excuse me if this is a stupid question, but why is it impossible if someone (Jens Sconfeld) has the code?



because jens has the copyright to the card, and the contents of the mach chip's codes.and would probably be not willing to share them with anyone which is understandable.(you cant read them anyway they are read protected even if you had the hardware to do so)

and no its not a stupid question at all.(some peaple even wish they could buy the mach chips pre-programmed from jens)
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 00:04   #9
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
I have a lot of catching up to do. Been out of the loop a number of years... One more dumb question if I may.

Jens owns the copyright but won't sell copies?
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 01:03   #10
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
I have a lot of catching up to do. Been out of the loop a number of years... One more dumb question if I may.

Jens owns the copyright but won't sell copies?


he might sell you the pre-programmed mach131 part,try to ask thats all i can say/tell you that way you will know for sure.but he will not sell you the code just to be clear and nor would i IF i had it.


send him a email asking for the part and see if he reply's


no its not a silly question at all.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 01:55   #11
Amigafanboi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fareham Hampshire
Age: 43
Posts: 142
Jens will not sell the programmed Mach131.

He's happy if the Apollos phase out.

Best bet is to advertise on here or Amibay for a Mach131 from a faulty card or PM Stachu100, he may have one.
__________________
E=MC68060²
Amigafanboi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 02:15   #12
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amigafanboi View Post
Jens will not sell the programmed Mach131.

He's happy if the Apollos phase out.
Phased out in favor of what....?
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 02:27   #13
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
Phased out in favor of what....?


sorry.....i really am.

in favour of seeing the apollo range dissapaer from the face of the planet,sorry everyone but thats what i heard.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 02:33   #14
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
No, I'm sorry. It just seems silly. The Amiga is already a limited market. Whats the point in fracturing it further? I don't get it..
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 02:38   #15
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
No, I'm sorry. It just seems silly. The Amiga is already a limited market. Whats the point in fracturing it further? I don't get it..




neither do we,to be honest lots of peaple have said this already including me,from my point of view whats the point of buying the rights to a card and discontinuing it.pointless but there you go.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 02:47   #16
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
Thanks for the info. Man, thats a bummer... <shrug> Anyone want to buy an Apollo 1240?
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 10:12   #17
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
Thanks for the info. Man, thats a bummer... <shrug> Anyone want to buy an Apollo 1240?


put an ad on eab or amibay,thats if you really want to sell it.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 20:58   #18
Amigafanboi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fareham Hampshire
Age: 43
Posts: 142
Jens has said time and time again how he dislikes the apollos design, especially the 600 accelerators.

Why not let them phase out when he produces new accelerators for Amigas?

Personaly i'm a great fan of Apollos, they are blisteringly fast.
__________________
E=MC68060²
Amigafanboi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 21:53   #19
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amigafanboi View Post
Jens has said time and time again how he dislikes the apollos design, especially the 600 accelerators.

Why not let them phase out when he produces new accelerators for Amigas?

Personaly i'm a great fan of Apollos, they are blisteringly fast.


yes,which brings us back to the first question.why on earth would he buy the rights to it,if he dont want it.it just dont make any sense,so he can what?stop anyone else from making them?sorry it still dont make no sense even coming from a business man,theres no competition for god's sake even if he dident like the card's disign that makes even less sense to me.its not like the aca1230 are any better?!?faster? more memory? with a fpu?
i dont think jens is a god,just a man that likes praise for his work when loads of peaple said the apollo's where crap compared to the blizzards i beleive he took it hard and this may be revenge on some sort of level or other,pure speculation i might add.
i think the days are gone when there was a phase 5 to compete withor any other company for that matter.
infact if we went back over ten years and this aca1230 card was on the market it would be "lower end" theres still peaple out there that want an 040 and 060 based card,you just dont want to make one yourself. stopping everyone else because "you"worked on it is unfair.theres nothing wrong with the aca1230"if" it's what you "want"but then agian theres no other "choice" is there?

or even the one where theres going to be cheap apollo's made in china,hmmm ok

i dont think jens hates the card at all.if one breaks down a "hole" in the market opens up for a new card.

or maybe thats the impression where being given.who knows.

Last edited by roy bates; 06 January 2012 at 22:08.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 22:08   #20
Peter
Unemployed & Lovin' it
 
Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Garden of England
Age: 44
Posts: 2,493
I would keep the Apollo 1240 - it's still a great card and a piece of Amiga history really... you don't really get much for them on the 2nd hand market either to be honest. I really enjoy using my A1200 that has the 1240 in it.
Peter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06 January 2012, 22:11   #21
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter View Post
I would keep the Apollo 1240 - it's still a great card and a piece of Amiga history really... you don't really get much for them on the 2nd hand market either to be honest. I really enjoy using my A1200 that has the 1240 in it.

yes there still a very capable card.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 08:16   #22
8bitbubsy
ProTracker Nerd
 
8bitbubsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Norway
Age: 23
Posts: 1,124
Send a message via MSN to 8bitbubsy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amigafanboi View Post
Jens has said time and time again how he dislikes the apollos design, especially the 600 accelerators.

Why not let them phase out when he produces new accelerators for Amigas?

Personaly i'm a great fan of Apollos, they are blisteringly fast.
Because 060s are beasts in comparison to the 030 accs Jens is designing (even though his 030 accs are very good because of the very fast RAM access).

Regarding the Mach-apollo-source-code thing:
A lot of us wants to upgrade our Apollos 040 with Mach130... The "let this acc and its fanbase die" thing is beyond silly, what could possibly go wrong if he released the source? He could have a note saying "This design is bad, if you dare build upon it, you're a fool", this would actually make a lot of Amiga fans happy so they could not only upgrade their Mach130-Apollos, but also make changes to it!
Maybe I have a wicked view on this case, but isn't this kind of .. egoistic from Jens? What does he fear? That the Chinese market will produce bad design Amiga accelerators?
__________________
Amiga 4000 rev B [040 25MHz - 16MB fast RAM - 2MB chip RAM - kick 3.1 - Picasso IV]
Amiga 2000 rev 4.2 [030 25MHz - 8MB fast RAM - 2MB chip RAM - kick 3.1 - Picasso II]
Amiga 1200 rev 2B [030 50MHz - 16MB fast RAM - 2MB chip RAM - kick 3.1]

Last edited by 8bitbubsy; 07 January 2012 at 08:29.
8bitbubsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 11:43   #23
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8bitbubsy View Post
Because 060s are beasts in comparison to the 030 accs Jens is designing (even though his 030 accs are very good because of the very fast RAM access).

Regarding the Mach-apollo-source-code thing:
A lot of us wants to upgrade our Apollos 040 with Mach130... The "let this acc and its fanbase die" thing is beyond silly, what could possibly go wrong if he released the source? He could have a note saying "This design is bad, if you dare build upon it, you're a fool", this would actually make a lot of Amiga fans happy so they could not only upgrade their Mach130-Apollos, but also make changes to it!
Maybe I have a wicked view on this case, but isn't this kind of .. egoistic from Jens? What does he fear? That the Chinese market will produce bad design Amiga accelerators?




very true,as for the chinise thing its insanity who cares if the chinese make a cheap version. infact alot of electronics comes from china anyway.
years ago it was the blizzards compared to the apollo's he should be proud of the work he did on the apollo's ok the disign wasent perfect,but neather was the blizzard's ive heard peaple say the apollo 060 cards where based on 040 cards,they where all based on the 040 cards apart from maybe one or two the only thing that let the apollo1230/040/060 cards down was how much fastram they could have on board.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 16:38   #24
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
From a relative outsider's perspective, having been away from the Amiga market for several years, the rub on this topic is:

What is the point of owning a copyright and refusing to sell copies? That, imho, is kinda crazy.

Isn't the purpose of a coyright to protect intellectual property so as to make money? If not money, then the motive must be personal.

Last edited by moxavius; 07 January 2012 at 17:08.
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 17:23   #25
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
I found this site and there are links to download Apollo ROM images. I'm guessing these are not the files in question?

http://amigaromarchives.limewebs.com/
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 17:25   #26
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
From a relative outsider's perspective, having been away from the Amiga market for several years, the rub on this topic is:

What is the point of owning a copyright and refusing to sell copies? That, imho, is kinda crazy.

Isn't the purpose of a coyright to protect intellectual property so as to make money? If not money, then the motive must be personal.


exactly.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 17:27   #27
8bitbubsy
ProTracker Nerd
 
8bitbubsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Norway
Age: 23
Posts: 1,124
Send a message via MSN to 8bitbubsy
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
I found this site and there are links to download Apollo ROM images. I'm guessing these are not the files in question?

http://amigaromarchives.limewebs.com/
These are the boot ROMs, not the Mech130/131 codes. Sorry, but it's a completely different thing.
__________________
Amiga 4000 rev B [040 25MHz - 16MB fast RAM - 2MB chip RAM - kick 3.1 - Picasso IV]
Amiga 2000 rev 4.2 [030 25MHz - 8MB fast RAM - 2MB chip RAM - kick 3.1 - Picasso II]
Amiga 1200 rev 2B [030 50MHz - 16MB fast RAM - 2MB chip RAM - kick 3.1]
8bitbubsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 17:56   #28
Leffmann
Leffmann with two n's
 
Leffmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8bitbubsy View Post
Regarding the Mach-apollo-source-code thing:
A lot of us wants to upgrade our Apollos 040 with Mach130... The "let this acc and its fanbase die" thing is beyond silly, what could possibly go wrong if he released the source? He could have a note saying "This design is bad, if you dare build upon it, you're a fool", this would actually make a lot of Amiga fans happy so they could not only upgrade their Mach130-Apollos, but also make changes to it!
Maybe I have a wicked view on this case, but isn't this kind of .. egoistic from Jens? What does he fear? That the Chinese market will produce bad design Amiga accelerators?
It's about money.

If Jens Schoenfeld can make all Apollo and Blizzard accelerators vanish from the face of the earth then there will be a demand, and he can manufacture and sell more products. Why do you think there are Catweasel I through XVI instead of just one really good board that does everything? None of it is cutting edge. Don't be surprised if there will be an ACA 1232, 1233, 1240, 1241 and so on. More boards with incremental features means more sales and more profit. He's not as much an Amiga fan as he is a businessman, and as such his priority will always be to make profit.
Leffmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 18:11   #29
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
You're probably right about that. He's creating an artificial shortage. <sigh> I'm starting to remember why I left the Amiga community the last time....

Maybe he's trying to make Apollo and Blizzard cards disappear from the face of the earth, but in doing so, what if he makes Amiga users also disappear from the face of the earth?
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 19:32   #30
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leffmann View Post
It's about money.

If Jens Schoenfeld can make all Apollo and Blizzard accelerators vanish from the face of the earth then there will be a demand, and he can manufacture and sell more products. Why do you think there are Catweasel I through XVI instead of just one really good board that does everything? None of it is cutting edge. Don't be surprised if there will be an ACA 1232, 1233, 1240, 1241 and so on. More boards with incremental features means more sales and more profit. He's not as much an Amiga fan as he is a businessman, and as such his priority will always be to make profit.


to be honest i for one think jens should put away his "business head" and put his "enginering head" back on.


all this oh dear ive just got to "refine this product" and make sure its perfect for the community,sound's more like: if i hold on to it for a bit longer it gurantees 100% sales of all items in stock
strange how it happens "every" time isent it?
but ofF course it's just pure speculation on my part.


as for the comment about hopeing that all apollo's dissapaer from the face of the planet,well lets put it this way:everytime a peice of hardware dies its not necessarily a card. its amiga's dieing. the market gets smaller not not larger!,when was the last time an amiga was manufactured?.
or maybe thats why he wont make any of the high end cards.
or maybe because he just cant be bothered,at the end of the day we would probably get it ten years after we wanted it in the first place.

for instance not about jens this is just genaral chit chat, we asked for a 3D graphics card for zorro based amigas,we got after r and d and manufacture from phase 5 sometime down the line the virge based card CV64-3D ok it was a nice card but daaaamn it was expensive,you dont agree ?i hear you say,well........the card it was based on you could get for a pc compatible was 25 gb pounds at the time i think and the cv64-3d was 180 gb pounds and was years too late and fitted with slower memory.
and im sure everyone would be able to get one for around 100 pounds.

even harddrives where less expensive in any other system but the amiga its not like they where "different" drives so called tested for amiga drives it was shipped with a floppy to prep it and partition it."yourself"but still i was more than happy to do this for a massive 428 mb drive its always been the same,i wouldent leave the amiga scene. i just wish peaple would realise it wont be around forever.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 21:53   #31
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
I for one would love to see a new high-end accelerator card for the Amiga. I'd buy two - one to use and another as a speculative investment to sell on ebay in five years for 10x times its actual value. lol.
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07 January 2012, 22:09   #32
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
I for one would love to see a new high-end accelerator card for the Amiga. I'd buy two - one to use and another as a speculative investment to sell on ebay in five years for 10x times its actual value. lol.


funny you saying that,strange really that peaple would rather buy one to stick in a box for ten years,even peaple that join eab for info on how to fix there cards so they can sell them on ebay for max profit(no this does happen)even if it suck's ball's to be them seriusly
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 January 2012, 12:47   #33
daxb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 566
Has anyone asked Jens about that? I may wrong but as fas I can remember he bought the design and after that he noticed that he would get in service trouble if he build the cards because of bad design. So, speculate doesn`t help.

About dying Amiga hardware. Sooner or later it happen. Some more or less good alternatives exists.
daxb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 January 2012, 13:52   #34
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by daxb View Post
Has anyone asked Jens about that? I may wrong but as fas I can remember he bought the design and after that he noticed that he would get in service trouble if he build the cards because of bad design. So, speculate doesn`t help.

About dying Amiga hardware. Sooner or later it happen. Some more or less good alternatives exists.


hmm ok,its a bad idea to speculate anything.

and lets think about that for a second, he noticed design flaws that where already there?,dident he help design the card in the first place while it was in production for how many years?

ok to re-cap the card was in production for years yes?then he bought the rights to the card he had already worked on while it was in production,is that right?. sudenly decided,oh my god its got flaws lets stop making them for fear of comeback from the bad ones,im sorry but it just dont add up.


i dont dislike the guy at all.its just that sometimes some things just dont add up.after all having an opinion is my right as is anyone else on the planet.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 January 2012, 14:32   #35
moxavius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St. Louis/US
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by daxb View Post
Has anyone asked Jens about that?
I did ask and got the following response this morning:

I do not support Apollo cards. I've bought the rights in order to get the cards off the market. Apollo cards are instable by design. The components used - especially the MACH chips - are operated way out of specification and can therefore never work reliably.

I have found that Amiga users with Apollo cards lose their interest in the computer, because an unstable machine is no fun to work with. In the long run, Apollo owners abandon the "hobby Amiga", so essentially, I lose them as a potential customer.

I am therefore happy for every Apollo card that is taken off the market. I'll do my best to provide appropriate replacement products.

ciao,
--
Jens Schönfeld


Could this mean we might see a new 1260 card as an "approprite replacement"?

Last edited by Graham Humphrey; 08 January 2012 at 21:14. Reason: Back-to-back posts merged
moxavius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08 January 2012, 16:05   #36
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
Could this mean we might see a new 1260 card as an "approprite replacement"?


i for one hope so.(yes you read that right)

i used a few apollo models for years with no problems(i still use two).and i would buy one from jens.if it had support for 128mb of ram.(which for me was the ONLY downfall of owning one of these)

i dont/dident expect support so many years down the line for any apollo,im just suprised there isent a replacement for this range in the 040-060 region.(i dont care if theres no scsi support but it has to have a mmu and fpu on board)

Last edited by roy bates; 08 January 2012 at 16:14.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 January 2012, 11:39   #37
daxb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 566
So, I was also wrong. However, I use an Apollo 1240 with nearly no disaffection. The RAM limit of 32/64 MB is a problem. At least for me if I would buy a new one it should has as much as possible (1-2 GB will be fine). But that is just a taste thing and what you want to do with it.
daxb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 January 2012, 12:00   #38
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
maybe with support for pc100-133 dimms or so-dimms that are in laptops to cut the price down a bit.

but then again we probably wont see it anytime soon,oh well its just a shame really.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 January 2012, 13:49   #39
JimmySage
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by moxavius View Post
Could this mean we might see a new 1260 card as an "approprite replacement"?
I'd be happy to transfer the 060 from my Apollo if Jens could sell a better board.
I'd pay £200 for a board without CPU if it could take some modern RAM and have an expansion port for future products (decent IDE/SATA interface for example).

The only real problem I get with the Apollo is that my idefix-express dongle won't work with it (great with my 1230XA). Never been able to get to the cause of it
JimmySage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09 January 2012, 14:35   #40
roy bates
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: birmingham
Age: 44
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmySage View Post
I'd be happy to transfer the 060 from my Apollo if Jens could sell a better board.
I'd pay £200 for a board without CPU if it could take some modern RAM and have an expansion port for future products (decent IDE/SATA interface for example).

The only real problem I get with the Apollo is that my idefix-express dongle won't work with it (great with my 1230XA). Never been able to get to the cause of it



the problem is i really think no-would be able make a card like this for such a low price i think 3-400 would be more the asking for it.

in comparison a 030 card at 50mhz is about 150 gb pounds and thats cheap.
roy bates is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrade Card Question? h0ffman support.Hardware 2 14 December 2010 14:38
Wanted: Apollo 1240 060 upgrade kit 8bitbubsy MarketPlace 1 16 January 2010 15:07
Serious Apollo 1240 Upgrade Pron Dimlow Hardware mods 54 15 June 2009 18:58
Help making a choice needed apollo or Blizz upgrade? DoogUK support.Hardware 2 16 February 2009 13:12
Apollo 1220 - instructions and 68020 to 68030 upgrade fc.studio support.Hardware 11 10 January 2008 20:30


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:11.

-->

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.51765 seconds with 9 queries