![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Alien Breeder
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 276
|
Citadel: WHDload
Here's another game that I've tried various versions of, but have yet to get it to run on either my modified A600 or A1200 via WHDload.
Anyone ever have any success getting it to run? I used to love playing this on my old 500, even if I did have to size down the screen and turn most the graphical details off. Would be great to play this again now that I have the hardware to handle it in it's full Wolfenstein-esque glory. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Zone Friend
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gargore
Age: 42
Posts: 17,789
|
There is remake of this game for Windows. Game is too slow on A500, A600, speed was not acceptable even in Amiga times.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Devon, U.K.
Posts: 524
|
I read somewhere that using an older version of WHDload may work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Alien Breeder
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 276
|
I heard there was a Windows port, but I have an 060 and 030 that are just dying to give this a go! Things just are not as fun when done in Windows...
....I wonder why that is? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Unregistered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tasmania
Age: 41
Posts: 879
|
060 should give you some pretty decent fullscreen action. I seem to recall I tried this one's WHDLoad install (from KG's pack) shortly after getting my first 030 and it worked ok for me.
Anyway, have you tried all the usual WHDLoad arguments such as NOVBRMOVE, etc.? |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Posts: 161
|
Hi Guys, just recently on PPA forum, we've found out that WHDLoad version of Citadel works signifficantly slower (less FPS) than the standard one.
User nostrum666 made comparison videos on his Amiga 1200 equipped with ACA1221 card: Standard: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Aip...LjaVwAexj/view WHDLoad: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Am5...HM8B7kEfc/view He's using WHDLoad 18.2 and made sure nothing suspicious (like NoCache) is set in WHDLoad Citadel's icon tooltypes, nor WHDLoad.prefs. The installer itself is quite old, dated 2012, though: http://www.whdload.de/games/Citadel.html Any clue why there's so dramatic difference in performance? |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: near Vienna/Austria
Posts: 372
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Korzonek
Posts: 1
|
No, I hadn't. I'll try it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Posts: 161
|
Apparently "cache" in the tooltype made no difference, from what I got to know.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Freak
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Gladbeck
Age: 46
Posts: 563
|
Yes, i know, the speed of this game as WHDLoad installed is slow. Maybe open a report on Mantis Bug Tracker?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Posts: 161
|
I see someone created Citadela report already, but the description really confuses me:
http://mantis.whdload.de/view.php?id=4654 There's no problem to run WHDLoad version of Citadela on 68000 or 68020, there's problem it runs visibly slow on 68020+ when compared with running it from diskettes. I don't have account there, but could someone please add a comment in Mantis about the issue we're talking here, please? Last edited by Jacques; 14 May 2020 at 08:35. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 43
Posts: 3,943
|
Tried real disks yesterday on my Amiga 1200 Vampire (!).
It´s still slow as hell. Must be something else imo... |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Posts: 161
|
But it's even slower on WhdLoad then, I think, as 2 users reported same issue (+videos above).
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,391
|
I have an ACA1233n-40 for my Amiga 1200 and I also think the game should be a lot quicker with that accelerator card. I thought it was perhaps because I was used to playing the windows version. I love the game but cannot play it at that speed. Have not tried this "cache" in tool types. How should I try this to see it makes any difference for me?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poland
Posts: 1,283
|
HD installer for Citadel/Cytadela exists so You should try this version.
But i know it's not as easy in use as WHDLoad version and may have problems with working on better configs. But it's true that WHDLoad version should be fixed. I suppose this version is too much degraded to use better configs. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,391
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,391
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wrocław, Poland
Posts: 161
|
Two Guys from PPA forum tried it, but it made no difference. Isn't "Cache" active by default anyway and only "NoCache" disables it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,391
|
I dunno, I'm just keen to try anythin to improve the game on my actual Amiga. Do I need the disks then to do a hd install?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poland
Posts: 1,283
|
Isn't available pre-installed version on Grandis?
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Citadel | utri007 | project.WHDLoad | 12 | 08 November 2012 23:41 |
Citadel with latest WHDload 17.0 | XDelusion | project.WHDLoad | 2 | 23 October 2011 16:08 |
Citadel AGA | Retro-Nerd | request.Old Rare Games | 12 | 06 March 2011 22:41 |
Citadel | Khyron | Coders. General | 4 | 06 December 2010 17:37 |
The Citadel Gamemap | mai | HOL contributions | 2 | 15 September 2008 15:38 |
|
|