English Amiga Board


Go Back   English Amiga Board > Main > Retrogaming General Discussion

View Poll Results: Why did the CD32 fail?
It was too late for Commodore and/or the Amiga 36 29.51%
No cd-rom promptly available for A1200 4 3.28%
No SX-1/SX-32 type expansion promptly available 1 0.82%
Low quality "exclusive" software 22 18.03%
Low quantity software 7 5.74%
Poor Commodore marketing 32 26.23%
It was a success. Stupid poll. 2 1.64%
Microsoft conspiracy 5 4.10%
Low quality bundled joypad 0 0%
No room in existing console market 5 4.10%
Bad press reviews 0 0%
No Full Motion Video support/availability 0 0%
Because people thought it was "another CDTV" 5 4.10%
Bad looks 3 2.46%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 30 April 2005, 18:22   #1
wanderer
I want an A1000

wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pac-Land
Posts: 654
Why did the CD32 fail?

Why?
wanderer is offline  
AdSense AdSense  
Old 30 April 2005, 19:19   #2
CodyJarrett
Global Moderator

CodyJarrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Age: 40
Posts: 5,743
Where's the option for "Nearly all of the above"?
CodyJarrett is offline  
Old 30 April 2005, 19:37   #3
wanderer
I want an A1000

wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pac-Land
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by CodyJarrett
Where's the option for "Nearly all of the above"?
True, but let's stick to the "closest match" answer. I could have enabled "allow multiple voting" but it would be a mess, since most of the answers are vaild.

Last edited by wanderer; 30 April 2005 at 19:51.
wanderer is offline  
Old 01 May 2005, 04:25   #4
icewizard2k5
Junior Member
icewizard2k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 31
Posts: 200
shouldnt of made it a poll

who ever gave a crap about "no full motion video"?

besides the fact that its ugly what did the cd32 really offer? nothing.
it was just another amiga with the same games.

imo i think its failure was just linked to being part of Commodore's Amiga story.
icewizard2k5 is offline  
Old 01 May 2005, 06:29   #5
Miggy2TheMax
Junior Member

Miggy2TheMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Age: 39
Posts: 374
anything that you can ship out earlier the better and with the CD32 it was all too little too late. so I put down "too late for commodore...." But now that I look at the results their crappy marketing was a big player too... geezz so many options to choose from.. where to start
Miggy2TheMax is offline  
Old 01 May 2005, 07:52   #6
Rebel-CD32
Amiga will never die!
Rebel-CD32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 516
Send a message via MSN to Rebel-CD32
The main reason was the lack of CD32 exclusive games. Only a few games came out on the CD32 ONLY. From memory, these were Microcosm and Flink, maybe a few others. Later on, a few Amiga CD games came out that worked on any AGA CD system.

The rest of the games were straight A500/A1200 ports with no enhancements other than the occasional CD music or animated intro, many of them were still ECS and ran in a framed screen, the CD32 could easily handle full 320x256 screen modes with any type of game, no need to stick to smaller screens because the A500 couldn't handle bigger.

One of the better games ported from the Amiga to the CD32 was Ultimate Body Blows... at least we got the AGA graphics, CD music, and ALL of the characters and backgrounds from two big fighting games mashed up into one. That was good value compared to some of the other Amiga-CD32 games. They could have at least added a jump button to all these A500 platformers that came out on the CD32, instead of sticking to the "up is jump" for one-button A500 joysticks. A jump (or accelerate) button is much easier on a pad than pressing up.

If you read through the old magazines from 93-95, a LOT of games were planned to be released on the CD32 that made use of the CD format, AGA graphics, Akiko chip and seven-button controllers, but alas, they never saw the light of day.

Commodore's marketing wasn't too bad, they did advertise it well in Europe when it first came out, with that cool TV ad with the robot, and the big billboard outside Sega HQ, full-page ads in video game magazines and stuff. It was just the lack of special games that stopped people from buying it, and therefor developing for it.
Rebel-CD32 is offline  
Old 01 May 2005, 11:26   #7
StarEye
Zone Friend
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Norway
Age: 40
Posts: 985
Expensive, ugly, useless, and generally a bad machine. The games they had were already on the amiga, and about only 0,1% of the games were exclusive to the CD32 vs the normal Amiga. Microcosm? Flink? Flink looked like a decent game, but I've yet to play it thoroughly. But one game isn't enough for a console to be succesfull, unless it's called Mario or Sonic.
StarEye is offline  
Old 01 May 2005, 11:53   #8
alexh
Thalion Webshrine
alexh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 11,939
Mainly because the hardware was rubbish. The CD32 Launch date was September 1993... but rumours within the game developer community were already going round about the two upcoming superconsoles from Sega & Nintendo. By Feb 1994 developers had Saturn Devkits.

If it had an extra custom chip for textured triangle rasterisation, and an FPU then it may have done better.... it could only just compete with the likes of the Megadrive and the SNES and was set to be outclassed by the Saturn and PS
alexh is offline  
Old 01 May 2005, 17:17   #9
icewizard2k5
Junior Member
icewizard2k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 31
Posts: 200
afaik Flink wasn't exclusive to cd32. 99% sure it was on genesis
icewizard2k5 is offline  
Old 02 May 2005, 04:56   #10
Akira
Registered User

Akira's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 18,274
No exclusive games
Because no one would code for the machine
Because the Amiga was already dying.

Oh and it looked like cheap shit!

The hardware wa NOT rubbish at all, I beg to differ. It would have been crushed by the PSX anyway, ut rubbish? pah

Bad timing/marjeting, as always, Commodore!
Akira is offline  
Old 02 May 2005, 07:44   #11
DrBong
HOL / AMR Team Member

DrBong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,210
Commodore was pretty much on its knees financially when they released the CD32 (the CD32 was their last hope!). The lack of money meant that they couldn't give the CD32 the release it deserved. That is:

- lavish worldwide marketing

- commissioning "killer" games exclusive to CD32 and having them ready at release (there were only about 6 games ready at release and 2 of them were the ones bundled with the console)

- generous support for 3rd party developers

- delayed U.S. release (3DO and Atari Jaguar were already available in the 2nd half of 1993 when the CD32 was released in Europe; the U.S. had to wait until the 1st half of 1994 for the release of CD32 and by then Commodore knew they were well and truly screwed because European sales weren't going to be enough to save them from bankruptcy)

- delayed release of FMV module (should have been ready closer to release, but probably more important for markets where they were competing with 3DO)

Also, there may have been a shortage of CD32s available for sale in the UK leading up to Christmas in 1993, which wouldn't have helped C='s cause if that was the case (my memory's fuzzy on this one!).

Anyway, it would probably have all been academic if C= had of been able to give the CD32 a more deserving release (and didn't go bankrupt). Sony would have cleaned them up with the PSX.

Last edited by DrBong; 02 May 2005 at 07:50.
DrBong is offline  
Old 02 May 2005, 07:57   #12
BlaCkAdDa
Zone Friend
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide / Australia
Age: 40
Posts: 211
Send a message via ICQ to BlaCkAdDa
They marketed to the existing amiga community but then offered them very little that they didn't already have.

That was the problem.

oh and it was expensive for a console too!
BlaCkAdDa is offline  
Old 02 May 2005, 21:10   #13
tin
eezeenow!

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chester
Posts: 407
err isn't it accepted that commodore failed because they needed to make 300,000 to drag themselves out of debt and only managed to make 100,00 before the banks forclosed on them?

AFAIK it was an (inexplicable) success, they just physcially couldn't make enough of em to sell enough to profit.

I might have got the figures wrong but I am pretty sure on the substance.
tin is offline  
Old 05 May 2005, 11:08   #14
Joe Slap
 
Posts: n/a
Poor Commodore marketing

Above all, yeah. They had to push it more & release it earlier & make a better design.
 
Old 05 May 2005, 13:08   #15
Fred the Fop
flaming faggot
Fred the Fop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Versailles
Age: 49
Posts: 2,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebel-CD32
The main reason was the lack of CD32 exclusive games. Only a few games came out on the CD32 ONLY. From memory, these were Microcosm and Flink.........
Microcosm made it to the Mega CD and 3DO.
Fred the Fop is offline  
Old 05 May 2005, 13:21   #16
wanderer
I want an A1000

wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pac-Land
Posts: 654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred the Duck
Microcosm made it to the Mega CD and 3DO.
And Philps CD-I too, with FMV support. Never played it, but it must have been much more impressive than the CD32 version.

Last edited by wanderer; 05 May 2005 at 14:17.
wanderer is offline  
Old 05 May 2005, 14:16   #17
wanderer
I want an A1000

wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pac-Land
Posts: 654
CD-I was cool.
wanderer is offline  
Old 05 May 2005, 14:49   #18
EmuChicken
Senior Member
EmuChicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nagoya, Japan (moved!)
Age: 34
Posts: 719
ooops, I clicked the wrong button

Does anyone know where I can get them old ads from ? :-) I wanna see em!
EmuChicken is offline  
Old 06 May 2005, 07:35   #19
Akira
Registered User

Akira's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 18,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrBong
- commissioning "killer" games exclusive to CD32 and having them ready at release
This tactic was not that used back then, not as it is now, was it? Most of this happened with in-house productions (Mario, Sonic) and Commodore obviously didn't have an in-jouse programming dept., at least not then.
Akira is offline  
Old 06 May 2005, 09:04   #20
utri007
mä vaan
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 673
CD32 didn't actually failed it sold quite well.

Launched in Europe during 1993 it quickly grabbed a large portion of the prototypical CD market, even beating PC CD-ROM. It's US success was also cut short when the U.S. government declared that Commodore could not bring anything into the country, as they had not paid the $10 million they owed for the XOR patent infringement lawsuit. The last ditch attempt to save the company failed and Commodore entered bankruptcy on April 29th 1994. The unshipped Amiga CD32 units were were seized by the Philippine government as payment for the use of their factory.

Although these events killed the CD32 as a viable platform it remained popular for several years, demonstrating a demand for Amiga CD titles. In 1994 a third party developer launched the SX-1 and SX32, allowing owners to turn their rejected console into a fully fledged Amiga
utri007 is offline  
AdSense AdSense  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
D3D9: Initialization Fail MrGimper support.WinUAE 10 11 September 2010 22:41
A600HD fail at boot jolly11 support.Hardware 7 06 June 2010 05:03
Cracks that FAIL! TCD Amiga scene 59 29 September 2009 21:00
Some games fail to run Aminut33 New to Emulation or Amiga scene 0 03 August 2006 21:53
C:Version fail? DDNI project.ClassicWB 5 13 July 2006 12:30

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Page generated in 0.23867 seconds with 12 queries